Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2005)
Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht UniversityHigher Education, 50
(2003)
Development of an instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of teachers in guiding small groupsHigher Education, 46
(2007)
The power of feedbackReview of Educational Research, 77
(2002)
Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptionsAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27
(1996)
The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literatureHigher Education, 32
(2002)
Multidimensional Tracking in Virtual Learning TeamsComputer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community
J Zumbach, M Muehlenbrock, M Jansen, P Reimann, H-U Hoppe (2002)
Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community
(2011)
Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoringAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 16
(2005)
Complex interactions between tutor performance, tutorial group productivity, and the effectiveness of PBL units as perceived by studentsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 10
JW Creswell, VL Plano Clark (2007)
Designing and conducting mixed methods research
(2006)
Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferencesAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 11
(2006)
Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: A process studyMedical Education, 40
(2010)
State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedbackMedical Education, 44
(2011)
Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection toolComputers in Human Behavior, 27
(2007)
The individual collective dialectic in the learning organizationThe Learning Organization, 14
(2003)
Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and researchHandbook of psychology
(2006)
Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Team learning beliefs and behaviorsSmall Group Research, 37
(2010)
Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizationsEducational Research Review, 5
(2011)
The mythology of feedbackHigher Education Research & Development, 30
(2006)
Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teamsSmall Group Research, 37
(1996)
Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist frameworkConstructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design
(2004)
Supporting distributed problem-based learning: The use of feedback mechanisms in online learningCollaborative learning: Theory and practice
(2010)
The effectiveness of peer feedback for learning: The effects of constructiveness, accuracy and embedding in the learning environmentLearning and Instruction, 20
(2010)
Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflectionComputers in Human Behavior, 26
(1997)
The effects of peer feedback on team member motivationGroup & Organization Management, 22
(2010)
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directionsLearning and Instruction, 20
(2011)
Can students adequately evaluate the activities of their peers in PBL?Medical Teacher, 33
(2004)
Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learningLearning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1
(2007)
Peer assessment in problem-based learning: A qualitative studyAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 12
(2010)
Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessmentLearning and Instruction, 20
(1996)
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theoryPsychological Bulletin, 119
J Zumbach, A Hillers, P Reimann (2004)
Collaborative learning: Theory and practice
(Kamp, R. J. A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Van Berkel, H. J. M. & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). The relationship between students’ small group activities, time spent on self-study, and achievement. Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9500-5.)
Kamp, R. J. A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Van Berkel, H. J. M. & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). The relationship between students’ small group activities, time spent on self-study, and achievement. Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9500-5.Kamp, R. J. A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Van Berkel, H. J. M. & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). The relationship between students’ small group activities, time spent on self-study, and achievement. Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9500-5., Kamp, R. J. A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Van Berkel, H. J. M. & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). The relationship between students’ small group activities, time spent on self-study, and achievement. Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9500-5.
RE Slavin, EA Hurley, AM Chamberlain (2003)
Handbook of psychology
(2007)
An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorialsMedical Teacher, 29
(2007)
Assessment of professional behavior in undergraduate medical: Peer assessment enhances performanceMedical Education, 41
(2001)
Peer assessment in problem based learningStudies in Educational Evaluation, 27
(1998)
Motivational and cognitive processes influencing tutorial groupsAcademic Medicine, 73
RA Krueger, MA Casey (2009)
Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research
JR Savery, TM Duffy (1996)
Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design
Within Problem-Based Learning successful learning depends on the quality of cognitive, social and motivational contributions students make to the tutorial group. But at the same time, not all students in PBL automatically contribute in a high quality manner, which might impede successful group functioning. This study investigated whether peer process feedback combined with goal setting can be used to improve the quality of students’ individual contributions. A mixed-methods explanatory design, in which 74 second-year Health Sciences students participated, combined a pre- and posttest with a focus group. The results indicated that the quality of the contributions only increased for students with a below average score on the pre-test. The qualitative data confirmed that the impact of the feedback could be increased by combining individual reflection by means of goal setting with face-to-face discussion. Another suggestion is to investigate whether midterm peer process feedback is more effective for first year students, because they are still developing their tutorial behavior, as opposed to second year students.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 28, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.