Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Kerr, R. MacCoun, Geoffrey Kramer (1996)
Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups.Psychological Review, 103
D. Kenny, C. Judd (1986)
Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 99
Edward Wright, G. Wells (1985)
Does group discussion attenuate the dispositional biasJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 15
V. Hamilton, R. Hastie, Steven Penrod, N. Pennington (1985)
Inside the Jury.Contemporary Sociology, 14
N. Kerr (1993)
Inside the juror: The psychology of decision making
D. Perkins (1985)
Postprimary Education Has Little Impact on Informal Reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77
S. Kassin, L. Wrightsman (1988)
The American Jury on Trial: Psychological Perspectives
P. Tetlock (1983)
Accountability and complexity of thought.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
S. M. Scariano, J. M. Davenport (1987)
The effects of independence assumptions in the one-way ANOVAAmerican Statistician, 41
Narina Nuñez, M. McCoy, Holly Clark, L. Shaw (1999)
The Testimony of Elderly Victim/Witnesses and Their Impact on Juror Decisions: The Importance of Examining Multiple StereotypesLaw and Human Behavior, 23
D. Kuhn, Michael Weinstock, Robin Flaton (1994)
How Well Do Jurors Reason? Competence Dimensions of Individual Variation in a Juror Reasoning TaskPsychological Science, 5
Jeffrey Kerwin, D. Shaffer (1994)
Mock Jurors Versus Mock Juries: The Role of Deliberations in Reactions to Inadmissible TestimonyPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20
Stephen Scariano, J. Davenport (1987)
The effects of violations of independence assumptions in the one-way ANOVAThe American Statistician, 41
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
P. Ellsworth (1989)
Are Twelve Heads Better Than OneLaw and contemporary problems, 52
N. Kerr (1993)
Stochastic models of juror decision making.
M. Kaplan, L. Miller (1978)
Reducing the effects of juror bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
L. Forsterlee, I. Horowitz (1997)
Enhancing Juror Competence in a Complex TrialApplied Cognitive Psychology, 11
P. Koller, R. Kaplan (1978)
A Two-Process Theory of Learned Helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
J. Stevens (1993)
Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences
D. A. Schum, A. W. Martin (1993)
Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making
Garrett Berman, B. Cutler (1996)
Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision-makingJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
D. Kuhn, Leona Schauble, Merce Garcia-Mila (1992)
Cross-Domain Development of Scientific ReasoningCognition and Instruction, 9
J. Abramson (1994)
We, the jury
(1987)
First degree murder trial
D. Kuhn (1991)
The skills of argument
L. Wrightsman (1987)
Psychology and the legal system
D. Schum, Anne Martin (1982)
Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence.Law & Society Review, 17
B. Cutler, H. Dexter, Steven Penrod (1989)
Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysisBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 7
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1986)
Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
P. Lachenbruch (1989)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84
R. Hastie (1993)
Inside the juror: Models of juror decision making
R. Hastie (1993)
Inside the juror
D. Kuhn (1989)
Children and adults as intuitive scientists.Psychological review, 96 4
I. Horowitz, L. Forsterlee, Ian Brolly (1996)
Effects of trial complexity on decision makingJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
H. Bernstein, D. Horowitz, David Lange, H. Powell, Melvin Shimm, J. Weistart, R. Danner, Claire Germain, B. Baccari, Lisa Eichhorn, James Farrin, K. Cashion, Steven Chabinsky, Thomas Contois, James Glenister, Stephen Armitage, J. Cannon, C. Connolly, David Dabbs, Katherine Flanagan, P. Franklin, Donald Nielsen, Christopher Hart, Charles North, William O'Neil, Jane Schaefer, Eric Lieberman, Janet Moore, A. Walsh, Raymond Wierciszewski (1990)
LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS
A. Goldstein, H. Kalven, H. Zeisel, Thomas Callahan, P. Ennis (1966)
The American JuryLaw & Society Review, 1
The effect of jury deliberation on jurors' reasoning skill in a murder trial was examined. Specifically, the effect of deliberating on reasoning competence (as defined by Kuhn, Weinstock and Flaton, 1994) was explored. One hundred and four participants viewed a videotaped murder trial and either deliberated in 12-person juries or ruminated on the case individually. Among those assigned to juries, half had their reasoning skill assessed prior to deliberations, while the others were tested after deliberating. Jurors in the individual rumination condition were assessed after they had the opportunity to reflect on the case alone. As hypothesized, post-group-deliberation jurors were more likely to discount both the selected verdict and alternative theories and incorporate judgmental supporting statements than were the other mock jurors. However, the mock jurors did not differ with regard to making statements that supported alternative verdicts or including judgmental statements that discounted their chosen verdict. In terms of Kuhn's reasoning continuum from satisficing (low level) to theory–evidence coordination (high level), there is some evidence that post-group-deliberation jurors may be closer to the high end than predeliberation jurors or post-individual-rumination jurors in some aspects of the task, but not in others.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.