Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Poplin (1988)
The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the presentLearning Disability Quarterly, 7
P. Ackerman, RoscoeA. Dykman (1993)
Phonological Processes, Confrontational Naming, and Immediate Memory in DyslexiaJournal of Learning Disabilities, 26
J. Torgesen (1996)
A model of memory from an information processing perspective: The special case of phonological memory.
I. Y. Liberman, D. Shankweiler, A. M. Liberman (1989)
Phonology and reading disability
(1994)
Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities: Position papers and statements
Eleanor Higgins, M. Raskind (1999)
Speaking to Read: The Effects of Continuous vs. Discrete Speech Recognition Systems on the Reading and Spelling of Children with Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Special Education Technology, 15
P. Fischer (1999)
Getting up to speedPerspectives, 25
M. Wolf, Lynne Miller, Katharine Donnelly (2000)
Retrieval, Automaticity, Vocabulary Elaboration, Orthography (RAVE-O)Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33
B. Wise, J. Ring, Richard Olson (1999)
Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation.Journal of experimental child psychology, 72 4
A. Snelbaker, G. Wilkinson, G. Robertson, J. Glutting (2001)
Wide Range Achievement Test 3 ( wrat3 )
B. Cope, M. Kalantzis (1993)
The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing
J. K. Torgesen (1995)
Attention, memory, and executive function: Issues in conceptualization and measurement
I. Lundberg, Å. Olofsson (1993)
Can computer speech support reading comprehensionComputers in Human Behavior, 9
M. Poplin (1988)
The Reductionistic Fallacy in Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 21
J. Worthy (1996)
A Matter of Interest: Literature That Hooks Reluctant Readers and Keeps Them Reading.The Reading Teacher, 50
M. Denckla, R. Rudel (1976)
Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilitiesNeuropsychologia, 14
(2000)
The quicktionary reading pen
(1998)
Kurzweil 3000TM
M. Meyer, F. Wood, L. Hart, R. Felton (1998)
Selective Predictive Value of Rapid Automatized Naming in Poor ReadersJournal of Learning Disabilities, 31
S. Engelmann, L. Meyer, G. Johnson, L. Carnine (1998)
Corrective reading skill applications. (Decoding B1, B2, and C)
J. Torgesen, Ann Alexander, R. Wagner, C. Rashotte, K. Voeller, T. Conway (2001)
Intensive Remedial Instruction for Children with Severe Reading DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 34
J. Mitchell (2001)
Comprehensive Test of Phonological ProcessingAssessment for Effective Intervention, 26
E. Fry, J. Kress (1984)
The reading teacher's book of lists
D. Fuchs, L. Fuchs, Loulee Yen, Kristen McMaster, Ebba Svenson, Nancy Yang, Caresa Young, P. Morgan, Tracy Gilbert, J. Jaspers, M. Jernigan, Esther Yoon, Sophia King (2001)
Developing First-Grade Reading Fluency through Peer MediationTeaching Exceptional Children, 34
M. Wolf, L. Miller, K. Donnelly (2000)
Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention programJournal of Learning Disabilities, 33
R. Olson, B. Wise (1992)
Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedbackReading and Writing, 4
B. Wise, J. Ring, Richard Olson (2000)
Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading.Journal of experimental child psychology, 77 3
S. Graham, Victoria Voth (1990)
Spelling InstructionIntervention in School and Clinic, 25
R. Wagner, J. Torgesen, C. Rashotte (1994)
Development of Reading-Related Phonological Processing Abilities: New Evidence of Bidirectional Causality from a Latent Variable Longitudinal Study.Developmental Psychology, 30
C. Perfetti, Isabel Beck, L. Bell, C. Hughes (1987)
Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children.Merrill-palmer Quarterly, 33
I. Lundberg, Jørgen Frost, Ole-Peter Petersen (1988)
Effects of an Extensive Program for Stimulating Phonological Awareness in Preschool Children.Reading Research Quarterly, 23
E. L. Higgins, M. H. Raskind (2000)
Speaking to read: A comparison of continuous vs. discrete speech recognition in the remediation of learning disabilitiesJournal of Special Education Technology, 15
Jacob Cohen (1969)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesThe SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design
S. J. Samuels (1984)
Reading education: Foundations for a literate America
P. Bowers (1993)
Text Reading and Rereading: Determinants of Fluency beyond Word RecognitionJournal of Literacy Research, 25
Verena Thaler, E. Ebner, H. Wimmer, K. Landerl (2004)
Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained wordsAnnals of Dyslexia, 54
S. Stahl, K. Heubach, B. Crammond (1997)
Fluency-oriented reading instructionReading Research Report, 79
Linda Hecker, L. Burns, L. Katz, J. Elkind, Kenneth Elkind (2002)
Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disordersAnnals of Dyslexia, 52
J. Elkind, K. Cohen, C. Murray (1993)
Using computer-based readers to improve reading comprehension of students with dyslexiaAnnals of Dyslexia, 43
E. Ball, B. Blachman (1988)
Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readinessAnnals of Dyslexia, 38
D. Wechsler (1974)
Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised
L. Heshusius (1984)
Why Would They and I Want to Do It? A Phenomenological-Theoretical View of Special EducationLearning Disability Quarterly, 7
R. Hillerich (1978)
A writing vocabulary of elementary children
P. M. Cunningham, D. P. Hall (1994)
Making words
B. Fulk (1997)
Think While You SpellTEACHING Exceptional Children, 29
D. Wechsler (1991)
Wechsler intelligence scale for children-III
J. Torgesen, R. Wagner, C. Rashotte (1997)
Prevention and Remediation of Severe Reading Disabilities: Keeping the End in MindComponents of Effective Reading Intervention
J. L. Wiederholt (1986)
Formal reading inventory
M. Wolf, Tami Katzir-Cohen (2001)
Reading Fluency and Its InterventionScientific Studies of Reading, 5
S. Graham, V. P. Voth (1990)
Spelling instruction: Making modifications for students with learning disabilitiesAcademic Therapy, 25
J. K. Torgesen, A. W. Alexander, R. K. Wagner, C. A. Rashotte, K. K. Voeller, T. Conway (2001)
Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approachesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 34
M. Gerber, R. Hall (1989)
Cognitive-Behavioral Training in Spelling for Learning Handicapped StudentsLearning Disability Quarterly, 12
M. W. Lovett, L. Lacerenza, S. L. Borden (2000)
Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 33
M. K. Henry, N. C. Redding (1996)
Patterns for success in reading and spelling: A multisensory approach to teaching phonics and word analysis
Steven Stahl, Kathleen Heubach (2005)
Fluency-Oriented Reading InstructionJournal of Literacy Research, 37
R. Felton (1993)
Effects of Instruction on the Decoding Skills of Children with Phonological-Processing ProblemsJournal of Learning Disabilities, 26
M. Raskind, Eleanor Higgins (1999)
Speaking to read: The effects of speech recognition technology on the reading and spelling performance of children with learning disabilitiesAnnals of Dyslexia, 49
C. E. Crowell, D. Mosenfelder (1993)
Reading attainment system
L. Mohr (1995)
Teaching Diverse Learners in Inclusive Settings: Steps for Adapting Instruction.
