Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Tang, F. Chiclana, Peide Liu (2020)
A decision-theoretic rough set model with q-rung orthopair fuzzy information and its application in stock investment evaluationAppl. Soft Comput., 91
L. Zadeh (1975)
The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - IInf. Sci., 8
Fan Min, Huaping He, Y. Qian, William Zhu (2011)
Test-cost-sensitive attribute reductionInf. Sci., 181
Yucheng Dong, Sihai Zhao, Hengjie Zhang, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma (2018)
A Self-Management Mechanism for Noncooperative Behaviors in Large-Scale Group Consensus Reaching ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26
Decui Liang, W. Pedrycz, Dun Liu, Pei Hu (2015)
Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision makingAppl. Soft Comput., 29
Decui Liang, Dun Liu (2014)
Systematic studies on three-way decisions with interval-valued decision-theoretic rough setsInf. Sci., 276
Weizhi Wu, Wenxiu Zhang, Huaizu Li (2003)
Knowledge acquisition in incomplete fuzzy information systems via the rough set approachExpert Systems, 20
Tianxing Wang, Huaxiong Li, Libo Zhang, Xianzhong Zhou, Bing Huang (2020)
A three-way decision model based on cumulative prospect theoryInf. Sci., 519
Yiyu Yao, Yan Zhao (2008)
Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set modelsInf. Sci., 178
Zhibin Wu, Jiuping Xu (2012)
Consensus reaching models of linguistic preference relations based on distance functionsSoft Computing, 16
Xiuyi Jia, Wenhe Liao, Zhenming Tang, L. Shang (2013)
Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set modelsInf. Sci., 219
Chao Zhang, Deyu Li, Jiye Liang (2020)
Multi-granularity three-way decisions with adjustable hesitant fuzzy linguistic multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets over two universesInf. Sci., 507
P. Mandal, Sovan Samanta, M. Pal (2021)
Multiplicative consistency analysis of linguistic preference relation with self‐confidence level and self‐doubting level and its application in a group decision makingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36
Kobina Agbodah (2019)
The determination of three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets considering the loss function evaluated by multiple expertsGranular Computing, 4
Congcong Li, Yucheng Dong, F. Herrera (2019)
A Consensus Model for Large-Scale Linguistic Group Decision Making With a Feedback Recommendation Based on Clustered Personalized Individual Semantics and Opposing Consensus GroupsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27
Bingsheng Liu, Yinghua Shen, Xiao-hong Chen, Yuan Chen, Xueqing Wang (2014)
A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problemsInf. Fusion, 18
Yiyu Yao (2011)
The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set modelsInf. Sci., 181
I. Palomares, Luis Martínez-López, F. Herrera (2014)
A Consensus Model to Detect and Manage Noncooperative Behaviors in Large-Scale Group Decision MakingIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22
F. Min, William Zhu (2012)
Attribute reduction of data with error ranges and test costsInf. Sci., 211
Zeshui Xu, M. Xia (2011)
Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy setsInf. Sci., 181
Xia Liu, Yejun Xu, Yao Ge, Weike Zhang, F. Herrera (2019)
A Group Decision Making Approach Considering Self-Confidence Behaviors and Its Application in Environmental Pollution Emergency ManagementInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16
Yiyu Yao (2010)
Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough setsInf. Sci., 180
Yucheng Dong, Hengjie Zhang, E. Herrera-Viedma (2016)
Integrating experts' weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviorsDecis. Support Syst., 84
P. Mandal, Sovan Samanta, M. Pal (2021)
Large-scale group decision-making based on Pythagorean linguistic preference relations using experts clustering and consensus measure with non-cooperative behavior analysis of clustersComplex & Intelligent Systems, 8
Hongying Zhang, S. Yang (2019)
Three-way group decisions with interval-valued decision-theoretic rough sets based on aggregating inclusion measuresInt. J. Approx. Reason., 110
Xia Liu, Yejun Xu, F. Herrera (2019)
Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviorsInf. Fusion, 52
Chao Zhang, Deyu Li, Jiye Liang (2020)
Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-granularity three-way decisions in consensus processes with applications to multi-attribute group decision makingInf. Sci., 511
Tinghui Ouyang, W. Pedrycz, N. Pizzi (2019)
