Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Kingston (2016)
Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability
T. Routen (1989)
Hierarchically organised formalisations
(2017)
A technical description of the model
(2016)
GDPR checklist
Nikolaos Aletras, D. Tsarapatsanis, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Vasileios Lampos (2016)
Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspectivePeerJ Comput. Sci., 2
(1991)
) , X - MATE : Creating an interpretation model for credit risk assessment
UK firms struggling to manage cyber threats, survey shows, Computer Weekly
Nisarg Vyas, J. Farringdon, Dave Andre, J. Stivoric (2011)
Machine Learning and Sensor Fusion for Estimating Continuous Energy ExpenditureAI Mag., 33
H. Nwana, R. Paton, Trevor Bench-Capon, M. Shave (1991)
Facilitating the Development of Knowledge Based Systems, A Critical Review of Aquisition Tools and TechniquesAI Commun., 4
J. Marchal (1950)
Cours d'economie politiquePopulation, 5
Last year's ICO fines would be 79 times higher under GDPR. The Register
(2017)
Preparing for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): 12 steps to take now
T. Engers (2005)
Legal Engineering: A structural approach to Improving Legal Quality
1. Assessment. Organisations
E. Thompson, E. Frolich, J. Bellows, Benjamin Bassford, E. Skiko, M. Fox (2015)
Process Diagnosis System (PDS) - A 30 Year History
Michal Kosinskihttps://www.semanticscholar.org/me/account, D. Stillwell, T. Graepel (2013)
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behaviorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110
Nilson Arrais (1966)
Quality control handbookRae-revista De Administracao De Empresas, 6
Enrique Ledesma (2015)
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (Gran Sala), de 13 de mayo de 2014, asunto C-131/12, Google Spain SL y Google Inc. contra Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) y Mario Costeja González: Derecho al olvido, 2
C. Gide
Cours d'économie politique
HS Nwana, RC Paton, TJM Bench-Capon, MJR Shave (1991)
Facilitating the development of knowledge based systemsAI Commun, 4
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2016)
A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical FrameworksArtificial Intelligence and Law, 24
Robert Muthuri, G. Boella, J. Hulstijn, Sara Capecchi, Llio Humphreys (2017)
Compliance patterns: harnessing value modeling and legal interpretation to manage regulatory conversationsProceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law
(2013)
Intelligent Systems XXXIII: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV
R. Kralingen, P. Visser, Trevor Bench-Capon, H. Herik (1999)
A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systemsInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 51
TM Engers (2006)
Applications and innovations in intelligent systems XIII
Is there a 'right to explanation' for machine learning in the GDPR? IAPP
T. Gordon (2013)
Introducing the Carneades web application
(2017)
The risk-based approach in the GDPR: interpretation and implications
Amit Dhurandhar, Rajesh Ravi, B. Graves, Gopikrishnan Maniachari, M. Ettl (2015)
Robust System for Identifying Procurement Fraud
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a European Union regulation that will replace the existing Data Protection Directive on 25 May 2018. The most significant change is a huge increase in the maximum fine that can be levied for breaches of the regulation. Yet fewer than half of UK companies are fully aware of GDPR—and a number of those who were preparing for it stopped doing so when the Brexit vote was announced. A last-minute rush to become compliant is therefore expected, and numerous companies are starting to offer advice, checklists and consultancy on how to comply with GDPR. In such an environment, artificial intelligence technologies ought to be able to assist by providing best advice; asking all and only the relevant questions; monitoring activities; and carrying out assessments. The paper considers four areas of GDPR compliance where rule based technologies and/or machine learning techniques may be relevant: Following compliance checklists and codes of conduct; Supporting risk assessments; Complying with the new regulations regarding technologies that perform automatic profiling; Complying with the new regulations concerning recognising and reporting breaches of security. It concludes that AI technology can support each of these four areas. The requirements that GDPR (or organisations that need to comply with GDPR) state for explanation and justification of reasoning imply that rule-based approaches are likely to be more helpful than machine learning approaches. However, there may be good business reasons to take a different approach in some circumstances.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.