Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Hojat, J.S. Gonnella, J.J. Veloski, J.B. Erdmann (1996)
Jefferson Medical College Longitudinal Study: A prototype for evaluation of changesEducation for Health, 9
J. Edwards, E. Johnson, J. Molidor (1990)
The interview in the admission processAcademic Medicine, 65
A. Edwards (1958)
Techniques Of Attitude Scale ConstructionBirchandra State Central Library,tripura
M. Kendall (1949)
Rank Correlation Methods
F. Hall, B. Bailey (1992)
Correlating students' undergraduate science GPAs, their MCAT scores, and the academic caliber of their undergraduate colleges with their first‐year academic performances across five classes at Dartmouth Medical SchoolAcademic Medicine, 67
B. Crabtree, W. Miller, Melinda Swenson (1999)
Doing Qualitative Research
W. Thompson, H. David (1966)
The method of paired comparisons
Chan Moruzi, G. Norman (2002)
Validity of Admissions Measures in Predicting Performance Outcomes: The Contribution of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive DimensionsTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 14
(1994)
Admission Requirements to Canadian Faculties of Medicine and their Selection Policies
J. Colliver, S. Verhulst, R. Williams (1989)
Using a standardized‐patient examination to establish the predictive validity of the MCAT and undergraduate GPA as admissions criteriaAcademic Medicine, 64
B. Ferrier, R. Mcauley, R. Roberts (1978)
Selection of Medical Students at McMaster UniversityJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 12
D. Powis, T. Waring, T. Bristow, D. O’Connell (1992)
The structured interview as a tool for predicting premature withdrawal from medical school.Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine, 22 6
(1997)
Medical School Admission Requirements, United States and Canada 1998-1999
The Undergraduate Medical Programme at McMasterUniversity selects students using acomprehensive set of tools. Attempts to modifythe selection process over many years have beenimpeded by an inability to reconcile verystrongly held views among stakeholders as tothe importance of the selection tools and,indeed, the very purposes of the admissionprocess. The objective of this study was toidentify key `qualities' of the selectionprocess and to measure their relativeimportance to admissions process assessors.Through a qualitative review of internalresearch documents, Medical ProgrammeAdmissions Committee meeting minutes, memos andaccreditation surveys eight qualities of theadmissions process were identified: validity,fairness, accessibility, comprehensiveness,affordability, legal defensibility,contribution to class diversity and the role ofthe process as a public statement of theProgramme's values. Faculty, students andcommunity admissions assessors were surveyed,by mail, using a paired-comparisons technique.The overall response rate was 58%. By a widemargin, all three groups of admissionsassessors valued validity and fairness mosthighly. The least valued qualities wereaffordability and the role of the process as astatement of our values. Possible applicationsof this approach to the admissions processdeliberations are discussed.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 14, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.