Record linkage based on a three-way decision with the use of granular descriptorsExpert Syst. Appl., 122
Wenqi Liu, Hengjie Zhang, Xia Chen, Shui Yu (2018)
Managing consensus and self-confidence in multiplicative preference relations in group decision makingKnowl. Based Syst., 162
S. Maldonado, Georg Peters, R. Weber (2020)
Credit scoring using three-way decisions with probabilistic rough setsInf. Sci., 507
Chi-Ming Lin, M. Gen (2008)
Multi-criteria human resource allocation for solving multistage combinatorial optimization problems using multiobjective hybrid genetic algorithmExpert Syst. Appl., 34
Jifang Pang, Jiye Liang (2012)
Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic informationOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 40
Jian-jun Zhu, Shitao Zhang, Ye Chen, Lili Zhang (2016)
A Hierarchical Clustering Approach Based on Three-Dimensional Gray Relational Analysis for Clustering a Large Group of Decision Makers with Double InformationGroup Decision and Negotiation, 25
Decui Liang, Dun Liu (2015)
Deriving three-way decisions from intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough setsInf. Sci., 300
Z Pawlak (1982)
Rough setsInt J Comput Inform Sci, 11
Congcong Li, Yucheng Dong, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, Luis Martínez-López (2017)
Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reachingInf. Fusion, 33
Qinghua Hu, Daren Yu, Zongxia Xie, Jinfu Liu (2006)
Fuzzy probabilistic approximation spaces and their information measuresIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14
Tianxing Wang, Huaxiong Li, Yuhua Qian, Bing Huang, Xianzhong Zhou (2022)
A Regret-Based Three-Way Decision Model Under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy EnvironmentIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30
Francisco Quesada, I. Palomares, Luis Martínez-López (2015)
Managing experts behavior in large-scale consensus reaching processes with uninorm aggregation operatorsAppl. Soft Comput., 35
R. Eberhart, J. Kennedy (1995)
A new optimizer using particle swarm theoryMHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science
Weimin Ma, Wenjing Lei, B. Sun (2020)
Three-way group decisions based on multigranulation hesitant fuzzy decision-theoretic rough set over two universesJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 38
Hong Yu, Zhanguo Liu, Guoyin Wang (2014)
An automatic method to determine the number of clusters using decision-theoretic rough setInt. J. Approx. Reason., 55
Xuan-hua Xu, Zhi-jiao Du, Xiao-hong Chen (2015)
Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinionsDecis. Support Syst., 79
Yiyu Yao, S. Wong (1992)
A Decision Theoretic Framework for Approximating ConceptsInt. J. Man Mach. Stud., 37
Wenqi Liu, Yucheng Dong, F. Chiclana, F. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma (2016)
Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidenceFuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16
Hengjie Zhang, Yucheng Dong, E. Herrera-Viedma (2018)
Consensus Building for the Heterogeneous Large-Scale GDM With the Individual Concerns and SatisfactionsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26
Dun Liu, Tianrui Li, Decui Liang (2012)
THREE-WAY GOVERNMENT DECISION ANALYSIS WITH DECISION-THEORETIC ROUGH SETSInternational Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 20
Peng Wu, Qun Wu, Ligang Zhou, Huayou Chen (2020)
Optimal group selection model for large-scale group decision makingInf. Fusion, 61
Bing Zhou (2014)
Multi-class decision-theoretic rough setsInt. J. Approx. Reason., 55
T. Beaubouef, F. Petry (2009)
Rough Sets
Zeshui Xu (2004)
A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relationsInf. Sci., 166
F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J. Verdegay (1996)
A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessmentsFuzzy Sets Syst., 78
Xia Liu, Yejun Xu, R. Montes-Soldado, Yucheng Dong, F. Herrera (2019)
Analysis of self‐confidence indices‐based additive consistency for fuzzy preference relations with self‐confidence and its application in group decision makingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
Peide Liu, Xin Zhang, Weilong Liu (2011)
A risk evaluation method for the high-tech project investment based on uncertain linguistic variablesTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 78
Zeshui Xu (2005)
Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision makingOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 33
Zeshui Xu (2008)
Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relationsInf. Sci., 178
