Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Kerr, R. MacCoun, Geoffrey Kramer (1996)
Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups.Psychological Review, 103
Christy Visher (1987)
Juror decision makingLaw and Human Behavior, 11
B. Reskin, Christy Visher (1986)
The Impacts of Evidence and Extralegal Factors in Jurors' DecisionsLaw & Society Review, 20
K. Klein, S. Kozlowski (2000)
Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions
Franziska Marquart, Brigitte Naderer (1988)
Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude changeAmerican Journal of Psychology, 101
D. Baldus, G. Woodworth, David Zuckerman, N. Weiner (1998)
Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty in the Post-Furman Era: An Empirical and Legal Overview with Recent Findings from PhiladelphiaCornell Law Review, 83
M. Myers (1979)
Rule Departures and Making Law: Juries and Their VerdictsLaw & Society Review, 13
T. Moore (2006)
Review of Psychology and Law: An Empirical Perspective.Canadian Psychology, 47
D. Chadee (1996)
Race, trial evidence and jury decision making.
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1986)
Communication and persuasion
T Eisenberg, PL Hannaford-Agor, VP Hans, NL Waters, GT Munsterman, SJ Schwab (2005)
Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American JuryJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2
N. Kerr (1978)
Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
LM Levett, EM Danielsen, MB Kovera, BL Cutler (2005)
Psychology and law: An empirical perspective
Paula Hannaford-Agor, V. Hans (2003)
Nullification at Work? A Glimpse from the National Center for State Courts Study of Hung JuriesChicago-Kent} Law Review, 78
Lora Levett, E. Danielsen, M. Kovera, B. Cutler (2005)
The Psychology of Jury and Juror Decision Making.
J. Ogloff (2002)
Taking Psychology and Law into the Twenty-First Century
P. Bliese (2000)
Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
R. Mazzella, A. Feingold (1994)
The Effects of Physical Attractiveness, Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Gender of Defendants and Victims on Judgments of Mock Jurors: A Meta‐Analysis1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24
M. Brewer (2007)
The importance of being we: human nature and intergroup relations.The American psychologist, 62 8
T. Mitchell, Ryann Haw, J. Pfeifer, C. Meissner (2005)
Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant TreatmentLaw and Human Behavior, 29
A. Eagly, S. Chaiken (1993)
The psychology of attitudes.Journal of Marketing Research, 34
N. Kerr, R. Hymes, Alonzo Anderson, J. Weathers (1995)
Defendant-juror similarity and mock joror judgmentsLaw and Human Behavior, 19
L Heuer, SD Penrod (1994)
Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effectLaw and Human Behavior, 18
MJ Saks (1997)
What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions?Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 6
L. Sweeney, C. Haney (1992)
The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies.Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 10
Michael Heise (2004)
Criminal Case Complexity: An Empirical PerspectiveJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1
Larry Heuer, Steven Penrod (1994)
Trial complexityLaw and Human Behavior, 18
D. Abrams, M. Hogg (1991)
Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances.Contemporary Sociology, 20
Dennis Devine, Laura Clayton, Benjamin Dunford, Rasmy Seying, Jennifer Pryce (2001)
Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7
José Marques (1990)
The black sheep effect: outgroup homogeneity in social comparison settings
Carol Werner, M. Strube, A. Cole, D. Kagehiro (1985)
The Impact of Case Characteristics and Prior Jury Experience on Jury Verdicts1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15
PL Hannaford-Agor, VP Hans, NL Mott, GT Munsterman (2002)
Are hung juries a problem?
N. Steblay, Jasmina Besirevic, S. Fulero, Belia Jimenez-Lorente (1999)
The Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Juror Verdicts: A Meta-Analytic ReviewLaw and Human Behavior, 23
W. Bowers, Benjamin Steiner, M. Sandys (2001)
Death Sentencing in Black and White: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Jurors' Race and Jury Racial CompositionUniversity of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 3
Tanya Taylor, H. Hosch (2004)
An Examination of Jury Verdicts for Evidence of a Similarity-Leniency Effect, an Out-Group Punitiveness Effect or a Black Sheep EffectLaw and Human Behavior, 28
T. Eisenberg, Paula Hannaford-Agor, V. Hans, Nicole Waters, G. Munsterman, Stewart Schwab, M. Wells (2004)
Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven & Zeisel's The American JurySocial Science Research Network
D. Baldus, C. Pulaski, G. Woodworth (1983)
Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia ExperienceJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 74
Dennis Devine, Kristi Olafson, Larita Jarvis, Jennifer Bott, Laura Clayton, Jami Wolfe (2004)
Explaining Jury Verdicts: Is Leniency Bias for Real?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34
Luther Swygert (1983)
Chicago-Kent Law Review
E. Greene, S. Chopra, M. Kovera, Steven Penrod, V. Rose, R. Schuller, C. Studebaker (2002)
Jurors and juries: A review of the field.
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1981)
Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
A. Goldstein, H. Kalven, H. Zeisel, Thomas Callahan, P. Ennis (1966)
The American JuryLaw & Society Review, 1
To examine relationships between strength of evidence (SOE) and extraevidentiary variables in the context of Kalven and Zeisel’s (The American Jury, 1966) liberation hypothesis, post-trial questionnaire data were collected from judges, attorneys, and jurors associated with 179 criminal jury trials. SOE ratings were strongly correlated with jury verdicts on the three most serious charges against the defendant, and several extraevidentiary variables (i.e., pretrial publicity, trial complexity, charge severity, and foreperson demographics) were moderately correlated with verdicts. Extraevidentiary-verdict relationships remained significant when SOE was controlled, although extraevidentiary variables yielded only modest improvement in classification accuracy beyond SOE. In partial support of the liberation hypothesis, several case-related extraevidentiary variables were significantly related to jury verdicts only when the prosecution’s evidence was rated as moderately strong.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 11, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.