Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2006)
Morcrette, 2006: A linearized approach to the radiative
A. Peuch, J. Thepaut, J. Pailleux (2000)
Dynamical impact of total‐ozone observations in a four‐dimensional variational assimilationQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 126
Damian Wilson, D. Gregory (2003)
The behaviour of large‐scale model cloud schemes under idealized forcing scenariosQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 129
J. Flemming, A. Inness, L. Jones, H. Eskes, V. Huijnen, M. Schultz, O. Stein, D. Cariolle, D. Kinnison, G. Brasseur (2010)
Forecasts and assimilation experiments of the Antarctic ozone hole 2008Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11
(2002)
Ozone data assimilation system: Preliminary system, United Kingdom Meteorological Office Forecasting
J. -N. Thepaut A. Peuch (2000)
Dynamical impact of total-ozone observations in a four-dimensional variational assimilationQuart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126
C. McLinden, S. Olsen, B. Hannegan, O. Wild, M. Prather, J. Sundet (2000)
Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models : A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause fluxJournal of Geophysical Research, 105
D. Cariolle, M. Déqué (1986)
Southern hemisphere medium-scale waves and total ozone disturbances in a spectral general circulation modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 91
CESM (2014)
CESM1.2 Release Series User’s Guide. [Available online at http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.2/cesm/doc/usersguide/ug.pdf.]
J. McCormack, S. Eckermann, L. Coy, D. Allen, Young‐joon Kim, T. Hogan, B. Lawrence, A. Stephens, E. Browell, J. Burris, T. Mcgee, C. Trepte (2004)
NOGAPS-ALPHA model simulations of stratospheric ozone during the SOLVE2 campaignAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 4
R. Harrison (2000)
Introduction to atmospheric chemistryScience of The Total Environment
D. Cariolle, J. Morcrette (2006)
A linearized approach to the radiative budget of the stratosphere: influence of the ozone distributionGeophysical Research Letters, 33
D. Blake, R. Llndzen (1973)
Effect of Photochemical Models on Calculated Equilibria and Cooling Rates in the StratosphereMonthly Weather Review, 101
M. Iacono, J. Delamere, E. Mlawer, M. Shephard, S. Clough, W. Collins (2008)
Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer modelsJournal of Geophysical Research, 113
F. Sassi, B. Boville, D. Kinnison, Rolando Garcia (2005)
The effects of interactive ozone chemistry on simulations of the middle atmosphereGeophysical Research Letters, 32
D. Jackson (2002)
Ozone data assimilation system: Preliminary system
Song‐You Hong, Y. Noh, J. Dudhia (2006)
A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment ProcessesMonthly Weather Review, 134
Song‐You Hong, J. Lim (2006)
The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6)Asia-pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 42
B. Monge-Sanz, M. Chipperfield, D. Cariolle, W. Feng (2010)
Results from a new linear O 3 scheme with embedded heterogeneous chemistry compared with the parent full-chemistry 3-D CTMAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11
A. Geer, W. Lahoz, S. Bekki, N. Bormann, Q. Errera, H. Eskes, D. Fonteyn, D. Jackson, M. Juckes, S. Massart, V. Peuch, S. Rharmili, A. Segers (2006)
The ASSET intercomparison of ozone analyses: method and first resultsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6
(1995)
A 4-Dimensional Ozone Climatology for UGAMP Models
R. Dragani, A. Mcnally (2013)
Operational assimilation of ozone‐sensitive infrared radiances at ECMWFQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 139
(2011)
EOS MLS Version 3.3 Level 2 data quality and description document, Tech. Rep.
