Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. W. Eichler (1890)
Syllabus der Vorlesungen über spezielle und medizinisch-pharmaceutische BotanikÖst. bot. Z., 97
H. H. Thomas (1936)
Palaeobotany and the Origin of the AngiospermsBot. Rev., 11
R. Wettstein (1907)
Die Entwicklung der Blüte der angiospermen Pflanzen aus derjenigen der AngiospermenDas Wissen für alle, Jahrg. 1907, no. 45
A. Meeuse (1963)
From ovule to ovary: A contribution to the phylogeny of the megasporangiumActa Biotheoretica, 16
H. Hallier (1905)
PROVISIONAL SCHEME OF THE NATURAL (PHYLOGENETIC) SYSTEM OF FLOWERING PLANTS.New Phytologist, 4
H. Lam (1947)
A new system of the CormophytaBlumea, 6
A. Rendle (1926)
The Classification of Flowering PlantsNature, 117
H. Hallier (1902)
Beiträge zur Morphogenie der Sporophylle und des Trophophylls in Beziehung zur Phylogenie der KormophytenJb. Hamburger wiss. Anst., 19
G. Henslow (1890)
On the Vascular Systems of Floral Organs, and their Importance in the Interpretation of the Morphology of Flowers.Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 28
E. A. N. Arber, J. Parkin (1907)
On the origin of AngiospermsJ. Linn. Soc, Bot., 38
Th. Eckardt (1937)
Untersuchungen über Morphologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte und systematische Bedeutung des pseudomonomeren GynoeceumsNova Acta Leop. Carol. (N.F. 5), 26
H. Thomas (1957)
PLANT MORPHOLOGY AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE FLOWERING PLANTS
G. Karsten (1918)
Zur Phylogenie der AngiospermenZ. Bot., 10
A. D. J. Meeuse (1972)
Palm & Pandan pollination: primary anemophily or primary entomophily ?Botanique (India), 3
J. Parkin (1957)
The unisexual flower again. A criticismPhytomorphology, 7
L. Plantefol (1948)
L'ontogénie de la fleur. Fondements d'une théorie florale nouvelleAnn. Sci. nat., Bot., 11me sér., 9
E. Newell, BOTANiCAL Gazette (1908)
Origin of AngiospermsBotanical Gazette, 46
J. Goethe (1973)
Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären
P. Maheshwari, V. Vasil (1961)
Bot. Monogr. no. 1
L. Emberger (1964)
L'inflorescence vue sous l'angle dynamique et phylogénétique, 111
H. H. Thomas (1934)
The structure and origin of the stigma. A contribution towards a new morphological interpretation of the Angiosperm flowerNew Phytol., 33
H. H. Thomas (1958)
Paleobotany and the evolution of the Flowering PlantsProc. Linn. Soc. Lond., 169
F. Fagerlind (1944)
Strobilus und Blüte vonGnetum, und die Möglichkeit aus ihrer Struktur den Blütenbau der Angiospermen zu deutenArk. Bot. 33a, no. 8
O. Rohweder (1967)
Karpellbau und Syncarpie bei RanunculaceenBer. Schweiz. bot. Ges., 77
H. Lam (1948)
Classification and the new morphologyActa Biotheoretica, 8
R. Nozeran (1955)
Contributions à l'étude de quelques structures florales (Essai de morphologie florale comparée)Ann. Sci. nat. Bot., 11me sér., 16
H. J. Lam (1950)
Stachyospory and Phylospory as Factors in the natural System of the CormophytaSvensk bot. Tidskr., 44
A. Meeuse (1964)
THE BITEGMIC SPERMATOPHYTIC OVULE AND THE CUPULE — A RE‐APPRAISAL OF THE SO‐CALLED PSEUDO‐MONOMEROUS OVARY, 13
P. Leins (1964)
Das zentripetale und zentrifugale AndroeceumBer. dtsch. bot. Ges., 77
H. Hallier (1912)
L'origine et la système phylétique des angiospermesArch. néerl. Sci. III B (Sci. Nat.), 1
L. Croizat (1964)
Thoughts on high systematics, phylogeny and floral morphology, with a note on the origin of theAngiospermaeCandollea, 19