Jun-liang Du, Sifeng Liu, Yong Liu (2021)
A novel grey multi-criteria three-way decisions model and its applicationComput. Ind. Eng., 158
E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera (2007)
A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference RelationsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15
Ru-Xi Ding, Xueqing Wang, Kun Shang, Bingsheng Liu, F. Herrera (2019)
Sparse Representation-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Clustering Approach to Find the Group Intra-Relations and Group Leaders for Large-Scale Decision MakingIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27
Fan Jia, Peide Liu (2019)
A novel three-way decision model under multiple-criteria environmentInf. Sci., 471
Feng Shen, Xingchao Zhao, Gang Kou (2020)
Three-stage reject inference learning framework for credit scoring using unsupervised transfer learning and three-way decision theoryDecis. Support Syst., 137
Jiajia Wang, Xueling Ma, Zeshui Xu, J. Zhan (2021)
Three-way multi-attribute decision making under hesitant fuzzy environmentsInf. Sci., 552
Decui Liang, Dun Liu, A. Kobina (2016)
Three-way group decisions with decision-theoretic rough setsInf. Sci., 345
R. Duda, P. Hart (1974)
Pattern classification and scene analysis
Peide Liu, Yumei Wang, Fan Jia, H. Fujita (2020)
A multiple attribute decision making three-way model for intuitionistic fuzzy numbersInt. J. Approx. Reason., 119
Zeshui Xu (2004)
Eowa And Eowg Operators For Aggregating Linguistic Labels Based On Linguistic Preference RelationsInt. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst., 12
R. Intan, M. Mukaidono (2002)
Generalized Fuzzy Rough Sets by Conditional Probability RelationsInt. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., 16
Decui Liang, Dun Liu (2015)
A Novel Risk Decision Making Based on Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets Under Hesitant Fuzzy InformationIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23
Decui Liang, Dun Liu, W. Pedrycz, Pei Hu (2013)
Triangular fuzzy decision-theoretic rough setsInt. J. Approx. Reason., 54
Yuhui Shi, R. Eberhart (1998)
A modified particle swarm optimizer1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360)
K Agbodah (2019)
285Computing, 4
A. Campagner, D. Ciucci, C. Svensson, M. Figge, F. Cabitza (2021)
Ground truthing from multi-rater labeling with three-way decision and possibility theoryInf. Sci., 545
Q. Shen, A. Chouchoulas (2002)
A rough-fuzzy approach for generating classification rulesPattern Recognit., 35
Aiming of this paper is to introduce large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) into three-way decisions (3WDs) with decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRSs) and propose LSGDM based 3WDs under linguistic assessments. There are two parameters involved of the 3WDs with DTRSs such as conditional probability and loss functions. Here we mainly focus on the calculation of loss function using LSGDM approach. LSGDM problem is characterized by a large number of experts, multiple clusters and a mass of evaluation data given by the experts. In some cases, experts are unwilling to revise their opinions to reach a consensus. So, the proper management of experts opinions and their non-cooperative behaviors (NCBs) is necessary to establish a consensus model. An appropriate adjustment of the credibility information is also essential. Using the clustering method, the proposed model divides the experts with similar evaluations into a subgroup. In each cluster, the experts’ opinions are then aggregate. In order to measure the level of consensus among clusters, the cluster consensus index (CCI) and group consensus index (GCI) have been developed. Then, using a tool for managing the NCBs of clusters includes two components: (1) for identifying the NCBs of clusters, NCB degree has defined using CCI and GCI; (2) for consensus improvement, implemented the weight punishment mechanism to NCBs clusters. Finally, we have designed a rule for classifying the objects into three regions, and the associated cost of each object is derived for ranking the objects in each region. An example is offered for selection of the Energy project to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Artificial Intelligence Review – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 1, 2022
Keywords: Linguistic terms; Decision-theoretic rough sets; Three-way decisions; Large-scale group decision making
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.