Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jindong Qin, Xinwang Liu (2014)
An approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on Maclaurin symmetric mean operatorsJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 27
Zeshui Xu (2007)
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation OperatorsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15
G. Wei, Yu Wei (2018)
Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applicationsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33
G. Wei, Mao Lu (2018)
Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision makingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33
Xunjie Gou, Zeshui Xu (2016)
Exponential operations for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and interval numbers in multi-attribute decision makingFuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16
M. Akram, Farwa Ilyas, Harish Garg (2019)
Multi-criteria group decision making based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy informationSoft Computing, 24
N. Li, Harish Garg, Lei Wang (2019)
Some Novel Interactive Hybrid Weighted Aggregation Operators with Pythagorean Fuzzy Numbers and Their Applications to Decision MakingMathematics
Xiaolu Zhang, Zeshui Xu (2014)
Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy SetsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29
Harish Garg (2018)
Generalised Pythagorean fuzzy geometric interactive aggregation operators using Einstein operations and their application to decision makingJournal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30
Shouzhen Zeng, Jianping Chen, Xingsen Li (2016)
A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision MakingInt. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 15
Xunjie Gou, Zeshui Xu, Qian Lei (2015)
New operational laws and aggregation method of intuitionistic fuzzy informationJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30
Hui Gao, Mao Lu, G. Wei, Yu Wei (2018)
Some Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Interaction Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision MakingFundam. Informaticae, 159
L. Zadeh (1996)
Fuzzy sets
Zeshui Xu, R. Yager (2011)
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Bonferroni MeansIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 41
Harish Garg (2020)
Linguistic Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision-making ProcessCognitive Computation, 12
Harish Garg (2018)
New logarithmic operational laws and their aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy set and their applicationsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
R. Yager (2014)
Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision MakingIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22
Harish Garg (2019)
Novel neutrality operation–based Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision analysisInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma (1997)
Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted informationIEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A, 27
Xiaolu Zhang (2016)
A Novel Approach Based on Similarity Measure for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Group Decision MakingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31
Harish Garg (2017)
Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its applicationEng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 60
Zeshui Xu, R. Yager (2006)
Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy setsInternational Journal of General Systems, 35
R. Yager, A. Abbasov (2013)
Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision MakingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28
Harish Garg (2018)
New exponential operational laws and their aggregation operators for interval‐valued Pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria decision‐makingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33
Xindong Peng, Yong Yang (2015)
Some Results for Pythagorean Fuzzy SetsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 30
Harish Garg, K. Kumar (2018)
A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theoryArtificial Intelligence Review, 53
S. De, R. Biswas, A. Roy (2000)
Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy setsFuzzy Sets Syst., 114
LA Zadeh (1965)
10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-XInf Control, 8
KT Atanassov (1986)
10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3Fuzzy Sets Syst, 20
Ting-Yu Chen (2018)
Multiple criteria decision analysis under complex uncertainty: A Pearson‐like correlation‐based Pythagorean fuzzy compromise approachInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
Harish Garg, K. Kumar (2019)
Linguistic Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Group Decision Making ProblemsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27
K. Kumar, Harish Garg (2018)
TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environmentComputational and Applied Mathematics, 37
K. Atanassov (1999)
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets - Theory and Applications, 35
Bijan Davvaz (2001)
Fuzzy Hv-submodulesFuzzy Sets Syst., 117
Chao-Ming Hwang, Miin-Shen Yang, W. Hung (2018)
New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the Jaccard index with its application to clusteringInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33
Xindong Peng, Harish Garg (2019)
Multiparametric similarity measures on Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognitionApplied Intelligence, 49
Z. Ma, Zeshui Xu (2016)
Symmetric Pythagorean Fuzzy Weighted Geometric/Averaging Operators and Their Application in Multicriteria Decision‐Making ProblemsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31
Ru-xin Nie, Zhang-peng Tian, Jian-qiang Wang, Jun-hua Hu (2018)
Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and partitioned normalized weighted Bonferroni mean operatorInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
Robert Lin (2014)
NOTE ON FUZZY SETSYugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 24
Harish Garg (2017)
Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Using Einstein t‐Norm and t‐Conorm for Multicriteria Decision‐Making ProcessInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32
Hui Gao (2018)
Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher Prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision makingJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 35
H. Bustince, E. Tartas, M. Pagola, Javier Fernández, Zeshui Xu, B. Bedregal, J. Montero, H. Hagras, F. Herrera, B. Baets (2016)
A Historical Account of Types of Fuzzy Sets and Their RelationshipsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 24
Harish Garg (2016)
A New Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations and Its Application to Decision MakingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31
De-qing Li, Zeng Wen-yi, Yin Qian (2017)
Distance measures of pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in multiattribute decision making
Lei Wang, Harish Garg, N. Li (2020)
Pythagorean fuzzy interactive Hamacher power aggregation operators for assessment of express service quality with entropy weightSoft Computing, 25
Harish Garg (2019)
Neutrality operations-based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its applications to multiple attribute group decision-making processJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11
Ju-Ying Huang (2014)
Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision makingJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 27
R. Yager (2013)
Pythagorean fuzzy subsets2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS)
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
The paper aims are to impersonate some robust sine-trigonometric operations laws to determine the group decision-making process under the Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS) situation. The PFS has a notable feature to trade with the dubious information with a broader membership representation space than the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Based on it, the present paper is classified into three phases. The first phase is to introduce new operational laws for PFS. The main idea behind these proposed operations is to incorporate the qualities of the sine function, namely periodicity and symmetric about the origin towards the decisions of the objects. Secondly, based on these laws, numerous operators to aggregate the information are acquired along with their requisite properties and relations. Finally, an algorithm to interpret the multiattribute group decision making problem is outlined based on the stated operators and manifest it with an illustrative example. A detailed comparative interpretation is achieved with some of the existing methods to reveal their influences.
Artificial Intelligence Review – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 26, 2021
Keywords: Decision making process; Pythagorean fuzzy sets; Trigonometric operations laws; MAGDM
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.