Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Pothos, N. Chater (2005)
Unsupervised Categorization and Category LearningQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58
Luke Boucher, Z. Dienes (2003)
Two ways of learning associationsCogn. Sci., 27
J. Tenenbaum, T. Griffiths (2001)
Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference.The Behavioral and brain sciences, 24 4
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Comparing Exemplar- and Rule- Based Theories of Categorization
A. Tversky (1977)
Features of SimilarityPsychological Review, 84
U. Hahn, Todd Bailey, Lucy Elvin (2005)
Effects of category diversity on learning, memory, and generalizationMemory & Cognition, 33
Edward Smith, S. Sloman (1994)
Similarity- versus rule-based categorizationMemory & Cognition, 22
EM Pothos, TM Bailey (2000)
The importance of similarity in artificial grammar learningJ Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem, Cogn, 26
M. Goldstein, C. Howson, P. Urbach (1993)
9. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian ApproachJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society, 156
M. Oaksford, N. Chater (1991)
Against Logicist Cognitive ScienceMind & Language, 6
E. Mazets, S. Golenetskii, V. Il’inskii, V. Panov, R. Aptekar', Yu. Gur'yan, M. Proskura, I. Sokolov, Z. Sokolova, T. Kharitonova, A. Dyatchkov, N. Khavenson (1982)
Parts I and II
M. Oaksford, N. Chater, B. Grainger, Joanne Larkin (1997)
Optimal data selection in the reduced array selection task (RAST)Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23
J. Vokey, L. Brooks (1992)
Salience of Item Knowledge in Learning Artificial GrammarsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18
A. Reber (1993)
Implicit learning and tacit knowledge
C. Wallace, D. Boulton (1968)
An Information Measure for ClassificationComput. J., 11
E. Wasserman, Ralph Miller (1997)
What's elementary about associative learning?Annual review of psychology, 48
N. Chater, U. Hahn (1997)
Representational Distortion, Similarity and the Universal Law of Generalization
D. Marr (1983)
Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation
J. Wolff (2004)
Unifying Computing and Cognition: The SP Theory and its ApplicationsArXiv, cs.AI/0401009
B. Love, D. Medin, T. Gureckis (2004)
SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning.Psychological review, 111 2
P. Vitányi, Ming Li (1997)
On Prediction by Data Compression
JR Pomerantz, M Kubovy (1986)
Handbook of perception and human performance. vol. II
R. Solomonoff (1978)
Complexity-based induction systems: Comparisons and convergence theoremsIEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 24
N Chater, CD Manning (2006)
Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisitionTrends Cogn Sci, 10
E. Pothos, R. Ward (2000)
Symmetry, repetition, and figural goodness: an investigation of the Weight of Evidence theoryCognition, 75
G. Miller (1958)
Free recall of redundant strings of letters.Journal of experimental psychology, 56 6
P. Hines, E. Pothos, N. Chater (2007)
A NON-PARAMETRIC APPROACH TO SIMPLICITY CLUSTERINGApplied Artificial Intelligence, 21
RJ Solomonoff (1964)
A formal theory of inductive inference. Parts I and IIInf Control, 7
N. Chater (1997)
Simplicity and the mindPsychologist
S. Vosniadou, A. Ortony (1989)
Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis
J Rissanen (1987)
Stochastic complexityJ Royal Stat Soc Ser B, 49
J. Wolff (2003)
Information Compression by Multiple Alignment, Unification and Search as a Unifying Principle in Computing and CognitionArtificial Intelligence Review, 19
Gerard Wolff (2006)
Unifying Computing and Cognition
H. Shin, R. Nosofsky (1992)
Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 121 3
G. Regehr, L. Brooks (1993)
Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: the priority of holistic individuation.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 122 1
C. Wallace, P. Freeman (1987)
Estimation and Inference by Compact CodingJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 49
N. Chater (1996)
Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization.Psychological review, 103 3
K. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. Thomas (1986)
Handbook of perception and human performance
J. Hochberg, E. McAlister (1953)
A quantitative approach to figural "goodness".Journal of experimental psychology, 46 5
John Anderson, Daniel Bothell, M. Byrne, Scott Douglass, C. Lebiere, Yulin Qin (2004)
