Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Z. Wang (2000)
Two dimensional mechanism for insect hoveringPhysical Review Letters, 85
R. Dudley (1999)
The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution
M. Sun, Jian Tang (2002)
Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion.The Journal of experimental biology, 205 Pt 1
R. Dudley, C. Ellington (1990)
Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: I. Kinematics and MorphologyThe Journal of Experimental Biology, 148
C.P. Ellington (1984)
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parametersPhil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 305
J. Usherwood, C. Ellington (2002)
The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail.The Journal of experimental biology, 205 Pt 11
M. Dickinson, K. Götz (1993)
UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERSThe Journal of Experimental Biology, 174
S. Mao, Du Gang (2003)
Lift and power requirements of hovering insect flightActa Mechanica Sinica, 19
M. Sun, Jianghao Wu (2003)
Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motionJournal of Experimental Biology, 206
S. Sane, M. Dickinson (2001)
The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production.The Journal of experimental biology, 204 Pt 15
R. Dudley (2002)
The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form
C. Ellington (1984)
The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. VI. Lift and Power RequirementsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 305
T. Weis-Fogh (1973)
Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals
C. Ellington (1984)
The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. IV. Aeorodynamic MechanismsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 305
J. Tang M. Sun (2002)
Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in DrosophilaJ. Exp. Biol., 205
M. Sun, S. Lan (2004)
A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hoveringJournal of Experimental Biology, 207
C.P. Ellington (1984)
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirementsPhil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 305
C.P. Ellington (1984)
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. IV. Aerodynamic mechanismsPhil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 305
M. Sun, Jian Tang (2002)
Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis.The Journal of experimental biology, 205 Pt 16
C. Ellington (1984)
The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. II. Morphological ParametersPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 305
R. Dudley, C. Ellington (1990)
Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: II. QUASI-STEADY LIFT AND POWER REQUIREMENTSThe Journal of Experimental Biology, 148
J. Usherwood, C. Ellington (2002)
The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings.The Journal of experimental biology, 205 Pt 11
M. Dickinson, F. Lehmann, S. Sane (1999)
Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight.Science, 284 5422
Alexander Willmott, C. Ellington (1997)
The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.The Journal of experimental biology, 200 Pt 21
T. Weis-fogh (1973)
Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanism for lift productionJ. Exp. Biol., 59
Jianghao Wu, M. Sun (2004)
Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wingJournal of Experimental Biology, 207
Abstract Aerodynamic forces and power requirements in forward flight in a bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) were studied using the method of computational fluid dynamics. Actual wing kinematic data of free flight were used in the study (the speed ranges from 0 m/s to 4.5 m/s; advance ratio ranges from 0–0.66). The bumblebee employs the delayed stall mechanism and the fast pitching-up rotation mechanism to produce vertical force and thrust. The leading-edge vortex does not shed in the translatory phase of the half-strokes and is much more concentrated than that of the fruit fly in a previous study. At hovering and low-speed flight, the vertical force is produced by both the half-strokes and is contributed by wing lift; at medium and high speeds, the vertical force is mainly produced during the downstroke and is contributed by both wing lift and wing drag. At all speeds the thrust is mainly produced in the upstroke and is contributed by wing drag. The power requirement at low to medium speeds is not very different from that of hovering and is relatively large at the highest speed (advance ratio 0.66), i.e. the power curve is J-shaped. Except at the highest flight speed, storing energy elastically can save power up to 20%–30%. At the highest speed, because of the large increase of aerodynamic torque and the slight decrease of inertial torque (due to the smaller stroke amplitude and stroke frequency used), the power requirement is dominated by aerodynamic power and the effect of elastic storage of energy on power requirement is limited.
"Acta Mechanica Sinica" – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.