Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jianpeng Cheng, Mirella Lapata (2016)
Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and WordsArXiv, abs/1603.07252
G. Sartor (2002)
Teleological arguments and theory-based dialecticsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 10
Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin Ashley (2003)
Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments
J. Horty, Trevor Bench-Capon (2012)
A factor-based definition of precedential constraintArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
Trevor Bench-Capon (2012)
Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factorsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
(2015)
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, and Trevor Bench-Capon. A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using ADFs
Floris Bex, H. Prakken, C. Reed, D. Walton (2003)
Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and GeneralisationsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 11
Floris Bex (2021)
On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision makingProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
(1986)
Analysis of the logical structure of legal rules by a modernized and formalized version of Hohfeld legal conceptions
G. Sartor (2010)
Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionalityArtificial Intelligence and Law, 18
Iyad Rahwan, C. Reed (2009)
The Argument Interchange Format
A. Gargett, Robin Firth, Nikolaos Aletras (2020)
LegalOps: A Summarization Corpus of Legal Opinions2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
T. Gordon (1993)
The Pleadings GameArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Danushka Bollegala (2020)
Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and futureArtif. Intell., 289
K. Baier (2016)
The Uses Of Argument
Jingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter Liu (2019)
PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationArXiv, abs/1912.08777
Micha(cid:32)l Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Trevor Bench-Capon, L. Karl Branting, Jack G. Conrad, and Adam Wyner. Thirty years of AI and Law: The third decade
J. Horty (2011)
RULES AND REASONS IN THE THEORY OF PRECEDENTLegal Theory, 17
E. Rissland, Kevin Ashley (1987)
A case-based system for trade secrets law
(2017)
Simeri A (2021) Unsupervised law article mining based on deep pre‐trained language repre
I. Pörn (1978)
POSITION AND CHANGE: A Study in Law and LogicPhilosophical Books, 19
Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Nikolaos Aletras, Ion Androutsopoulos (2020)
LEGAL-BERT: “Preparing the Muppets for Court’”ArXiv, abs/2010.02559
João Lima, Cristine Griffo, J. Almeida, G. Guizzardi, M. Aranha (2021)
CASTING THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF OPPOSITION ONTO HOHFELD'S FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTSLegal Theory, 27
Paheli Bhattacharya, Kaustubh Hiware, Subham Rajgaria, Nilay Pochhi, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh (2019)
A Comparative Study of Summarization Algorithms Applied to Legal Case Judgments
Trevor Bench-Capon, H. Prakken (2010)
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in lawArtificial Intelligence and Law, 18
R. Hoekstra, J. Breuker, M. Bello, A. Boer (2007)
The LKIF Core Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts
A. Wyner, R. Hoekstra (2012)
A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. HayashiArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
M. Eisenberg (2000)
Legal Reasoning: The Simultaneous Equation (Program)
(2020)
Automated analysis
J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, Fernando Pereira (2001)
Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data
M. Araszkiewicz (2021)
Critical Questions to Argumentation Schemes in Statutory InterpretationFLAP, 8
L. Lindahl (1977)
Position and change
Bart Verheij (2003)
DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified AssumptionsJ. Log. Comput., 13
Kevin Ashley (2019)
A Brief History of the Changing Roles of Case Prediction in AI and LawLaw in Context. A Socio-legal Journal
Juliano Maranhão, Edelcio Souza, G. Sartor (2021)
A dynamic model for balancing valuesProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
J. Pollock (2008)
Reasoning: Defeasible Reasoning
Catherine Marshall (1989)
Representing the structure of a legal argument
Heng Zheng, D. Grossi, Bart Verheij (2021)
Hardness of case-based decisions: a formal theoryProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Jamie Brew (2019)
HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language ProcessingArXiv, abs/1910.03771
D. Berman, C. Hafner (1993)
Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link
T. Gordon, D. Walton (2009)
Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes
A. Valente, J. Breuker, Bob Brouwer (1999)
Legal modeling and automated reasoning with ON-LINEInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 51
MJ Sergot, D Gabbay, J Horty, X Parent, R van der Meyden, L van der Torre (2013)
Normative positionsHandbook of deontic logic and normative systems
Marco Lippi, Paolo Torroni (2018)
Argumentation MiningSynthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
Bart Verheij (2016)
Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems designArtificial Intelligence and Law, 24
Andrew Jones, X. Parent (2008)
Normative-informational positions: a modal-logical approachArtificial Intelligence and Law, 16
Ilias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Nikolaos Aletras (2019)
Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English
G. Sartor (2006)
Fundamental legal concepts: A formal and teleological characterisation*Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14
Anastassia Kornilova, Vladimir Eidelman (2019)
BillSum: A Corpus for Automatic Summarization of US LegislationArXiv, abs/1910.00523
R. Steinberger, B. Pouliquen, Anna Widiger, Camelia Ignat, T. Erjavec, D. Tufis, D. Varga (2006)
The JRC-Acquis: A Multilingual Aligned Parallel Corpus with 20+ Languages
Layman Allen, Charles Saxon (1994)
A-Hohfeld: a language for robust structural representation of knowledge in the legal domain to build interpretation-assistance expert systems
Andrea Tagarelli, Andrea Simeri (2021)
Unsupervised law article mining based on deep pre-trained language representation models with application to the Italian civil codeArtificial Intelligence and Law, 30
L Alexander (1989)
1South Calif Law Rev, 63
A. Chorley, Trevor Bench-Capon (2005)
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and applicationArtificial Intelligence and Law, 13
T. Gordon, D. Walton (2012)
A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v HayashiArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
Kevin Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus (2009)
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomesArtificial Intelligence and Law, 17
A. Peldszus, Manfred Stede (2013)
From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A SurveyInt. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell., 7
Guozhu Dong, Huan Liu (2018)
Feature Engineering for Machine Learning and Data Analytics
Trevor Bench-Capon (1989)
Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems
Adam Rigoni (2018)
Representing dimensions within the reason model of precedentArtificial Intelligence and Law, 26
J. Mumford, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2021)
Explaining Factor Ascription
Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson (2018)
Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude
Ben Hachey, Claire Grover (2006)
Extractive summarisation of legal textsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 14
J. Cottingham (1986)
A Theory of LawPhilosophical Books, 27
L. McCarty (1983)
Permissions and Obligations
JL Pollock (1987)
Defeasible reasoningCogn Sci, 11
H. Prakken, C. Reed, D. Walton (2005)
Dialogues about the burden of proof
Matthias Grabmair (2017)
Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffsProceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law
J. Breuker, A. Valente, R. Winkels (2004)
Legal Ontologies in Knowledge Engineering and Information ManagementArtificial Intelligence and Law, 12
V. Aleven, Kevin Ashley (1995)
Doing things with factors
J. Searle (1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
S. Kanger (2008)
Law and logicTheoria, 38
J. Meyer, R. Wieringa (1994)
Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification
V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, Y. Maeda, Xinyu Yang, Wenjing Yang, Ming Zeng, S. Tsumoto, Y. Bi, D. Bell, Hui Wang, G. Guo (2004)
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, 3131
Trevor Bench-Capon, Frans Coenen, Paul Orton (1993)
Argument‐based explanation of the British nationality act as a logic programInformation & Communications Technology Law, 2
J. Breuker, Abdullatif Elhag, Emilian Petkov (2002)
IT Support for the Judiciary: Use of Ontologies in the e-Court Project
Haoxiang Zhong, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu, Chaojun Xiao, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun (2018)
Legal Judgment Prediction via Topological Learning
H. Kelsen (1966)
On The Pure Theory of LawIsrael Law Review, 1
T. Agnoloni, Meritxell Barrera, M. Sagri, D. Tiscornia, Giulia Venturi (2009)
When a FrameNet-Style Knowledge Description Meets an Ontological Characterization of Fundamental Legal Concepts
Floris Bex (2011)
Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence - A Formal Hybrid Theory, 92
