Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Schurle, B. Erven (1979)
The return-risk tradeoffs associated with processing tomato production in northwestern Ohio
G. H. Sullivan, R. Y. Uyeshiro (1970)
Cost analysis of mechanical harvesting and bulk handling tomatoes for processing in the Midwest. Research Bulletin 869
P. Downs, B. Rice, J. Vandermeer, K. Yih (1979)
Migrant workers, farmer, and the mechanization of agriculture: the tomato industry in OhioScience for the People, 11
J. Vandermeer (1982)
Science and Class Conflict: the role of agricultural research in the midwest tomato industryStudies in Marxism, 12
B. Velasquez (1980)
The farmworker struggle: a debate by letter
G. E. Wilcox, G. H. Sullivan (1973)
Costs and returns from alternate harvesting methods for processing tomatoesHort. Science, 8
G. H. Sullivan, G. E. Wilcox, R. Y. Uyeshiro, J.L. Robertson (1974)
Precipitation and the economic feasibility of harvest mechanization for processing tomatoesHort. Science, 9
B. Schurle (1977)
An analysis of the return-risk tradeoffs associated with tomato production in northwestern Ohio /
L. Traub (1971)
Economic factors affecting Ohio's processing tomato harvest and supply /
B. W. Schurle, B. L. Erven (1979)
The return-risk tradeoffs associated with processing tomato production in Northwestern Ohio. Research Bulletin 1111
The Confrontation Between Processors and Farm Workers in the Midwest Tomato Industry and the Role of the Agricultural Research and Extension Establishment Peter M. Rosset and John H. Vandermeer Peter M. Rosset has a Ph.D. in agricultural ecology from the University of Michigan. In 1986 and early 1987 he was a Fulbright Senior Lecturer at the Advanced Institute for Agricultural Sciences in Managua, Nicaragua. He is cur- rently the coordinator for Costa Rica of the Central Ameri- can Regional IPM Program of the Center for Research and Education on Tropical Agriculture (CATIE). Introduction of the systematic misrepresentation of facts. There is a confrontation between labor and Mechanization benefits processors by eliminat- capital in the processing tomato industry in the ing labor problems (e.g., strikes, boycotts), and Midwestern United States. This conflict is be- perhaps by lowering the cost per ton they must tween migrant farmworkers and processors, potentially pay for tomatoes, but it creates un- with the role of the growers little more than that employment for farmworkers, forces small-scale of foremen or managers on their own land. In growers out of the processing business, and pro- the first part of this paper we elaborate this duces decreased profit
Agriculture and Human Values – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 5, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.