Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Constantino says ''I recall I have seen Pelser under a bench'' (Input); 2. Constantino recalls having seen Pelser under a bench (1, Witness Testimony)
C. Reed, D. Walton (2001)
Applications of Argumentation Schemes
Bart Verheij (2003)
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: towards a methodology for the investigation of argumentation schemes
R. Lempert (1986)
The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of ProofBoston University Law Review, 66
Jeroen Keppens, John Zeleznikow (2003)
A model based reasoning approach for generating plausible crime scenarios from evidence
H. Crombag, W. Wagenaar, P. Koppen (1994)
Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence
A. Jøsang, Viggo Bondi (2000)
Legal reasoning with subjective logicArtificial Intelligence and Law, 8
Bart Verheij (1999)
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
P. Dung (1995)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person GamesArtif. Intell., 77
J. Pollock (1995)
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person
(1991)
Marshalling Evidence for Adversary Litigation
Bart Verheij (2000)
Dialectical Argumentation As A Heuristic For Courtroom Decision Making
(1997)
Appeal to Expert Opinion
(2002)
The development and rapid evaluation of the knowledge model of 27
M. Malsch, J. Nijboer (1999)
Complex cases : perspective on the Netherlands criminal justice system
S. Covey (1989)
The design of an attorney's statistical consultant
P. Koppen (2000)
Rationality, information and progress in law and psychology
J. Kadane, D. Schum (1996)
A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence
J. Pollock (1987)
Defeasible ReasoningCogn. Sci., 11
L. Tribe (1971)
Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal ProcessHarvard Law Review, 84
P. Krause, Simon Ambler, M. Elvang-Gøransson, J. Fox (1995)
A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTYComputational Intelligence, 11
(1996)
Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat
(2003)
Formalising evidential reasoning. Student paper Cognitive Artificial Intelligence
Pelser was under a bench
D. Hitchcock (2003)
Toulmin’s Warrants
Leslie Morsek (2001)
Get on Board for the Ride of Your Life! The Ups, the Downs, the Twists, and the Turns of the Applicability of the "Gatekeeper" Function to Scientific and Non-Scientific Expert Evidence: Kumho'sExpansion of DaubertAkron law review, 34
Ch. Perelman (1957)
The New Rhetoric
Jerold Israel (1963)
Gideon v. Wainwright: The "Art" of OverrulingThe Supreme Court Review, 1963
D. Walton (1995)
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
H. Prakken, C. Reed, D. Walton (2003)
Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence
C. Reed (2001)
Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML
T. Anderson, W. Twining (1997)
Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof
J. Hage (1996)
A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to matchArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
A. Halevy (2000)
Theory of answering queries using viewsSIGMOD Rec., 29
S. Zilberstein, Stuart Russell (1995)
Approximate Reasoning Using Anytime Algorithms
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1996)
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
D. Walton (1996)
Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory
C. Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969)
The New Rhetoric (La Nouvelle Rhetorique)
H. Prakken (2004)
Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentationLaw, Probability and Risk, 3
W. Seagle, J. Wigmore (1931)
The Principles of Judicial ProofJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 24
(1963)
A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation
D. Schum (1994)
The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning
Ian Horrocks, Sergio Tessaris (2000)
A Conjunctive Query Language for Description Logic Aboxes
M. Edwards (2004)
EvidenceThe Lancet, 363
J. Pollock (1998)
Perceiving and Reasoning about a Changing WorldComputational Intelligence, 14
V. Haarslev, Ralf Möller (2001)
Description of the RACER System and its ApplicationsDescription Logics
Manfred Kienpointner (1992)
Alltagslogik : Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern
D. Hitchcock (2003)
Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
L. S. Lutomski (1989)
Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Law
B. Selman, Henry Kautz (1996)
Knowledge compilation and theory approximationJ. ACM, 43
(2000)
Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam SicSat
R. Loui, Jeff Norman, J. Altepeter, Dan Pinkard, D. Craven, J. Linsday, Mark Foltz (1997)
Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation
(1999)
Necessary but dangerous? Generalisations and narrative in argumentation about ''facts'' in criminal process
T. Dean, M. Boddy (1988)
An Analysis of Time-Dependent Planning
M. C. Bromby, M. J. J. Hall (2002)
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
M. Dalal (1996)
Semantics of an Anytime Family of Reasoners
(1999)
On Generalisations I: A Preliminary Exploration
W. Young, D. Kaiser (1985)
Postmortem: New Evidence in the Case of Sacco and Vanzetti
Monica Boer (1995)
Anchored NarrativesRevue internationale de semiotique juridique, 8
W. A. Wagenaar, P. J. v. Koppen, H. Crombag (1993)
The Psychology of Criminal Evidence
Pelser says ''I recall that I was at the window and that I saw Sacco at the scene of the crime when it occurred'' (Input); 10. Pelser is not truthful
Michael Bromby, M. Hall (2002)
The Development and Rapid Evolution of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony
A. Teije, F. Harmelen (1997)
Exploiting Domain Knowledge for Approximate Diagnosis
D. Schum (2002)
Alternative Views of Argument Construction from a Mass of Evidence
TOWARDS A FORMAL ACCOUNT OF REASONING ABOUT EVIDENCE References
J. L. Pollock (1995)
A Blueprint for How to Build a Person
A. C. Hastings (1963)
Ph. D. Diss.
F. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, Andrea Schaerf (1997)
Reasoning in description logics
M. Schaerf, Marco Cadoli (1995)
Tractable Reasoning via ApproximationArtif. Intell., 74
R. Loui, Jeff Norman (1995)
Rationales and argument movesArtificial Intelligence and Law, 3
Jin-Tan Yang (2003)
Visualizing Argumentation -Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-MakingJ. Educ. Technol. Soc., 6
L. Morsek (2001)
Get on Board for the Ride of Your Life!The Ups, the Downs, the Twists, and the Turns of the Applicability of the ''Gatekeeper ''Function to Scientific and Non-Scientific Expert EvidenceAkron Law Review, 34
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeasible reasoning and argumentation. In particular, Wigmore's method for charting evidence and its use by modern legal evidence scholars is studied in order to give a formal underpinning in terms of logics for defeasible argumentation. Two notions turn out to be crucial, viz. argumentation schemes and empirical generalisations.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 7, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.