(2014)
CESM 1 . 2 Release Series User ’ s Guide
R. Dragani (2011)
On the quality of the ERA‐Interim ozone reanalyses: comparisons with satellite dataQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137
V. John, S. Buehler (2004)
The impact of ozone lines on AMSU‐B radiancesGeophysical Research Letters, 31
WMO (2008)
Antarctic Ozone Bulletin, No 3/2008
D. Cariolle, A. Lasserre-Bigorry, J. Royer, J. Geleyn (1990)
A general circulation model simulation of the springtime Antarctic ozone decrease and its impact on mid-latitudesJournal of Geophysical Research, 95
P. Long (1986)
An economical and compatible scheme for parameterizing the stable surface layer in the medium range forecast model
J. Paul, F. Fortuin, H. Kelder (1998)
An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurementsJournal of Geophysical Research, 103
(2004)
Hólm, 2004: Ozone assimilation in the ERA-40
D. Dee, S. Uppala, A. Simmons, P. Berrisford, P. Poli, S. Kobayashi, U. Andrae, M. Balmaseda, G. Balsamo, P. Bauer, P. Bechtold, A. Beljaars, L. Berg, J. Bidlot, N. Bormann, C. Delsol, R. Dragani, M. Fuentes, A. Geer, L. Haimberger, S. Healy, H. Hersbach, E. Holm, L. Isaksen, P. Kållberg, M. Köhler, M. Matricardi, A. Mcnally, B. Monge-Sanz, J. Morcrette, B. Park, C. Peubey, P. Rosnay, Christina Tavolato, J. Thepaut, F. Vitart (2011)
The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation systemQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137
J. Derber, Wan Wu (1998)
The Use of TOVS Cloud-Cleared Radiances in the NCEP SSI Analysis SystemMonthly Weather Review, 126
D. Cariolle, H. Teyssèdre (2007)
A revised linear ozone photochemistry parameterization for use in transport and general circulation models: multi-annual simulationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7
J. McCormack, S. Eckermann, D. Siskind, T. Mcgee (2006)
CHEM 2 DOPP : A new linearized gas-phase ozone photochemistry parameterization for high-altitude NWP and climate models
A. Dethof, E. Holm (2004)
Ozone assimilation in the ERA‐40 reanalysis projectQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 130
Jongil Han, H. Pan (2011)
Revision of Convection and Vertical Diffusion Schemes in the NCEP Global Forecast SystemWeather and Forecasting, 26
M. Ek, K. Mitchell, Ying Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grunmann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, J. Tarpley (2003)
Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 108
R. Lindzen, R. Goody (1965)
Radiative and Photochemical Processes in Mesospheric Dynamics: Part I, Models for Radiative and Photochemical ProcessesJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 22
J. Hsu, M. Prather (2009)
Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozoneJournal of Geophysical Research, 114
N. McFarlane (1987)
The Effect of Orographically Excited Gravity Wave Drag on the General Circulation of the Lower Stratosphere and TroposphereJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 44
G. Labow, J. Ziemke, R. Mcpeters, D. Haffner, P. Bhartia (2015)
A total ozone‐dependent ozone profile climatology based on ozonesondes and Aura MLS dataJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120
A. Geer, W. Lahoz, D. Jackson, D. Cariolle, J. McCormack (2006)
Evaluation of linear ozone photochemistry parametrizations in a stratosphere-troposphere data assimilation systemAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7
D. Cariolle, D. Brard (1984)
The Distribution of Ozone and Active Stratospheric Species: Results of a Two-Dimensional Atmospheric Model
R. Stolarski, A. Douglass (1985)
Parameterization of the photochemistry of stratospheric ozone including catalytic loss processesJournal of Geophysical Research, 90
J. Morcrette (2003)
Ozone-radiation interactions in the ECMWF forecast system
M. Ek, K. Mitchell, Yi-Bing Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grunmann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, D. Tarpley (2003)
Implementation of Noah land-surface model advances in the NCEP operational mesoscale Eta model
Abstract The two types of ozone, the simulation with interactive (prognostic) ozone using linear photochemistry parameterization (LPP) (INTR) and the simulation with non-interactive ozone using ozone climatology (CLIM), were used in the global forecast model. These two types of ozone were compared with ozone observations from the Aura Microwave Lim Sounder (MLS) and ozonesondes from 16-30 September 2008. The INTR is sensitive to LPP schemes while less sensitive to the time average of initial ozone data. Among three LPP schemes, CARIOLLE, COPCAT, and LINOZ, the COPCAT produces ozone profiles with least differences from MLS and ozonesondes. CLIM overestimates MLS at 200-20 hPa while INTR with COPCAT scheme underestimates MLS ozone above 5 hPa. Over the Antarctic in the lower stratosphere CLIM overestimates MLS and ozonesondes whereas INTR underestimates MLS but overestimates the ozonesonde data. Thus, COPCAT agrees better with ozonesonde data than any other LPP schemes and CLIM. Changing the ozone distribution from CLIM to INTR affects temperature profiles mainly through the modification of differential radiative fluxes. The correlations between ozone, differential radiative fluxes, and temperature are distinguished by altitude (or pressure levels). The correlations are strong or moderate between 3-1000 hPa (lower atmosphere) and weak above 3 hPa (upper atmosphere). This study demonstrates that the simulation of ozone using an appropriate LPP scheme is excellent in overcoming the drawbacks of using climatological ozone profiles that poorly agree with observations in extreme ozone hole events.
"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences" – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.