Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Anderson, J. Ager (1978)
Analysis of Variance in Small Group ResearchPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4
V. Hamilton, R. Hastie, Steven Penrod, N. Pennington (1985)
Inside the Jury.Contemporary Sociology, 14
(1989)
American Law ReportsFederal, 93
E. Wertheim (1986)
Anonymous juriesFordham Law Review, 54
E. Diener (1976)
Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression.Journal of personality and social psychology, 33 5
R. Rogers, S. Prentice-Dunn (1981)
Deindividuation and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41
S. Kassin, L. Wrightsman (1988)
The American Jury on Trial: Psychological Perspectives
L. Festinger, A. Pepitone, T. Newcomb (1952)
Some consequences of de-individuation in a groupThe Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47
J. Cohen (1977)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
D. Kenny, L. Voie (1985)
Separating individual and group effectsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48
K. Hopkins (1982)
The Unit of Analysis: Group Means Versus Individual Observations, 19
J. DeBendictis (1990)
Ruling incognitoAmerican Bar Association Journal, 76
P. Paulus (1981)
Psychology of Group Influence
S. Tanford, Steven Penrod (1986)
Jury Deliberations: Discussion Content and Influence Processes in Jury Decision Making1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16
S. Prentice-Dunn, R. Rogers (1989)
Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior.
F. Cohen (1986)
And then there were none. anonymous juries: An interview with Hearld Price FahringerCriminal Law Bulletin, 1986
J. L. Frost (1992)
Anonymous juries: Juror safety and the rights of criminal defendantsJournal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2
Godfrey Lehman (1968)
What you need to know for jury duty
E. Donnerstein, M. Donnerstein, S. Simon, R. Ditrichs (1972)
Variables in interracial aggression: anonymity, expected retaliation, and a riot.Journal of personality and social psychology, 22 2
D. P. Lehner (1988)
Anonymous juries: Do the benefits warrant jeopardizing the rights of the accused?Criminal Justice Journal, 11
This study examined the effects of anonymity on jurors' verdicts and on jurors' feelings of accountability for their jury's verdicts. Twenty four-person anonymous juries and 20 four-person nonanonymous juries rendered individual and group verdicts for three student defendants charged with selling drugs on a school campus. When unanimous guilty verdicts were reached, juries imposed one of five punishments. Finally, jurors completed postdeliberation opinion and accountability questionnaires. As predicted, anonymous juries showed a higher rate of conviction (70%) than did nonanonymous juries (40%) when the evidence against the defendant was strong, supporting the hypothesis that anonymity would have a greater effect for situations in which there was relatively strong evidence of the defendant's guilt. Anonymous juries imposed the harshest punishment (expulsion) significantly more often than did nonanonymous juries. Contrary to predictions from differential self-awareness theory, anonymous juries did not report feeling less accountable than did nonanonymous juries. However, anonymous juries did see the process as significantly more fair than did identifiable juries.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 2, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.