Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Morahan-Martin (2004)
How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural ReviewCyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society, 7 5
A. Pérez, U. Couto (2002)
[Readability of health web pages for patients and readers among the general population].Revista espanola de salud publica, 76 4
J. Calderón, Ashraf Zadshir, K. Norris (2004)
Structure and content of chronic kidney disease information on the World Wide Web: barriers to public understanding of a pandemic.Nephrology news & issues, 18 11
Christina Zarcadoolas, Mercedes Blanco, J. Boyer, A. Pleasant (2002)
Unweaving the Web: An Exploratory Study of Low-Literate Adults' Navigation Skills on the World Wide WebJournal of Health Communication, 7
(2004)
Addressing health disparities: African American consumer information resources on the web
G. Peterson, P. Aslani, Kylie Williams (2003)
How do Consumers Search for and Appraise Information on Medicines on the Internet? A Qualitative Study Using Focus GroupsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 5
L. Rozmovits, S. Ziebland (2004)
What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs.Patient education and counseling, 53 1
F. Gattoni, C. Sicola (2005)
How to evaluate the quality of health related websites.La Radiologia medica, 109 3
B. Sadan (2002)
Patient empowerment and the asymmetry of knowledge.Studies in health technology and informatics, 90
V. Dreger, T. Tremback (2002)
Optimize patient health by treating literacy and language barriers.AORN journal, 75 2
M. Boulos (2005)
British internet-derived patient information on diabetes mellitus: is it readable?Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 7 3
M. Holmes-Rovner, S. Stableford, A. Fagerlin, John Wei, R. Dunn, J. Ohene-Frempong, Karen Kelly-Blake, D. Rovner (2005)
Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain languageBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 5
J. Smart, D. Burling (2001)
Radiology and the internet: a systematic review of patient information resources.Clinical radiology, 56 11
J. Blair (2004)
Assessing the value of the internet in health improvement.Nursing times, 100 35
A. Pérez, U. Couto (2002)
Legibilidad de las páginas web sobre salud dirigidas a pacientes y lectores de la población generalRevista Espanola De Salud Publica, 76
D. Friedman, L. Hoffman‐Goetz, J. Arocha (2004)
Readability of cancer information on the internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 19 2
Mehret Birru, R. Steinman (2004)
Online Health Information and Low-Literacy African AmericansJournal of Medical Internet Research, 6
C. Nichols, M. Oermann (2005)
An evaluation of bariatric Web sites for patient education and guidance.Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, 28 2
Anne Kittler, J. Hobbs, L. Volk, Gary Kreps, D. Bates (2004)
The Internet as a Vehicle to Communicate Health Information During a Public Health Emergency: A Survey Analysis Involving the Anthrax Scare of 2001Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6
M. Britt, Gareth Gabrys (2002)
Implications of document-level literacy skills for Web site designBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34
R. Cline, K. Haynes (2001)
Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art.Health education research, 16 6
Derek Hansen, Holly Derry, P. Resnick, C. Richardson (2003)
Adolescents Searching for Health Information on the Internet: An Observational StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 5
Erin Griffin, K. McKenna, Linda Worrall (2004)
Stroke Education Materials on the World Wide Web: An Evaluation of Their Quality and SuitabilityTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11
Mehret Birru, V. Monaco, Lonelyss Charles, Hadiya Drew, V. Njie, Timothy Bierria, E. Detlefsen, R. Steinman (2004)
Internet Usage by Low-Literacy Adults Seeking Health Information: An Observational AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research, 6
A. Hart, F. Henwood, S. Wyatt (2004)
The Role of the Internet in Patient-Practitioner Relationships: Findings from a Qualitative Research StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 6
DA DeWalt, ND Berkman, S Sheridan, KN Lohr, MP Pignone (2004)
Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literatureJ Gen Int Med, 19
J. Jaffery, B. Becker (2004)
Evaluation of eHealth web sites for patients with chronic kidney disease.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 44 1
(2002)
Adult literacy in America: a first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Center for Education, U.S
T. Davis, M. Wolf (2004)
Health literacy: implications for family medicine.Family medicine, 36 8
Background. Recent growth and use of the internet as a source of health information has raised concerns about consumers’ ability to comprehend this information. Although health scholars argue that writing web pages at an eighth-grade level or lower will help patients, few studies involve actual readers to investigate the effects of improved readability scores on partient’s perceptions of this information.Methods. This study examines American consumer evaluations of web pages written at different grade reading levels. In spring of 2005, a community-wide intercept survey was performed in a regional hub city in southeastern Ohio. Five hundred nineteen participants were randomly assigned to receive one of three messages discussing lung cancer prevention: one written at the eighth grade level, one at the ninth grade level, and one at the fist year college level. Independentt-tests were conducted to compare the messages on measures of perceived trustworthiness, truthfulness, readability, and completeness.Results. Improving the reading level of online information had no significant effect on consumers’ evaluations of the messages’ readability or completeness, nor a consistent effect on the perceived truthfulness or trustworthiness of the message.Conclusions. The results suggest that by simply changing the readability level of online information may not improve consumers; evaluation of the quality of health information on the internet. The authors offer alternative possibilities for why some sources of online health information may be seen as more valuable than others.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 2007
Keywords: Health Information; American Cancer Society; Reading Level; Online Information; Readability Score
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.