J. Breuker, R. Hoekstra (2004)
Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously
Adam Rigoni (2015)
An improved factor based approach to precedential constraintArtificial Intelligence and Law, 23
Silvia Ingolfo, A. Siena, J. Mylopoulos, A. Susi, A. Perini (2013)
Arguing regulatory compliance of software requirementsData Knowl. Eng., 87
Katie Atkinson (2012)
Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. HayashiArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
U. Hahn, M. Oaksford, Adam Harris (2013)
Testimony and argument: a Bayesian perspective
Ramesh Nallapati, Feifei Zhai, Bowen Zhou (2016)
SummaRuNNer: A Recurrent Neural Network Based Sequence Model for Extractive Summarization of DocumentsArXiv, abs/1611.04230
T. Gordon, H. Prakken, D. Walton (2007)
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proofArtif. Intell., 171
A. Peldszus, Manfred Stede (2016)
Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue text
E. Rissland, Xiaoxi Xu (2011)
Catching Gray Cygnets: an initial exploration
J Hage (1997)
10.1007/978-94-015-8873-7Reasoning with rules: an essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic
Andrew Jones, M. Sergot (1992)
Deontic logic in the representation of law: Towards a methodologyArtificial Intelligence and Law, 1
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2021)
Argumentation schemes in AI and LawArgument Comput., 12
Robert Muthuri, G. Boella, J. Hulstijn, Sara Capecchi, Llio Humphreys (2017)
Compliance patterns: harnessing value modeling and legal interpretation to manage regulatory conversationsProceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law
Raquel Palau, Marie-Francine Moens (2011)
Argumentation miningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 19
Yohan Jo, J. Visser, C. Reed, E. Hovy (2019)
A Cascade Model for Proposition Extraction in Argumentation
Floris Bex, Bart Verheij (2012)
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story SchemesArgumentation, 26
L. Branting (1991)
Reasoning with portions of precedents
Torben Spaak (1994)
The Concept of Legal Competence: An Essay in Conceptual Analysis
Grant Lamond (2005)
DO PRECEDENTS CREATE RULES?Legal Theory, 11
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova (2019)
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Raquel Palau, Marie-Francine Moens (2008)
Study on the Structure of Argumentation in Case Law
D. Berman, C. Hafner (1995)
Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine
E. Francesconi (2014)
A description logic framework for advanced accessing and reasoning over normative provisionsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 22
Trevor Bench-Capon, S. Modgil (2009)
Case law in extended argumentation frameworks
A. Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon (2008)
Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation FrameworksJ. Log. Comput., 19
D. Berman, C. Hafner (1991)
Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning
Trevor Bench-Capon (2002)
The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argumentArtificial Intelligence and Law, 10
(2016)
Legal relations in a core ontology of legal aspects based on
(2013)
Normative Positions, pages 353–406
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second…
J. Hage (1997)
Reasoning with Rules
L. Alexander (2011)
CONSTRAINED BY PRECEDENT
Bart Verheij (2003)
Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal LogicArtificial Intelligence and Law, 11
Trevor Bench-Capon, G. Sartor (2003)
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and valuesArtif. Intell., 150
Carole, Hafer, John Zeleznikow, D. Hunter, G. Sartor (2020)
THE NEED FOR GOOD OLD FASHIONED AI AND LAW
J. Horty (2017)
Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudesArtificial Intelligence and Law
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Floris Bex, T. Gordon, H. Prakken, G. Sartor, B. Verheij (2020)
In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and lawArtificial Intelligence and Law
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2016)
A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical FrameworksArtificial Intelligence and Law, 24
(2007)
Guido Governatori, Micha l Bart Verheij Araszkiewicz, Trevor Bench-Capon, Enrico Francesconi, and Grabmair Matthias. Thirty years of AI and Law: The first decade
Simone Teufel (1997)
Sentence extraction as a classification task
Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson (2021)
Precedential constraint: the role of issuesProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
H Kelsen (1967)
10.1525/9780520312296Pure theory of law
Laura Manor, Junyi Li (2019)
Plain English Summarization of ContractsArXiv, abs/1906.00424
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1996)
