Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/the-cheating-and-intention-of-a-partner-as-determinants-of-evaluative-pzeaErSHQw
References (13)
-
D. McCann, N. Prentice (1973)
The facilitating effects of money and moral set on the moral judgment of adolescent delinquents.Journal of abnormal psychology, 82 1
-
N. Prentice (1972)
The influence of live and symbolic modeling on promoting moral judgment of adolescent delinquents.Journal of abnormal psychology, 80 2
-
J. Piaget (1932)
The Moral Judgment of the Child -
Philip Cowan, Jonas Longer, Judith Heavenrich, Marjorie Nathanson (1969)
Social learning and Piaget's cognitive theory of moral development.Journal of personality and social psychology, 11 3
-
E. Turiel (1966)
An experimental test of the sequentiality of developmental stages in the child's moral judgments.Journal of personality and social psychology, 3 6
-
A. Bandura, F. Mcdonald (1963)
INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT AND THE BEHAVIOR OF MODELS IN SHAPING CHILDREN'S MORAL JUDGMENTS.Journal of abnormal psychology, 67
-
J. Savitsky, J. Babl (1976)
Cheating, intention, and punishment from an equity theory perspectiveJournal of Research in Personality, 10
-
J. Garrett, W. L. Libby (1973)
Intention and chance reward allocations in the dyad as determinants of equityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28
-
J. Garrett, W. Libby (1973)
Role of Intentionality in Mediating Responses to Inequity in the Dyad.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28
-
G. Heisler (1974)
Ways to deter law violators: Effects of levels of threat and vicarious punishment on cheating.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42
-
G. Hill (1934)
Cheating among delinquent boysJournal of Juvenile Research, 18
-
N. M. Prentice (1972)
The influence of live and symbolic modeling on promoting moral judgments of adolescent juvenile delinquentsJournal of Abnormal Psychology, 80
-
W. Hudgins, N. Prentice (1973)
Moral judgment in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescents and their mothers.Journal of abnormal psychology, 82 1
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright
- Subject
- Psychology; Child and School Psychology; Neurosciences; Public Health
- ISSN
- 0091-0627
- eISSN
- 1573-2835
- DOI
- 10.1007/BF00917761
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Male juvenile offenders were asked to evaluate the work of an experimental partner (confederate) who completed a work task four times. The work partner cheated on two trials and did not cheat on two trials while working for a charity (one cheat and one noncheat trial) or for selfish gain (one cheat and one noncheat trial). It was found that subjects rated the work done on cheating trials lower than work done on noncheating trials. In addition, subjects shared less reward money on cheating trials relative to noncheating trials. However, the intentions of the confederate, defined as the reward recipient, failed to affect subjects' judgments. These results were described as supporting previous studies which have indicated that delinquents fail to take account of others' intentions when making moral judgments.
Journal
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 16, 2004