Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Merry, S. Silbey (1987)
WHAT DO PLAINTIFFS WANT? REEXAMINING THE CONCEPT OF DISPUTE*
R. Bush (1989)
Mediation and Adjudication, Dispute Resolution and Ideology: An Imaginary Conversation, 3
A. Talbot (1983)
Settling things: Six case studies in environmental mediation
J. Mccarthy, A. Shorett (1984)
Negotiating settlements : a guide to environmental mediation
G. Bingham (1986)
Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience
Allan Lind, John Thibaut, L. Walker, EA Lind, TR Tyler (1988)
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
G. Cormick, J. Brock, Kenneth Kressel, Dean Pruitt (1989)
Can negotiation be institutionalized or mandated?Mediation Research
B. Gray, Tina Hay (1986)
Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and ChangeThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22
J. Morone (1991)
The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government
J. Rosenau (1990)
Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity
B. Alper, Robert Goldmann (1982)
Roundtable Justice: Case Studies in Conflict ResolutionContemporary Sociology, 11
R. Bush (1989)
Defining Quality in Dispute Resolution: Taxonomies and Anti-Taxonomies of Quality ArgumentsDenver University Law Review, 66
J. Rosenau, Charles Kegley (1991)
Interdependence and the simultaneity puzzle: Notes on the outbreak of peaceThe long post was peace
Book Review Reflections on the Path to Transforming Society (and Some Obstacles Along the Way) Linda Stamato Barbara Gray. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989. 327 pp. Iouise Nieuwmeijer. Negotiation: Methodology and 'Jraining. Durban, South Africa: Owen Burgess, 1988. 180 pp. Linda R. Singer. Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution in Business, Families, and the Legal System. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1990. 196 pp. How is it that parties to decisions perspective on managing life's deci and disputes, in this contentious, liti sions and disputes large and small; gious, adversarial society of ours, tran assay formality and tradition in the scend narrow self-interest and administration of justice and in single-issue preoccupation, retreat organizational and institutional set from zealous advocacy, and ascend to tings; and, not surprisingly, find the that higher ground that is the turf of adversarial process and its outcomes contemporary dispute resolvers? This coming up short. Their ideal commu complex question absorbs the atten nity is one that has moved, substan tion of Louise Nieuwmeijer, Linda tially, toward a negotiated order. Singer and Barbara Gray; indeed, it is In this, they have hit on one of the at the very heart of their collective
Negotiation Journal – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.