C. Spring, Linda Perry (1983)
Naming speed and serial recall in poor and adequate readersContemporary Educational Psychology, 8
B. M. Fulk (1997)
Think while you spell: A cognitive motivational approach to spelling instructionTeaching Exceptional Children, 29
Patricia Mathes (1994)
Increasing Strategic Reading Practice with Peabody Classwide Peer Tutoring.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9
Eleanor Higgins, M. Raskind (1997)
The Compensatory Effectiveness of Optical Character Recognition/Speech Synthesis on Reading Comprehension of Postsecondary Students with Learning DisabilitiesLearning Disabilities: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 8
P. Fischer (1995)
Speed drills for decoding automaticity
A. S. Kaufman, N. L. Kaufman (1998)
Kaufman test of educational achievement
(2000)
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level [computer software]
C. Bereiter, M. J. Adams, M. Pressley, M. Rait, R. Case, A. McKeough, J. Hirshberg, M. Scardamalia, A. Brown, J. Campione, I. Carruthers, G. H. Treadway (2000)
Open court
B. Foorman, D. Francis, J. Fletcher, C. Schatschneider, P. Mehta (1998)
The Role of Instruction in Learning To Read: Preventing Reading Failure in At-Risk Children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90
J. Torgesen, R. Wagner-Bastmeyer, C. Rashotte, J. Torgeson (1999)
Test of Word Reading Efficiency
P. G. Bowers (1993)
Text reading and rereading: Predictors of fluency beyond word recognitionJournal of Reading Behavior, 25
M. Raskind, Eleanor Higgins, Nora Slaff, Tobey Shaw (1998)
Assistive Technology in the Homes of Children with Learning Disabilities: An Exploratory Study.Learning Disabilities: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 9
C. Leong (1992)
Enhancing reading comprehension with text-to-speech (DECtalk) computer systemReading and Writing, 4
M. Lovett, Léa Lacerenza, Susan Borden (2000)
Putting Struggling Readers on the PHAST TrackJournal of Learning Disabilities, 33
M. W. Lovett, S. L. Borden, L. Lacerenza, N. J. Benson, D. Brackstone (1994)
Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically and strategy-based reading training programsJournal of Educational Psychology, 30
M. S. Meyer, F. B. Wood, L. A. Hart, R. H. Felton (1998)
The selective predictive values in rapid automatized naming within poor readersJournal of Learning Disabilities, 31
J. Torgesen, R. Wagner, C. Rashotte, E. Rose, P. Lindamood, T. Conway, C. Garvan (1999)
Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 91
I. Lundberg (1995)
The Computer as a Tool of Remediation in the Education of Students with Reading Disabilities—A Theory-Based ApproachLearning Disability Quarterly, 18
N. Hall, R. Price (1998)
Explode the code
Peter Hatcher, C. Hulme, A. Ellis (1994)
Ameliorating Early Reading Failure by Integrating the Teaching of Reading and Phonological Skills: The Phonological Linkage HypothesisChild Development, 65
I. Brown, R. Felton (1990)
Effects of instruction on beginning reading skills in children at risk for reading disabilityReading and Writing, 2
M. Lovett (1994)
Treating the Core Deficits of Developmental Dyslexia: Evidence of Transfer of Learning after Phonologically- and Strategy-Based Reading Training Programs.Developmental Psychology, 30
C. Rashotte, J. Torgesen (1985)
Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children.Reading Research Quarterly, 20
J. K. Torgesen, R. K. Wagner, C. A. Rashotte (1997)
Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mindScientific Studies of Reading, 1
This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of two programs developed by the Frostig Center Research Department to improve the reading and spelling of students with learning disabilities (LD): a computer Speech Recognition-based Program (SRBP) and a computer and text-based Automaticity Program (AP). Twenty-eight LD students with reading and spelling difficulties (aged 8 to 18) received each program for 17 weeks and were compared with 16 students in a contrast group who did not receive either program. After adjusting for age and IQ, both the SRBP and AP groups showed significant differences over the contrast group in improving word recognition and reading comprehension. Neither program showed significant differences over contrasts in spelling. The SRBP also improved the performance of the target group when compared with the contrast group on phonological elision and nonword reading efficiency tasks. The AP showed significant differences in all process and reading efficiency measures.
Annals of Dyslexia – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 9, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.