Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Simplified Mesofluidic Systems for the Formation of Micron to Millimeter Droplets and the Synthesis of Materials

Simplified Mesofluidic Systems for the Formation of Micron to Millimeter Droplets and the... Abstract We present and validate simple mesofluidic devices for producing monodisperse droplets and materials. The significance of this work is a demonstration that simple and complex droplet formulations can be prepared uniformly using off-the-shelf small-diameter tubing, barbed tubing adapters, and needles. With these simple tools, multiple droplet-forming devices and a new particle concentrator were produced and validated. We demonstrate that the droplet-forming devices could produce low-dispersity particles from 25 to 1200 μm and that these results are similar to results from more complicated devices. Through a study of the fluid dynamics and a dimensional analysis of the data, we have correlated droplet size with two dimensionless groups, capillary number and viscosity ratio. The flow-focusing device is more sensitive to both parameters than the T-junction geometry. The modular character of our mesofluidic devices allowed us to rapidly assemble compound devices that use flow-focusing and T-junction devices in series to create complex droplet-in-microcapsule materials. This work demonstrates that flow chemistry does not require complicated tools, and an inexpensive tool-kit can allow anyone with interest to enter the field. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Flow Chemistry Springer Journals

Simplified Mesofluidic Systems for the Formation of Micron to Millimeter Droplets and the Synthesis of Materials

Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/simplified-mesofluidic-systems-for-the-formation-of-micron-to-c8TDzHV1Ok
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
2012 Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN
2062-249X
eISSN
2063-0212
DOI
10.1556/jfc-d-11-00023
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract We present and validate simple mesofluidic devices for producing monodisperse droplets and materials. The significance of this work is a demonstration that simple and complex droplet formulations can be prepared uniformly using off-the-shelf small-diameter tubing, barbed tubing adapters, and needles. With these simple tools, multiple droplet-forming devices and a new particle concentrator were produced and validated. We demonstrate that the droplet-forming devices could produce low-dispersity particles from 25 to 1200 μm and that these results are similar to results from more complicated devices. Through a study of the fluid dynamics and a dimensional analysis of the data, we have correlated droplet size with two dimensionless groups, capillary number and viscosity ratio. The flow-focusing device is more sensitive to both parameters than the T-junction geometry. The modular character of our mesofluidic devices allowed us to rapidly assemble compound devices that use flow-focusing and T-junction devices in series to create complex droplet-in-microcapsule materials. This work demonstrates that flow chemistry does not require complicated tools, and an inexpensive tool-kit can allow anyone with interest to enter the field.

Journal

Journal of Flow Chemistry – Springer Journals

Published: Apr 1, 2012

Keywords: chemistry/food science, general; green chemistry; organic chemistry; inorganic chemistry; nanochemistry; industrial chemistry/chemical engineering

References

  • Microreactors
    H Lowe
  • Song, H.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 768–772
    Song, H.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
  • Zheng, B.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Anal. Chem. 76, 4977–4982.
    Zheng, B.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Anal. Chem.
  • Gañán-Calvo, A. M.; Gordillo, J. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87.
    Gañán-Calvo, A. M.; Gordillo, J. M. Phys. Rev. Lett.
  • Lorenceau, E.; Sang, Y. Y. C.; Höhler, R.; Cohen-Addad, S. Phys. Fluids 2006, 18
    Lorenceau, E.; Sang, Y. Y. C.; Höhler, R.; Cohen-Addad, S. Phys. Fluids
  • Quevedo, E.; Steinbacher, J.; McQuade, D. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10498–10499.
    Quevedo, E.; Steinbacher, J.; McQuade, D. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
  • 584 μm inner diameter/902 μm outer diameter to 1,194 μm inner diameter/1,651 μm outer diameter.
  • For the dimensional analysis, we make several assumptions. First, owing to the small size of the microfluidic device, the Reynolds numbers of the flows were small, so inertial effects can be ignored. Also, we assume that the density differences between the fluids are sufficiently small that buoyancy is unimportant. The surfactant used in some of the continuous phase fluids affected the measured interfacial tension of the system, but we assumed it played no other role in drop formation.
  • Garstecki, P.; Stone, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94.
    Garstecki, P.; Stone, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Phys. Rev. Lett.
  • Ca was calculated using the physical parameters listed in Table 1 and vc calculated from volumetric flow rates. For the TJD, we used the average velocity, in the PVC tube for vc. For the FFD, we used the average velocity at the outlet adapter for vc, which is appropriate because we placed the tip of the disperse phase needle as close as possible to the tip of the outlet adapter. Owing to geometric arguments and mass conservation, the fluid velocity at the outlet adapter, where the droplets formed, was seven times the velocity in the PVC outlet tube.
    Ca was calculated using the physical parameters listed in Table
  • Garstecki et al. (ref. 21) found that λ has no effect on droplet size in a microfluidic T-junction operating in a squeezing regime. However, the range of Ca examined was lower than the range in our systems (i.e. 10−4–10−2 vs. 10−3–101 in this study), and the device geometries differed significantly between the two experiments. Cramer et al. (ref. 32a) also reported little effect of viscosity ratio on droplet diameter in a coaxial flow cell, but their smallest λ corresponds to the highest λ used in our work, and the disperse phase flow rates were at least 2.5 times greater.
    Garstecki
  • Microfluidic Stickers
    D Bartolo, G Degre, P Nghe, V Studer
  • Ambravaneswaran, B.; Subramani, H. J.; Phillips, S. D.; Basaran, O. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93
    Ambravaneswaran, B.; Subramani, H. J.; Phillips, S. D.; Basaran, O. A. Phys. Rev. Lett.