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
D. Wegner (2018)
The Illusion of Conscious WillThe MIT Press
M. Saravanan, Balaraman Ravindran (2010)
Identification of Rhetorical Roles for Segmentation and Summarization of a Legal JudgmentArtificial Intelligence and Law, 18
R. Winkels, A. Boer, R. Hoekstra (2002)
CLIME: Lessons Learned in Legal Information Serving
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2015)
Factors, issues and values: revisiting reasoning with casesProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
C. Reed, Glenn Rowe (2004)
Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and RepresentationInt. J. Artif. Intell. Tools, 13
A. Wyner, T. Engers, A. Hunter (2016)
Working on the argument pipeline: Through flow issues between natural language argument, instantiated arguments, and argumentation frameworksArgument Comput., 7
E. Francesconi (2022)
The winter, the summer and the summer dream of artificial intelligence in lawArtificial Intelligence and Law, 30
Trevor Bench-Capon, M. Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, D. Bourcier, P. Bourgine, Jack Conrad, E. Francesconi, T. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen Leidner, David Lewis, R. Loui, L. McCarty, H. Prakken, Frank Schilder, E. Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, A. Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton, A. Wyner (2012)
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and LawArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
M. Moens (2002)
The MIT Press Journals
C. Hafner, D. Berman (2002)
The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal, and proceduralArtificial Intelligence and Law, 10
Vu Tran, Minh Nguyen, S. Tojo, K. Satoh (2020)
Encoded summarization: summarizing documents into continuous vector space for legal case retrievalArtificial Intelligence and Law, 28
Cor Steging, S. Renooij, Bart Verheij (2021)
Discovering the rationale of decisions: towards a method for aligning learning and reasoningProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Giovanni Sileno, A. Boer, T. Engers
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Revisiting Constitutive Rules
G. Sartor (2005)
Legal Reasoning: A Cognitive Approach to Law
Kevin Ashley (1991)
Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals
K. Greenwood, Trevor Bench-Capon, P. McBurney (2003)
Towards a computational account of persuasion in law
Hiroaki Yamada, Simone Teufel, T. Tokunaga (2019)
Building a corpus of legal argumentation in Japanese judgement documents: towards structure-based summarisationArtificial Intelligence and Law, 27
H. Prakken (2012)
Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semanticsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 20
M. Sergot (2001)
A computational theory of normative positionsACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL), 2
R. Loui, Jeff Norman (1995)
Rationales and argument movesArtificial Intelligence and Law, 3
K. Branting (2004)
A computational model of ratio decidendiArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
H. Prakken (2021)
A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraintArtificial Intelligence and Law, 29
Matteo Pascucci, Giovanni Sileno (2021)
The Search for Symmetry in Hohfeldian Modalities
M. Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, Luke Zettlemoyer (2019)
BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension
J. Hage (1996)
Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic
Lucia Zheng, Neel Guha, Brandon Anderson, Peter Henderson, Daniel Ho (2021)
When does pretraining help?: assessing self-supervised learning for law and the CaseHOLD dataset of 53,000+ legal holdingsProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Nikolaos Aletras, D. Tsarapatsanis, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Vasileios Lampos (2016)
Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspectivePeerJ Comput. Sci., 2
J. Horty (2004)
THE RESULT MODEL OF PRECEDENTLegal Theory, 10
: Argumentation mining. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies
K. Branting, Craig Pfeifer, Bradford Brown, L. Ferro, J. Aberdeen, Brandy Weiss, Mark Pfaff, Bill Liao (2020)
Scalable and explainable legal predictionArtificial Intelligence and Law, 29
P. Dung (1995)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person GamesArtif. Intell., 77
V. Aleven (2003)
Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environmentArtif. Intell., 150
Trevor Bench-Capon (1999)
Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models
Floris Bex, Bart Verheij (2013)
Legal stories and the process of proofArtificial Intelligence and Law, 21
K. Branting (2020)
Explanation in Hybrid, Two-Stage Models of Legal Prediction
G. Schreiber, B. Wielinga, R. Hoog, H. Akkermans, W. Velde (1994)
