Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jack Lee, K. Sudhir, J. Steckel (2002)
A Multiple Ideal Point Model: Capturing Multiple Preference Effects from within an Ideal Point FrameworkJournal of Marketing Research, 39
Ahmet Kirca, S. Jayachandran, W. Bearden (2005)
Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Impact on PerformanceJournal of Marketing, 69
J. Utterback, W. Abernathy (1975)
A dynamic model of process and product innovationOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 3
R. Jacobson, D. Aaker (1987)
The Strategic Role of Product QualityJournal of Marketing, 51
M. Lindell, D. Whitney (2001)
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 1
K. M. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchAcademy of Management Review, 14
Clayton Christensen (2013)
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
W. DeSarbo, Rajdeep Grewal, Y. Wind (2006)
Who Competes with Whom? A Demand-Based Perspective for Identifying and Representing Asymmetric Competition
Rajdeep Grewal, Joseph Cote, H. Baumgartner (2004)
Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory TestingMarketing Science, 23
Gilbert Churchill (1979)
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing ConstructsJournal of Marketing Research, 16
N. Malhotra, Sung Kim, Ashutosh Patil (2006)
Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past ResearchManag. Sci., 52
Barton Weitz, H. Sujan, M. Sujan (1986)
Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior : a framework for improving selling effectivenessJournal of Marketing, 50
D. J. Teece (1992)
Competition, cooperation and innovationJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18
T. Robertson, H. Gatignon (1998)
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATIONStrategic Management Journal, 19
Rashi Glazer (1991)
Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an AssetJournal of Marketing, 55
Rajdeep Grewal, P. Tansuhaj (2001)
Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic FlexibilityJournal of Marketing, 65
J. S. Conant, M. P. Mokwa, P. Rajan Varadarajan (1990)
Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based studyStrategic Management Journal, 11
R. Subramanian, P. Gopalakrishna (2001)
The market orientation-performance relationship in the context of a developing economy: An empirical analysisJournal of Business Research, 53
Peter Dickson, James Ginter (1987)
Market Segmentation, Product Differentiation, and Marketing StrategyJournal of Marketing, 51
Peter Dickson (1996)
The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan's Comparative Advantage TheoryJournal of Marketing, 60
Bernard Jaworski, Ajay Kohli (1993)
Market Orientation: Antecedents and ConsequencesJournal of Marketing, 57
Riliang Qu, C. Ennew (2005)
Developing a Market Orientation in a Transitional Economy: The Role of Government Regulation and Ownership StructureJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24
O. Walker, Robert Ruekert (1987)
Marketing's Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual FrameworkJournal of Marketing, 51
G. Day, P. Nedungadi (1994)
Managerial Representations of Competitive AdvantageJournal of Marketing, 58
R. Miles, C. Snow, A. Meyer, H. Coleman (1978)
Organizational strategy, structure, and process.Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 3 3
Ken Matsuno, J. Mentzer (2000)
The Effects of Strategy Type on the Market Orientation–Performance RelationshipJournal of Marketing, 64
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
D. A. Belseley, E. Kuh, R. E. Welsch (1980)
Regression diagnostics
D. Aaker (1984)
Strategic Market Management
C. Noble, Rajiv Sinha, Ajith Kumar (2002)
Market Orientation and Alternative Strategic Orientations: A Longitudinal Assessment of Performance ImplicationsJournal of Marketing, 66
C. Moorman, Anne Miner (1997)
The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and CreativityJournal of Marketing Research, 34
J. Conant, M. Mokwa, P. Varadarajan (1990)
Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures‐based studySouthern Medical Journal, 11
E. Tauber (1974)
How market research discourages major innovationBusiness Horizons, 17
D. McKee, P. Varadarajan, W. Pride (1989)
Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent PerspectiveJournal of Marketing, 53
R. Achrol, T. Reve, L. Stern (1983)
The Environment of Marketing Channel Dyads: A Framework for Comparative AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 47
G. Day, R. Wensley (1988)
Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive SuperiorityJournal of Marketing, 52
A. Gupta, S. Raj, D. Wilemon (1986)
A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation ProcessJournal of Marketing, 50
A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, L. Berry (1985)
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future ResearchJournal of Marketing, 49
L. Phillips (1981)
Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in MarketingJournal of Marketing Research, 18
Eric Olson, O. Walker, Robert Ruekert (1995)
Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness.Journal of Marketing, 59
H. Mintzberg (1979)
The structuring of organizations
