Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Neve Gordon (2004)
From the margins of globalization : critical perspectives on human rights
W. Gumede (2007)
Thabo Mbeki and the Battle for the Soul of the ANC
M. Huchzermeyer (2003)
Housing rights in South Africa: Invasions, evictions, the media, and the courts in the cases of Grootboom, Alexandra, and BredellUrban Forum, 14
S. Walsh, P. Bond, Ashwin Desai (2008)
‘Uncomfortable Collaborations’: Contesting Constructions of the ‘Poor’ in South AfricaReview of African Political Economy, 35
A Cornwall (2004)
Participation from tyranny to transformation: Exploring new approaches to participation in development
M Huchzermeyer (2003)
Housing rights in South Africa: Courts in the case of Grootboom, Alexandra, and BredellUrban Forum, 14
Henri Lefebvre (1992)
The production of spaceEconomic Geography, 68
In the South African context, the use of the judiciary as a means through which the poor can access housing and defend themselves from evictions has been addressed by several researchers (see, for example, Huchzermeyer, Urban Forum 14(1):80–106, 2003; Greenstein 2004). While some scholars seem to uncritically assume that the court offers the possibilities for redistribution and for the protection of the rights of marginalised South Africans (Gumede 2005), others, such as Huchzermeyer, have highlighted “the limitations of the judiciary as a route to democratic access to the city” (2003: 80). However, authors have not provided an in-depth analysis of the relationship between the demands made by a community-based organisation and their involvement in a court case. Drawing primarily from in-depth interviews with a community-based organisation in Alexandra called the Wynberg Concerned Residents (WCR) and local government officials involved with the Alexandra Renewal Project (ARP), this article illustrates the process through which the WCR becomes disempowered after its victory in court. Furthermore, it suggests that court cases do not always challenge the amount of resources provided by the state for the local level, in this case the ARP. As a result, victories in court do not necessarily have a positive effect on the living conditions of the poor as a whole. Instead of transforming development through the court system, the court may merely offer a potential means by which to re-manage specific local decisions so that the demands of particular residents can be addressed. The article concludes by offering a possible way forward given the disjuncture between community-based activists and movement theorists.
Urban Forum – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 15, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.