A. Meeuse (1965)
Angiosperms, past and present : phylogenetic botany and interpretative floral morphology of the flowering plants
G. Senn (1904)
Die Grundlagen des Hallierschen AngiospermensystemsBeih. Bot. Zbl., 17
A. Meeuse (1971)
INTERPRETATIVE GYNOECIAL MORPHOLOGY OF THE LACTORIDACEAE AND THE WINTERACEAE — A RE-ASSESSMENT, 20
Sir Hutchinson (1960)
The families of flowering plantsAIBS Bulletin, 10
V. Grégoire (1938)
La morphogénèse et l'autonomie morphologique de l'appareil floral. I. La CarpelleCellule, 47
E. Arber, J. Parkin (1908)
Studies on the Evolution of the AngiospermsThe Relationship of the Angiosperms to the GnetalesAnnals of Botany
R. Melville (1963)
A new Theory of the Angiosperm Flower. II. The AndroeciumKew Bull., 17
A. D. J. Meeuse (1971)
Interpretative gynoecial morphology of theLactoridaceae and theWinteraceaeActa bot. neerl., 20
L. J. Čelakovský (1876)
Vergleichende Darstellung der Plazenten in den Fruchtknoten der PhanerogamenAbh. böhm. Ges. Wiss., ser. VI, 8
H. Thomas (1958)
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: Palaeobotany and the Evolution of the Flowering Plants., 169
R. Melville (1962)
A New Theory of the Angiosperm Flower. I. The GynoeciumKew Bull., 16
H. Thomas (1934)
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF THE STIGMANew Phytologist, 33
A. Eames (1931)
THE VASCULAR ANATOMY OF THE FLOWER WITH REFUTATION OF THE THEORY OF CARPEL POLYMORPHISMAmerican Journal of Botany, 18
G. Henslow (1890)
On the vascular systems of floral organs, and their importance in the interpretation of the morphology of flowersJ. Linn. Soc. Bot., 28
H. J. Lam (1962)
La morphologie nouvelle et son influence sur nos notions du système des cormophytesBiologie du XXme siècle, 6
A. Arber (1937)
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE FLOWER: A STUDY OF SOME ASPECTS OF MORPHOLOGICAL THOUGHTBiological Reviews, 12
R. Melville (1962)
A New Theory of the Angiosperm Flower: IIKew Bulletin, 16
H. Neumayer (1924)
Die Geschichte der BlüteAbh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 14
H. H. Thomas (1935)
On the concepts of plant morphology with special reference to views and comments on the nature of the angiospermic carpelNew Phytol., 34
O. Hagerup (1936)
Zur Abstammung einiger Angiospermen durchGnetales undConiferae II.CentrospermaeK. danske vidensk. Selsk., Biol. Medd., 13
L. Emberger (1950)
La valeur morphologique et l'origine de la fleur (à propos d'une théorie nouvelle)Année biol. III, 54
F. Fagerlind (1958)
Is the gynoecium of the Angiosperms built up in accordance with the phyllosporous or the stachyosporous scheme ?Svensk bot. Tidskr., 52
A. Meeuse (1972)
Angiosperm phylogeny, floral morphology and pollination ecologyActa Biotheoretica, 21
A. Eames (1961)
Morphology of the angiosperms
V. Grant (1959)
ORIGINS OF ANGIOSPERMOUS PLANTSEvolution, 13
A. Meeuse (1963)
THE SO‐CALLED “MEGASPOROPHYLL” OF CYCAS — A MORPHOLOGICAL MISCONCEPTION. ITS BEARING ON THE PHYLOGENY AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE CYCADOPHYTA, 12
B. Moeliono (1970)
Cauline or carpellary placentation among dicotyledons : (Axis-borne versus leaf-borne ovules)
Th. Eckardt (1957)
Vergleichende Studie über die morphologischen Beziehungen zwischen Fruchtblatt, Samenanlage und Blütenachse bei einigen Angiospermen, zugleich als kritische Beleuchtung der “New-morphology”Neue Hefte z. Morphol., 3
