Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Standards notes

Standards notes ture for use in a collections documentation system," and why not? Minimum Information It seems that the problem is that some members of the drafting team Categories for Museum wanted to have all museum informa- Objects tion fit into these categories while CIDOC is circulating MICMO: others were truly trying to find a min- Minimum Information Categories for imum. The result is neither and not Museum Documentation for com- likely to satisfy anyone. A true mini- ment and holding public discussions mum would be very useful to unique- of it at the Washington, DC meeting ly identify, locate, and account for in late August. MICMO is a objects, but it would definitely be "proposed guideline for an interna- expressed as mandatory fields for a tional standard," or so it says on the database and it would have man- title page, but what exactly is a datory data value controls. This is proposed guideline for an interna- something more, and therefore less. tional standard? While this looks [For copies contact Toni Petersen at like a guideline for documentation it the Art and Architecture Thesaurus, doesn't seem to be a guideline for a 62 Stratton Rd., 14filliamstown MA standard. Indeed, it http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives and Museum Informatics Springer Journals

Standards notes

Archives and Museum Informatics , Volume 8 (2): 7 – Jun 1, 1994
Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/standards-notes-eaO1BIIy23

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
1994 Archives & Museum Informatics
ISSN
1042-1467
eISSN
1573-7500
DOI
10.1007/BF02770331
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ture for use in a collections documentation system," and why not? Minimum Information It seems that the problem is that some members of the drafting team Categories for Museum wanted to have all museum informa- Objects tion fit into these categories while CIDOC is circulating MICMO: others were truly trying to find a min- Minimum Information Categories for imum. The result is neither and not Museum Documentation for com- likely to satisfy anyone. A true mini- ment and holding public discussions mum would be very useful to unique- of it at the Washington, DC meeting ly identify, locate, and account for in late August. MICMO is a objects, but it would definitely be "proposed guideline for an interna- expressed as mandatory fields for a tional standard," or so it says on the database and it would have man- title page, but what exactly is a datory data value controls. This is proposed guideline for an interna- something more, and therefore less. tional standard? While this looks [For copies contact Toni Petersen at like a guideline for documentation it the Art and Architecture Thesaurus, doesn't seem to be a guideline for a 62 Stratton Rd., 14filliamstown MA standard. Indeed, it

Journal

Archives and Museum Informatics – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.