Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Neuroinform (2016) 14:129–130 DOI 10.1007/s12021-016-9298-5 EDITORIAL David N. Kennedy Published online: 4 March 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Did you ever feel like your data are your children? register with Facebook (be listed in a public database )? That Each of your children is special, valued and loved, no was a big decision, raising many concerns: Would their iden- matter what they do. They may sometimes get into trou- tify be safe (private health information be protected)? Would ble (not support your hypothesis), and other times be they be bullied (used to show errors in their analysis)? Would the head of their class (get you that high profile publi- they fall in with the ‘wrong’ crowd (be used to refute their own cation). You were excited when each child was con- conclusion)? Would they embarrass you, their parents (turn out ceived (conceived) and proud when each child was born to have errors)? But Facebook had its advantages as well. You (collected). could see your children’s friends (other data they could be You were very close to your children for their first, combined with); what they ‘liked’ and were ‘liked’ by (other formative years (data processing and analysis),
Neuroinformatics – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 4, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.