Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Role of One- and Two-Electron Transfer Reactions in Forming Thermodynamically Unstable Intermediates as Barriers in Multi-Electron Redox Reactions

The Role of One- and Two-Electron Transfer Reactions in Forming Thermodynamically Unstable... In the aquatic geochemical literature, a redox half-reaction is normally written for a multi-electron process (n > 2); e.g., sulfide oxidation to sulfate. When coupling two multi-electron half-reactions, thermodynamic calculations indicate possible reactivity, and the coupled half-reactions are considered favorable even when there is a known barrier to reactivity. Thermodynamic calculations should be done for one or two-electron transfer steps and then compared with known reactivity to determine the rate controlling step in a reaction pathway. Here, thermodynamic calculations are presented for selected reactions for compounds of C, O, N, S, Fe, Mn and Cu. Calculations predict reactivity barriers and agree with one previous analysis showing the first step in reducing O2 to O2 − with Fe2+ and Mn2+ is rate limiting. Similar problems occur for the first electron transfer step in these metals reducing NO3 −, but if reactive oxygen species form or if two-electron transfer steps with O atom transfer occur, reactivity becomes favorable. H2S and NH4 + oxidation in a one-electron transfer step by O2 is also not favorable unless activation of oxygen can occur. H2S oxidation by Cu2+, Fe(III) and Mn(III, IV) phases in two-electron transfer steps is favorable but not in one-electron steps indicating that (nano)particles with bands of orbitals are needed to accept two electrons from H2S. NH4 + oxidation by Fe(III) and Mn(III, IV) phases is generally not favorable for both one- and two-electron transfer steps, but their reaction with hydroxylamine and hydrazine to form N2O and N2, respectively, is favorable. The anammox reaction using hydroxylamine via nitrite reduction is the most favorable for NH4 + oxidation. Other chemical processes including photosynthesis and chemosynthesis are considered for these element–element transformations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Aquatic Geochemistry Springer Journals

The Role of One- and Two-Electron Transfer Reactions in Forming Thermodynamically Unstable Intermediates as Barriers in Multi-Electron Redox Reactions

Luther, George
Aquatic Geochemistry , Volume 16 (3) – Dec 1, 2009
Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/the-role-of-one-and-two-electron-transfer-reactions-in-forming-gDzxQWH0nw

References (62)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Earth Sciences; Hydrogeology ; Geochemistry
ISSN
1380-6165
eISSN
1573-1421
DOI
10.1007/s10498-009-9082-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In the aquatic geochemical literature, a redox half-reaction is normally written for a multi-electron process (n > 2); e.g., sulfide oxidation to sulfate. When coupling two multi-electron half-reactions, thermodynamic calculations indicate possible reactivity, and the coupled half-reactions are considered favorable even when there is a known barrier to reactivity. Thermodynamic calculations should be done for one or two-electron transfer steps and then compared with known reactivity to determine the rate controlling step in a reaction pathway. Here, thermodynamic calculations are presented for selected reactions for compounds of C, O, N, S, Fe, Mn and Cu. Calculations predict reactivity barriers and agree with one previous analysis showing the first step in reducing O2 to O2 − with Fe2+ and Mn2+ is rate limiting. Similar problems occur for the first electron transfer step in these metals reducing NO3 −, but if reactive oxygen species form or if two-electron transfer steps with O atom transfer occur, reactivity becomes favorable. H2S and NH4 + oxidation in a one-electron transfer step by O2 is also not favorable unless activation of oxygen can occur. H2S oxidation by Cu2+, Fe(III) and Mn(III, IV) phases in two-electron transfer steps is favorable but not in one-electron steps indicating that (nano)particles with bands of orbitals are needed to accept two electrons from H2S. NH4 + oxidation by Fe(III) and Mn(III, IV) phases is generally not favorable for both one- and two-electron transfer steps, but their reaction with hydroxylamine and hydrazine to form N2O and N2, respectively, is favorable. The anammox reaction using hydroxylamine via nitrite reduction is the most favorable for NH4 + oxidation. Other chemical processes including photosynthesis and chemosynthesis are considered for these element–element transformations.

Journal

Aquatic Geochemistry – Springer Journals

Published: Dec 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.