Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The strategy for marine development of Russian Federation until 2030 approved by the order of Government of Russian Federation no. 2205-r of
(2013)
Meta-Analysis of Port Impact Studies
Russian regions, Social and economic indices of Russia
(1988)
Okean: resursy i khozyaistvo
A.J. Scott, J. Agnew, E.W. Soja, M. Storper (2001)
Global City Regions. Trends, Theory, Policy
P. Dicken (1998)
Global Shift. Transforming the World Economy
A. Pak, F. Majd (2011)
Integrated coastal management plan in free trade zones, a case studyOcean & Coastal Management, 54
A. Mikhailov (2014)
Geography of international clusters in the Baltic regionBaltic region, 1
P. Taylor (2010)
Specification of the World City NetworkGeographical Analysis, 33
A. Melchior (2010)
Globalisation and the provinces of China: the role of domestic versus international trade integrationJournal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 8
(2004)
Economic potential of coastal area: conceptual definitions and categories
P. Taylor, B. Derudder (2003)
World City Network: A global urban analysis
Unified State System of Information on the Global Ocean
A. Scott, J. Agnew, E. Soja, M. Storper (2001)
Global city regions
O. Merk (2013)
Meta-Analysis of Port Impact Studies, OECD Regional Development Working Paper
(2014)
Modern understading of “geoeconomic position
A. Pak, F. Majd (2011)
Integrated coastal management plan in free trade zonesa case study, Ocean Coastal Manage., 54
A. Anokhin, S. Lachininskii (2015)
Evolution of the ideas and contents of geoeconomic studiesRegional Research of Russia, 5
K. O'Connor (2010)
Global city regions and the location of logistics activityJournal of Transport Geography, 18
(2015)
Sankt-Peterburgskii Primorskii region: geoekonomicheskaya transformatsiya territorii
S.S. Sal’nikov (1984)
Sovetskaya geografiya
S. Lachininskii (2013)
Russia’s energy policy in the Baltic region: a geoeconomic approachBaltic region, 5
S.V. Kuznetsov, S.S. Lachininskii (2014)
Modern understading of “geoeconomic position” and St. Petersburg agglomerationBalt. Reg., 1
(2003)
Theoretical limology: new approaches
Border position as a factor of strategic and territorial planning in Russian Baltic regions
A. Gamble (2014)
The Global Shift
(2012)
Evolution of economic space of Russia in the 21st century: a geoeconomic approach, Vestn
(1984)
Economic geography of the ocean: new prospective direction of economic and social geography, in Sovetskaya geografiya (Soviet Geography)
R. Domanski (2004)
Geografia Ekonomiczna: Ujecie Dynamiczne
(2016)
Druzhinin
Deborah Cowen, N. Smith (2009)
After Geopolitics? : From the Geopolitical Social to GeoeconomicsAntipode, 41
(2004)
Geografia Ekonomiczna: Ujęcie Dynamiczne, Warsaw: Wyd
(2004)
International cross - border territories as an object for geographical studies
S. Sassen (1994)
The City Reader
(2008)
Kontinental’no-okeanicheskaya dikhotomiya v mezhdunarodnom i regional’nom razvitii (Continental–Oceanic
The influence of geoeconomic factors in the spatial pattern of St. Petersburg’s coastal area is analyzed in this paper on a global level taking into account the integration of St. Petersburg and its surroundings into global value-added chains and transportation and logistic schemes; on a macroregional level taking into account the development of the leading port and industrial complexes in the Baltic Sea and the expansion of pipeline projects; an on a local level taking into account the emergence of cross-border clusters, etc. With allowance for the spatial parameters, the boundaries of St. Petersburg’s coastal area are determined; they include the city of St. Petersburg, as well as some municipal districts of Leningrad, Novgorod, and Pskov oblasts, and the Republic of Karelia, in total 37 administrative units with a population of about 7.5 mln people and an area of 110500 km2. A typology is proposed, and geoeconomic elements (transport hubs, complexes, areas) are determined taking into account their spatial configuration, location, and scale of activity. Our case of St. Petersburg’s coastal area describes and analyzes the geoeconomic elements located in the seaside (up to 50 km) and coastal zone (from 50 to 200 km). A particular focus is elements carrying the main geoeconomic burden—seaports. Emerging geoeconomic elements are determined: contact border areas with Finland, Latvia, and Estonia. At the same time, the absence of joint industrial clusters is noted. St. Petersburg’s development prospects as a global city and its impact on the economy of the studied coastal area are shown. The results of the study are visualized with one of the geoinformational products.
Regional Research of Russia – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 16, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.