Jin Han, Namwoon Kim, R. Srivastava (1998)
Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?Journal of Marketing, 62
Robert Stern, J. Pfeffer, G. Salancik (1979)
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.Contemporary Sociology, 8
Douglas Vorhies, Neil Morgan (2003)
A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing PerformanceJournal of Marketing, 67
John Narver, S. Slater (1990)
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business ProfitabilityJournal of Marketing, 54
S. Slater, John Narver (1993)
Product‐market Strategy and Performance: An Analysis of the Miles and Snow Strategy TypesEuropean Journal of Marketing, 27
Franklin Houston (1986)
The Marketing Concept: What it is and What it is NotJournal of Marketing, 50
Allan Shocker, V. Srinivasan (1974)
A Consumer-Based Methodology for the Identification of New Product IdeasManagement Science, 20
R. Lusch, Gene Laczniak (1987)
The Evolving Marketing Concept, Competitive Intensity and Organizational Performance:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15
Subhash Sharma, R. Durand, Oded Gur-Arie (1981)
Identification and Analysis of Moderator VariablesJournal of Marketing Research, 18
W. Kamakura, R. Srivastava (1986)
An Ideal-Point Probabilistic Choice Model for Heterogeneous PreferencesMarketing Science, 5
C. Moorman (1995)
Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product OutcomesJournal of Marketing Research, 32
Amy Kristof (1996)
PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONSPersonnel Psychology, 49
D. Dillman (1979)
Mail and telephone surveys : the total design methodSocial Forces, 11
J. K. H. Lee, K. Sudhir, J. H. Steckel (2002)
A multiple desired point model: Capturing multiple preference effects from within an desired point frameworkJMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 39
Ajay Kohli, Bernard Jaworski, Ajith Kumar (1993)
Markor: A Measure of Market OrientationJournal of Marketing Research, 30
P. Lawrence, J. Lorsch (1967)
Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration
M. Novit (1979)
The retirement amendments: Why the concern?Business Horizons, 22
David Miller (1988)
Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance ImplicationsAcademy of Management Journal, 31
S. Slater, John Narver (1994)
Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?:Journal of Marketing, 58
D. Teece (1992)
Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological ProgressJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18
R. Hayes, S. Wheelwright (1984)
Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing
Stephen Mcdaniel, J. Kolari (1987)
Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Strategic TypologyJournal of Marketing, 51
Eric Olson, S. Slater, T. Hult (2005)
The Performance Implications of Fit among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic BehaviorJournal of Marketing, 69
K. Appiah-Adu (1998)
Market Orientation and Performance: Do the Findings Established in Large Firms Hold in the Small Business Sector?Journal of Euromarketing, 6
Robert Ruekert, O. Walker, Kenneth Roering (1985)
The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and PerformanceJournal of Marketing, 49
P. Khandwalla (1977)
The design of organizations
F. Webster (1988)
The rediscovery of the marketing conceptBusiness Horizons, 31
Ajay Kohli, Bernard Jaworski (1990)
Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial ImplicationsJournal of Marketing, 54
Existing studies of market orientation have hypothesized that the strength of the market orientation/performance relationship depends on environmental variables such as market turbulence, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. To date most empirical studies have failed to confirm these hypotheses; however, these studies (1) assumed that performance is a linear function of the achieved level of market orientation and (2) tested whether environmental uncertainty moderates this relationship. A complementary explanation for the impact of environmental variables on a firm’s market orientation arises from studies of organizational behavior that link the need for coordination and control to environmental uncertainty and organizational strategy. Building on this perspective, the authors argue that (1) environmental uncertainty influences the desired level of market orientation and (2) the gap between the desired and achieved levels of market orientation influence business unit performance. The authors test these hypotheses with data collected from multiple respondents in 308 US firms. The data analysis confirms that the desired level of market orientation is a function of market turbulence, competitive intensity, technological turbulence, and innovation strategy. In addition, the desired level of market orientation positively influences the achieved level. Finally, when the achieved level of market orientation is less than the desired level, business unit performance is a negative function of the gap between the desired and achieved levels of market orientation.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 8, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.