Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Mackay, D. Horton (2003)
Expanding the use of impact assessment and evaluation in agricultural research and developmentAgricultural Systems, 78
H. Brody (2010)
"My Story Is Broken; Can You Help Me Fix It?": Medical Ethics and the Joint Construction of NarrativeLiterature and Medicine, 13
Patti Lather (1993)
FERTILE OBSESSION: Validity After PoststructuralismSociological Quarterly, 34
G. Esteva (1994)
Re‐embedding Food in AgricultureClassical Antiquity, 13
(2000)
A conversation with Wendell Berry
N. K. Denzin (2002)
Exploring Evaluator Role and Identity
G. Esteva (1994)
Re-embedding food in agricultureCulture and Agriculture, 48
(1978)
The case study method in social inquiry
D. Horton (1998)
Disciplinary roots and branches of evaluation: Some lessons from agricultural researchKnowledge and Policy, 10
H. White (1980)
The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of RealityCritical Inquiry, 7
A. Frank (1995)
The Wounded Storyteller
M. LeCompte (1993)
Naming Silenced Lives. Personal Narratives and the Process of Educational Change
E. Guba, Y. Lincoln (1989)
Fourth Generation Evaluation
J. Bruner (1991)
The Narrative Construction of RealityCritical Inquiry, 18
Patti Lather (1986)
Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft placeInterchange, 17
D. Greenwood, M. Levin (2000)
Handbook of Qualitative Research
H. Whyte (1981)
On Narrative
(2000)
Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research
Stephen Crites (1971)
The Narrative Quality of ExperienceJournal of the American Academy of Religion
(1993)
A framework for hearing silence: What does telling stories mean when we are supposed to be doing science
C. Faver (1989)
Sex and Scientific InquiryThe Journal of Higher Education, 60
E. Guba, Y. Lincoln (1981)
Effective Evaluation
Y. Lincoln, E. Guba (1985)
Naturalistic Inquiry
(2002)
Personal E-mail to Yvonna Lincoln
This paper is a report on aconversation held between the authors andcentered on their shared interest inalternative methods of inquiry and evaluationin agriculture. The conversation was initiatedat the W. K. Kellogg Foundation and has evolvedthrough a series of long distanceconversations. Though not a verbatim transcriptof our conversations, this paper represents acomposite of both the face-to-face conversationand our stream of dialogue over the past year.Central to our discussion is an exploration ofthe parallels between the paradigm shift thatoccurred in evaluation in the early 1980s andthe current agricultural paradigm shift beingpromoted by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Inthe course of this conversational paper, wesuggest not only that evaluators andresearchers should cultivate their capacity tohear and tell stories, but also thatagricultural programs and their long-termimpacts could benefit from different kinds ofevaluation efforts. From this perspective, theevaluation or research report is no longer anattempt to mirror reality, but rather it is anevocative story that asks the reader to engagethe storyline morally, emotionally,aesthetically, and intellectually, as well asfrom a social impact perspective. It is ourhope that this paper will serve as what Lather(1993) has called an ``incitement to discourse''in the disciplinary fields of agriculture andevaluation.
Agriculture and Human Values – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 6, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.