Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2000)
Characters , homology and three - item analysis
E. Mavrodiev, A. Madorsky (2012)
TAXODIUM Version 1.0: A Simple Way to Generate Uniform and Fractionally Weighted Three-Item Matrices from Various Kinds of Biological DataPLoS ONE, 7
(1978)
Biological systematics: principles and applications, 2nd edn
G Nelson (1994)
Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology
R. Thorne, G. Nelson, D. Rosen, N. Platnick (1981)
Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and VicarianceBioScience
M. Cummings (2004)
PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)]Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
J. Bousquets, J. Morrone (2005)
Regionalización biogeográfica en Iberoamérica y tópicos afines
W. Hennig (2002)
Phylogenetic Systematics
Stéphane Guindon, Jean-François Dufayard, Vincent Lefort, M. Anisimova, W. Hordijk, O. Gascuel (2010)
New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0.Systematic biology, 59 3
Knut Finstermeier, D. Zinner, M. Brameier, M. Meyer, Eva Kreuz, M. Hofreiter, C. Roos (2013)
A Mitogenomic Phylogeny of Living PrimatesPLoS ONE, 8
F. Lapointe, G. Cucumel (1997)
THE AVERAGE CONSENSUS PROCEDURE: COMBINATION OF WEIGHTED TREES CONTAINING IDENTICAL OR OVERLAPPING SETS OF TAXASystematic Biology, 46
E. Mavrodiev, O. Yurtseva (2017)
“A character does not make a genus, but the genus makes the character”: three-taxon statement analysis and intuitive taxonomyEuropean journal of taxonomy, 2017
Mark Miller, W. Pfeiffer, Terri Schwartz (2010)
Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE)
F. Ronquist, J. Huelsenbeck (2003)
MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed modelsBioinformatics, 19 12
S. Lehtonen, I. Sääksjärvi, K. Ruokolainen, H. Tuomisto (2011)
Who is the closest extant cousin of humans? Total‐evidence approach to hominid phylogenetics via simultaneous optimizationJournal of Biogeography, 38
J Felsenstein (1973)
Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete charactersSyst Zool, 22
E. Mavrodiev (2016)
Dealing with propositions, not with the characters: the ability of three-taxon statement analysis to recognise groups based solely on ‘reversals’, under the maximum-likelihood criteriaAustralian Systematic Botany, 29
E. Mavrodiev, Christopher Dell, L. Schroder (2017)
A laid-back trip through the Hennigian ForestsPeerJ, 5
RT Schuh, AVZ Brower (2009)
Biological systematics: principles and applications
W. Amonette, K. English, K. Ottenbacher (2010)
Nullius in VerbaSports Medicine, 40
I. Kitching (1998)
Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis
P. Waddell, M. Steel (1997)
General time-reversible distances with unequal rates across sites: mixing gamma and inverse Gaussian distributions with invariant sites.Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 8 3
(1997)
Lapointe and Levasseur 2004) that applied to the forests of minimal trees (3TSs), as described in Mavrodiev et al
David Williams, M. Ebach (2016)
What is Intuitive Taxonomic Practise?Systematic biology
M. Anisimova, O. Gascuel (2006)
Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative.Systematic biology, 55 4
Valentin Rineau, R. Bagils, M. Laurin (2018)
Impact of errors on cladistic inference: simulation-based comparison between parsimony and three-taxon analysisContributions to Zoology, 87
Vincent Lefort, Jean-Emmanuel Longueville, O. Gascuel (2017)
SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyMLMolecular Biology and Evolution, 34
(2012)
FigTree v. 1.4. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology
J. Farris (2004)
The Logical Basis of Phylogenetic Analysis
E. Wiley, B. Lieberman (2011)
Phylogenetics : the theory of phylogenetic systematics
R. Scotland, R. Pennington (2014)
Homology and systematics : coding characters for phylogenetic analysis
G. Schwarz (1978)
Estimating the Dimension of a ModelAnnals of Statistics, 6
E. Mavrodiev, David Williams, M. Ebach (2019)
On the Typology of RelationsEvolutionary Biology, 46
C. Creevey, J. McInerney (2009)
Trees from trees: construction of phylogenetic supertrees using clann.Methods in molecular biology, 537
B. Rannala, Ziheng Yang (1996)
Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inferenceJournal of Molecular Evolution, 43
E. Wiley (1981)
Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics
G. Nelson (2011)
Resemblance as Evidence of AncestryZootaxa, 2946
F. Lapointe, Claudine Levasseur (2004)
Everything You always wanted to Know about the Average Consensus, and More
(1983)
standard (conventional) MP approach
FJ Lapointe, C Levasseur (2004)
Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the Tree of Life. Computational biology series
P. Lewis (2001)
A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data.Systematic biology, 50 6
CJ Creevey, JO McInerney (2009)
Springer protocols: methods in molecular biology. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis
P. Perelman, W. Johnson, C. Roos, H. Seuánez, J. Horvath, M. Moreira, B. Kessing, J. Pontius, M. Roelke, Y. Rumpler, M. Schneider, Artur Silva, S. O’Brien, J. Pecon-Slattery (2011)
A Molecular Phylogeny of Living PrimatesPLoS Genetics, 7
J. Felsenstein (1973)
Maximum Likelihood and Minimum-Steps Methods for Estimating Evolutionary Trees from Data on Discrete CharactersSystematic Biology, 22
David Williams, M. Ebach (2007)
Foundations of systematics and biogeography
Wayne Maddison, D. Maddison, D. Maddison (2009)
Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6
(2004)
Clan: construction of supertrees and exploration of phylogenomic information from partially overlapping datasets (version 3.0). The lab
DM Williams, DJ Siebert (2000)
Homology and systematics: coding characters for phylogenetic analysis. Systematics Association Special Volume (Book 58)
David Williams, M. Ebach (2005)
Drowning by numbers: Rereading Nelson’s “Nullius in Verba”The Botanical Review, 71
(2004)
Inferring phylogenies
David Williams, M. Ebach (2008)
Homology and Systematics
G. Nelson, N. Platnick (1991)
THREE‐TAXON STATEMENTS: A MORE PRECISE USE OF PARSIMONY?Cladistics, 7
Phylogenetic systematics (e.g., cladistics) is one of the most important analytical frameworks of modern Biology. It seems to be common knowledge that within phylogenetics, ‘groups’ must be defined based solely on the synapomorphies or on the “derived” characters that unite two or more taxa in a clade or monophyletic group. Thus, the idea of synapomorphy seems to be of fundamental influence and importance. Here I will show that the most common and straightforward understanding of synapomorphy as a shared derived character is not sufficient and eventually must be rejected in favor of Nelson’s relational interpretation of such term. Arguing for this point and using three examples from previously published Apes’ genomic matrices, I explicitly demonstrate that the relationship (Pongo (Gorilla (Homo, Pan))) with Hylobatidae as a sister taxon, may be successfully recovered by three-taxon statement analysis (3TA) and three-taxon statement average consensus analysis (3TS-ACA) even if all of the evident standard shared derived molecular characters of the relationship (Pongo (Gorilla (Homo, Pan))) with Hylobatidae as a sister taxon, have been excluded from the molecular alignments. Neither conventional Maximum Parsimony nor Maximum Likelihood or Bayesian Inference can do this in such situation. Thus, our results show that the relationship (Pongo (Gorilla (Homo, Pan))) with Hylobatidae as a sister taxon has appeared, in some way, behind standard shared derived characters: the last ones could be excluded, but the relationship remains the same.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.