Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Powles (1984)
Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis Induced by Visible LightAnnual Review of Plant Biology, 35
J. Azcón-Bieto, G. Farquhar, A. Caballero (1981)
Effects of temperature, oxygen concentration, leaf age and seasonal variations on the CO2 compensation point of Lolium perenne L.Planta, 152
R. Pearcy, V. Franceschi (2004)
Photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure of C3 and C4 tree species grown in high- and low-light environmentsPhotosynthesis Research, 9
(1983)
Forest grazing in the southern United States. In: Hannaway DB (eds) Foothills for Food and Forests, pp 247–260
J. Martsolf (1966)
Microclimatic Modification Through Shade Induced Changes in Net Radiation.
V. Watson, C. Hagedorn, W. Knight, H. Pearson (1984)
Shade tolerance of grass and legume germplasm for use in the southern forest range.Journal of Range Management, 37
G. Gist, G. Mott (1957)
Some Effects of Light Intensity, Temperature, and Soil Moisture on the Growth of Alfalfa, Red Clover and Birdsfoot Trefoil Seedlings1Agronomy Journal, 49
K. Al‐Khatib, G. Paulsen (1989)
Enhancement of thermal injury to photosynthesis in wheat plants and thylakoids by high light intensity.Plant physiology, 90 3
G. Edwards, David Walker (1983)
C3, C4: Mechanisms and Cellular and Environmental Regulation of Photosynthesis
(1958)
Solar energy : a summary of records at Columbia, Missouri
N. Boardman (1977)
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants.Annual Review of Plant Biology, 28
K. Kephart, Dwayne Buxton, S. Taylor (1992)
Growth of C3 and C4 perennial grasses under reduced irradianceCrop Science, 32
O. Björkman, P. Holmgren (1963)
Adaptability of the Photosynthetic Apparatus to Light Intensity in Ecotypes from Exposed and Shaded HabitatsPhysiologia Plantarum, 16
R. Brown, D. Radcliffe (1986)
A Comparison of Apparent Photosynthesis in Sericea Lespedeza and Alfalfa 1Crop Science, 26
M. Smith, P. Whiteman (1983)
Evaluation of Tropical Grasses in Increasing Shade under Coconut CanopiesExperimental Agriculture, 19
(1987)
The biochemical basis for photoinhibition of photosystem II
(1980)
The effects of pole-size black walnut trees on six forage species
B. Baker, G. Jung (1968)
Effect of Environmental Conditions on the Growth of Four Perennial Grasses. I. Response to Controlled Temperature1Agronomy Journal, 60
P. Blenkinsop, J. Dale (1974)
The Effects of Shade Treatment and Light Intensity on Rihulose-1,5-Diphosphate Carboxylase Activity and Fraction I Protein Level in the First Leaf of BarleyJournal of Experimental Botany, 25
Gw Anderson, F. Batini (1979)
Clover and crop production under 13- to 15-year-old Pinus radiataAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 19
Thirty forages, including eight introduced cool-season grasses, four native warm-season grasses, one introduced warm-season grass, eight introduced cool-season legumes, five native warm-season legumes, and four introduced warm-season legumes, were grown in 7.6 L (two gallon) pots in full sun, 50%, and 80% shade created by shade cloth over a greenhouse frame. Experiments were conducted during summer--fall 1994, spring--early summer 1995, and summer--fall 1995. A complete randomized experimental design was used and above ground dry weight was measured in each shade environment. Tukey's studentized range test was used to compare mean dry weights (MDW) within a species. Warm-season grasses displayed significant reductions in MDW under shade regardless of growing season. All cool-season forages grown during spring--early summer showed a decrease in MDW under shade; however, the reductions in dry weights of ‘Benchmark’ and ‘Justus’ orchardgrass, ‘KY 31’ tall fescue, Desmodium canescens and D. paniculatum were not significant under 50% shade. Cool-season grasses showed more shade tolerance when grown during the summer--fall than when grown during the spring--early summer. Seven of the selected cool-season grasses grown during the summer--fall did not display significant reductions in MDW under 50% shade as compared to full sun. Smooth bromegrass grown under 50% shade showed a significantly increased MDW production compared to growth in full sun. With the exception of Justus orchardgrass and smooth bromegrass, growth of cool-season grasses was inhibited at 80% shade. Among the legumes harvested during the fall, the dry weights of both Desmodium species tested and hog peanut (Amphicarpaea bracteata L.) increased significantly under 50% and 80% shade. In addition, ‘Cody’ alfalfa, white clover, slender lespedeza and ‘Kobe’ lespedeza showed no significant reductions in MDW under 50% shade.
Agroforestry Systems – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.