Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Pande, K. Sharma (1979)
On joint/interface elements and associated problems of numerical ill‐conditioningInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 3
J. Noorzaei, M. Viladkar, P. Godbole (1994)
Nonlinear soil‐structure interaction in plane framesEngineering Computations, 11
G. Dhadse, G. Ramtekkar, G. Bhatt (2021)
Influence due to interface in finite element modeling of soil-structure interaction system: a study considering modified interface elementResearch on Engineering Structures and Materials
(1995)
Modeling and testing of interfaces. Mechanics of geomaterial interfaces
G. Dhadse, G. Ramtekkar, G. Bhatt (2020)
Finite Element Modeling of Soil Structure Interaction System with Interface: A ReviewArchives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28
M. Zaman, C. Desai, E. Drumm (1984)
Interface Model for Dynamic Soil‐Structure InteractionJournal of Geotechnical Engineering, 110
(2017)
Interface elements in geotechnical engineering - some numerical aspects and applications
W. Dong, Liming Hu, Yuzhen Yu, H. Lv (2013)
Comparison between Duncan and Chang's EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill DamJ. Appl. Math., 2013
上杉 守道, 岸田 英明, 椿原 康則 (1988)
BEHAVIOR OF SAND PARTICLES IN SAND-STEEL FRICTION
K. Sharma, C. Desai (1992)
Analysis and Implementation of Thin‐Layer Element for Interfaces and JointsJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 118
C. Desai, M. Zaman, J. Lightner, H. Siriwardane (1984)
Thin‐layer element for interfaces and jointsInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 8
MM Zaman, CS Desai, EC Drumm (1984)
Interface model for dynamic soil-structure interactionJ Geotech Eng, 110
V. Kaliakin, J. Li (1995)
Insight into deficiencies associated with commonly used zero-thickness interface elementsComputers and Geotechnics, 17
R. Day, D. Potts (1994)
Zero thickness interface elements—numerical stability and applicationInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 18
D. Potts, L. Zdravković (1999)
Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering: Theory
J. Noorzaie, W. Thanoon, W. Yeat, P. Pour, Jaafar (2008)
Numerical Modeling of Railway Track Supporting System using Finite-Infinite and Thin Layer ElementsInternational journal of engineering. Transactions A: basics, 22
CS Desai, DB Rigby (1995)
Modeling and testing of interfacesMechanics of geomaterial interfaces
M. Viladkar, A. Zedan, S. Saran (2013)
Non-dimensional correlations for design of eccentrically obliquely loaded footings on cohesionless soilsInternational Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 7
A. Coutinho, M. Martins, R. Sydenstricker, J. Alves, L. Landau (2003)
Simple zero thickness kinematically consistent interface elementsComputers and Geotechnics, 30
M. Viladkar, A. Zedan, S. Saran (2015)
Nonlinear elastic analysis of shallow footings subjected to eccentric inclined loadsGeomechanics and Geoengineering, 10
T. Chandrupatla, A. Belegundu (1990)
Introduction to Finite Elements in Engineering
M. Viladkar, P. Godbole, J. Noorzaei (1994)
Modelling of interface for soil-structure interaction studiesComputers & Structures, 52
G. Bfer (1985)
An isoparametric joint/interface element for finite element analysisInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 21
Performance of Footing-Soil Interaction (FSI) system with thin layer interface is still an active field of research because the behavior of FSI mainly depends on behavior of interface and its influencing thickness. Many researchers performed FSI study with commercially available software with available zero thickness interface element. It has been observed the disadvantages such as numerical ill-conditioning, difficulty in meshing, difficulty in identification of stresses and displacements at junction nodes and unexplored the realistic modeling of physical system. The disadvantages in using zero thickness interfaces have been overcome by implementation of thin layer interface. It is realistic to use thin layer interface because there always a thin shear zone formed in soil just near footing due to displacement of footing/structure. The computational difficulties have been automatically nullified by considering the finite thickness at interface. Also it is very easy to monitor the interface for stress analysis. Thus in order to understand the execution and performance of thin layer interface, this paper focuses on the comparison of zero thickness and thin layer interface in FSI modeling with soil linearity and non-linearity. The output in terms of displacements and stresses at footing-soil interface has been represented for comparison. The results show the effectiveness of thin layer interface as an alternative modeling consideration to zero thickness interfaces for FSI analysis.
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Keywords: Thin layer interface; Zero thickness interface; Finite element analysis; Footing-soil interaction; Material non-linearity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.