F. Delpino (1888–1896)
Applicazione di nuovi criterii per la classificazione delle piante, I–VI.-IMem. Accad. Bologna ser. 4, 9
T. A. Sprague (1925)
The classification of Dicotyledons. I. General principlesJ. Bot. (London), 63
O. Hagerup (1934)
Zur Abstammung einiger Angiospermen durchGnetales undConiferaeK. danske vidensk. Selsk., Biol. Medd., 11
C. Barnard (1961)
The Interpretation of the Angiosperm Flower(Pres. Address A.N.Z.A.A.S.) Aust. J. Sci., 24
H. Thomas (1935)
ON THE CONCEPTS OF PLANT MORPHOLOGYNew Phytologist, 34
J. McLean Thompson (1937)
On the place of ontogeny in floral inquiryPubl. Hartley Bot. Labs Lpool Univ., 12
Van Tieghem, P. Léon
Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur l'anatomie comparée de la fleur
R. Melville (1960)
A New Theory of the Angiosperm FlowerNature, 188
H. Thomas (1931)
The Early Evolution of the AngiospermsAnnals of Botany
V. Grégoire (1935)
Sporophylles et organes floraux, tige et axe floralRec. Trav. bot. néerl., 32
C. Bessey
The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants
A. Eames (1951)
AGAIN: ‘THE NEW MORPHOLOGY’New Phytologist, 50
J. Long (1966)
XIV.—Some Lower Carboniferous Fructifications from Berwickshire, together with a Theoretical Account of the Evolution of Ovules, Cupules, and CarpelsTransactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 66
L. Emberger (1951)
L'origine de la fleurExperientia, 7
A. Meeuse (1966)
THE HOMOLOGY CONCEPT IN PHYTOMORPHOLOGY—SOME MOOT POINTS, 15
O. Rohweder (1967)
Centrospermen-Studien. 2. Entwicklung und morphologische Deutung des Gynöciums beiPhytolaccaBot. Jb., 86
N. V. Pervuchina (1967)
The pollination of the primary Angiosperms and the evolution of modes of pollination. (in Russ. w. Eng. summary)Bot. Zh. (Moscow), 52
L. Celakovský
Über den phylogenetischen Entwickelungsgang der Blüthe und über den Ursprung der Blumenkrone
E. Janchen (1950)
Die Herkunft der Angiospermen-Blüte und die Systematische Stellung der ApetalenÖst. bot. Z., 97
A. D. J. Meeuse (1963)
Stachyospory, Phyllospory and MorphogenesisAdvancing Front. Plant Sci., 13
A critical appraisal of the theories founded on the theorem of the multiaxial flower (traditionally but erroneously referred to as the ‘pseudanthium hypotheses’), shows an evolution fromWettstein's original version of 1907 to various hypotheses founded on the the same theme and partly derived from the Wettsteinian doctrine. A number of circumstances such as semantic inconsistencies, but principally the choice of inadequate archetypes, prevented the success of the theory of a polystachyous floral region, because the deductions and interpretations emanating from this concept were not sufficiently convincing to defeat the opposed theory of the uniaxial euanthous flower or anthostrobilus hypothesis. Only after the amendation of the theory of a multiaxial reproductive region on the basis of the anthocorm concept can one arrive at a plausible idea of the evolution of the angiospermous flower which is compatible with all aspects of the phylogeny of the Flowering Plants (such as the sex distribution and the mode of pollination), and with the floral morphology and anatomy of the various kinds of flowers.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 9, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.