Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jonathan Oskvarek, S. Braunstein, J. Farnan, M. Ferguson, O. Hahn, T. Henderson, Susan Hong, S. Levine, C. Rosenberg, D. Golden (2016)
Medical Student Knowledge of Oncology and Related Disciplines: a Targeted Needs AssessmentJournal of Cancer Education, 31
N. Pavlidis, J. Vermorken, R. Stahel, J. Bernier, A. Cervantes, G. Pentheroudakis, R. Audisio, A. Costa (2012)
Undergraduate training in oncology: an ESO continuing challenge for medical students.Surgical oncology, 21 1
Expected New Cancer Cases and Deaths in 2020
Ashley Meilleur, S. Subramanian, Jesse Plascak, J. Fisher, E. Paskett, E. Lamont (2013)
Rural Residence and Cancer Outcomes in the United States: Issues and ChallengesCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 22
Laura Levit, E. Balogh, S. Nass, P. Ganz (2014)
Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis
M. Mattes, Krishnan Patel, L. Burt, A. Hirsch (2015)
A Nationwide Medical Student Assessment of Oncology EducationJournal of Cancer Education, 31
M. Barton, R. Simons (1999)
A survey of cancer curricula in Australian and New Zealand medical schools in 1997Medical Journal of Australia, 170
J. Kwan, J. Nyhof-Young, P. Catton, M. Giuliani (2015)
Mapping the future: towards oncology curriculum reform in undergraduate medical education at a Canadian medical school.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 91 3
MB Barton, RG Simons (1999)
A survey of cancer curricula in Australia and New Zealand medical schools in 1997. Oncology Education Committee of the Australian Cancer SocietyMed J Aust, 170
Delivering a cohesive oncology curriculum to medical students is challenging due to oncology’s multidisciplinary nature, predominantly outpatient clinical setting, and lack of data describing effective approaches to teaching it. We sought to better characterize approaches to oncology education at US medical schools by surveying third and fourth year medical students who serve on their institution’s curriculum committee. We received responses from students at 19 schools (15.2% response rate). Key findings included the following: (1) an under-emphasis of cancer in the curriculum relative to other common diseases; (2) imbalanced involvement of different clinical subspecialists as educators; (3) infrequent requirements for students to rotate through non-surgical oncologic clerkships; and (4) students are less confident in their knowledge of cancer treatment compared to basic science/natural history or workup/diagnosis. Based on these findings, we provide several recommendations to achieve robust multidisciplinary curriculum design and implementation that better balances the clinical and classroom aspects of oncology education.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 7, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.