An integrated theory of the mind.Psychological review, 111 4
Nick Chater, Christopher Manning (2006)
Special Issue : Probabilistic models of cognition Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition
D Marr (1982)
Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information
E. Pothos, Todd Bailey (2000)
The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 26 4
A. Norenzayan, Steven Heine (2005)
Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know?Psychological bulletin, 131 5
E. Pothos, N. Chater (2002)
A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorizationCogn. Sci., 26
LJ Rips (1989)
Similarity and analogical reasoning
N. Chater, M. Oaksford (1999)
The Probability Heuristics Model of Syllogistic ReasoningCognitive Psychology, 38
R. Baxter, Jonathan Oliver (1994)
MDL and MML: Similarities and differences
J. Rissanen (1978)
Modeling By Shortest Data Description*Autom., 14
J. Pomerantz, Michael Kubovy (1986)
THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION Simplicity and Likelihood Principles
B. Knowlton, L. Squire (1996)
Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 22 1
R. Nosofsky (1989)
Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorizationPerception & Psychophysics, 45
G. Logan (1988)
Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review, 95
L. Rips (1989)
Similarity, typicality, and categorization
D. Mareschal, P. Quinn, R. French (2002)
Asymmetric interference in 3- to 4-month-olds' sequential category learningCogn. Sci., 26
R. Solomonoff (1964)
A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference. Part IIInf. Control., 7
Ming Li, P. Vitányi (1993)
An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications
C. Howson, P. Urbach (1989)
Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach
J. Feldman (2004)
How surprising is a simple pattern? Quantifying “Eureka!”Cognition, 93
N. Chater (1999)
The Search for Simplicity: A Fundamental Cognitive Principle?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52
U. Hahn, N. Chater (1998)
Similarity and rules: distinct? exhaustive? empirically distinguishable?Cognition, 65
T. Meulemans, M. Linden (1997)
Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23
N. Zagoruiko (1984)
Classification and Recognition
P. Helm, E. Leeuwenberg (1996)
Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach.Psychological review, 103 3
J Rissanen (1989)
Stochastic complexity and statistical inquiry
P. Grünwald, I. Myung, M. Pitt (2005)
Advances in Minimum Description Length: Theory and Applications
E. Pothos (2005)
The rules versus similarity distinction.The Behavioral and brain sciences, 28 1
EE Smith, SA Sloman (1994)
Similarity—vs. rule—based categorizationMem Cogn, 22
W. Garner (1974)
The Processing of Information and StructureAmerican Journal of Psychology, 87
P Perruchet, A Vinter, C Pacteau, J Gallego (2002)
The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learningQuart J Exp Psychol, 55A
JN Rouder, R Ratcliff (2006)
Comparing exemplar- and rule-based theories of categorizationCurr Direction Psychol Sci, 15
M. Oaksford, N. Chater (1994)
A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.Psychological Review, 101
M. Posner, S. Keele (1968)
On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of experimental psychology, 77 3
With this paper we wish to present a simplicity (informally ‘simple explanations are the best’) formalism that is easily and directly applicable to modeling problems in cognitive science. While simplicity has been extensively advocated as a psychologically relevant principle, a general modeling formalism has been lacking. The Simplicity and Power model (SP) is a particular simplicity-based framework, that has been supported in machine learning (Wolff, Unifying computing and cognition: the SP theory and its applications, 2006). We propose its utility in cognitive modeling. For illustration, we provide SP demonstrations of the trade-off between encoding with whole exemplars versus parts of stimuli in learning and the effect of wide versus narrow distributions in categorization. In both cases, SP computations show how simplicity can account for these contrasts, in terms of how the frequency of individual exemplars in training compares to the frequency of their constituent parts.
Artificial Intelligence Review – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 21, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.