CommonKADS: a comprehensive methodology for KBS developmentIEEE Expert, 9
J. Raz (1979)
The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and MoralityThe Philosophical Review, 91
Alf Ross, Brian Loar (1968)
Directives and norms
M. Hart (2008)
SOME FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTIONS AS APPLIED IN JUDICIAL REASONING
M Lippi, P Torroni (2016)
Argumentation mining: state of the art and emerging trendsACM Trans Internet Technol, 16
S Teufel, M Moens (2002)
Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical statusComput Linguist, 28
Octavia Sulea, Marcos Zampieri, M. Vela, Josef Genabith (2017)
Predicting the Law Area and Decisions of French Supreme Court CasesArXiv, abs/1708.01681
Masha Medvedeva, M. Wieling, Michel Vols (2022)
Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisionsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 31
Masha Medvedeva, Michel Vols, M. Wieling (2019)
Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human RightsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 28
D. Walton (1995)
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
LT McCarty, A Martino, F Socci (1986)
Permissions and obligations: an informal introductionAutomated analysis of legal texts
A. Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson (2007)
Arguments, Values and Baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Stuart Whittle, Rob Williams, C. Wolfenden (2018)
Noise induced hearing loss: Building an application using the ANGELIC methodologyArgument Comput., 10
Diego Feijó, V. Moreira (2021)
Improving abstractive summarization of legal rulings through textual entailmentArtificial Intelligence and Law, 31
Matthias Grabmair, Kevin Ashley (2011)
Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts
J. Horty (2021)
Modifying the reason modelArtificial Intelligence and Law, 29
(1993)
Trevor Bench-Capon, Frans Coenen, and Paul Orton. Argument-based explanation of the British Nationality Act as a logic program. Information and Communications Technology Law
(2004)
Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Ontologies for Law, volume 12:4
Adithya Renduchintala, Rebecca Knowles, Philipp Koehn, Jason Eisner (2016)
Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)The Association for Computational Linguistics
Bart Verheij (2003)
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentationArtif. Intell., 150
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (2004)
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue GameArtificial Intelligence and Law, 6
A. Valente (1995)
Legal Knowledge Engineering - A Modelling Approach
H. Prakken (2002)
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 10
John Henderson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2019)
Describing the Development of Case LawProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
(2022)
A (2022) Thirty years of AI and law: overviews
H. Prakken (2010)
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured argumentsArgument Comput., 1
J. Hage, R. Leenes, A. Lodder (1993)
Hard cases: A procedural approachArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, P. McBurney (2006)
PARMENIDES: Facilitating Deliberation in DemocraciesArtificial Intelligence and Law, 14
J. Lawrence, C. Reed (2020)
Argument Mining: A SurveyComputational Linguistics, 45
T. Gordon (2008)
Constructing Legal Arguments with Rules in the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF)
(1986)
Permissions and Obligations: An Informal Introduction, pages 307–337
H. Prakken, A. Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson
A Formalisation of Argumentation Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning in Aspic+
Simone Teufel, Marc Moens
Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status
The first issue of Artificial Intelligence and Law journal was published in 1992. This paper provides commentaries on nine significant papers drawn from the Journal’s second decade. Four of the papers relate to reasoning with legal cases, introducing contextual considerations, predicting outcomes on the basis of natural language descriptions of the cases, comparing different ways of representing cases, and formalising precedential reasoning. One introduces a method of analysing arguments that was to become very widely used in AI and Law, namely argumentation schemes. Two relate to ontologies for the representation of legal concepts and two take advantage of the increasing availability of legal corpora in this decade, to automate document summarisation and for the mining of arguments.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Keywords: Reasoning with cases; Argumentation; Ontologies; Document summarisation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.