Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Aronsson (1965)
Minimization problems for the functional supxF(x, f(x), f′(x))Arkiv för Matematik, 6
A. Garroni, V. Nesi, M. Ponsiglione (2001)
Dielectric breakdown: optimal boundsRoy. Soc. Lond. Proc. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 457
G. Buttazzo, G. Maso (1985)
Integral representation and relaxation of local functionalsNonlinear Analysis-theory Methods & Applications, 9
(2001)
Non Linéaire
O. Alvarez, E. Barron, H. Ishii (1999)
Hopf-Lax Formulas for Semicontinuous DataIndiana University Mathematics Journal, 48
(2006)
Prinari : From 1homogeneous supremal functionals to difference quotients : relaxation and Γconvergence
Jeff Calder (2019)
The Calculus of variationsPrinciples of Optics
T. Champion, L. Pascale, F. Prinari (2004)
Gamma-convergence and Absolute Minimizers for Supremal FunctionalsESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 10
Principles of comparison with distance functions for AML
(1997)
Calculus of Variation in L ∞
The relaxation problem for supremal functionals
P. Cardaliaguet, F. Prinari (2005)
Supremal Representation of L∞ FunctionalsApplied Mathematics and Optimization, 52
Gianni Maso (2007)
Ennio De GiorgiBollettino Della Unione Matematica Italiana
(1999)
Marcellini : Implicit Partial Differential Equations
E.N. Barron, R.R. Jensen, C.Y. Wang (2001)
Lower semicontinuity of L ∞ functionalsAnn. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 18
A. Garroni, M. Ponsiglione, F. Prinari (2006)
From 1-homogeneous supremal functionals to difference quotients: relaxation and Γ-convergenceCalculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 27
G. Aronsson (1967)
Extension of functions satisfying lipschitz conditionsArkiv för Matematik, 6
Principles of comparison with distance functions for AML . To appear on Journal of Convex Analysis
(2004)
Semicontinuity and absolute minimizers for supremal functionals
A. Briani, A. Garroni, F. Prinari (2004)
HOMOGENIZATION OF L∞ FUNCTIONALSMathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 14
(2004)
Prinari : Homogenization of L ∞ functionals
A. Garroni, Vincenzo Nesi, M. Ponsiglione (2001)
Dielectric breakdown: optimal boundsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 457
G. Cecco, G. Palmieri (1993)
Distanza intrinseca su una varietá finsleriana di LipschitzRend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL, XVIII Mem. Mat. V, 1
(2001)
Wang : Lower Semicontinuity of L ∞ Functionals
B. Dacorogna, Paolo Marcellini (1999)
Implicit partial differential equations
(2005)
Prinari: Supremal representation of L ∞ functionals
M. Crandall, L. Evans, Ronald Gariepy (2001)
Optimal Lipschitz extensions and the infinity laplacianCalculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 13
E. Barron, R. Jensen, Changyou Wang (2001)
The Euler Equation and¶Absolute Minimizers of L∞ FunctionalsArchive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 157
E. Acerbi, G. Buttazzo, F. Prinari (2002)
The Class of Functionals which can be Represented by a Supremum
(1993)
Palmieri : Distanza intrinseca su una varietá finsleriana di Lipschitz
(1966)
Minimization Problems for the Functional sup x F (x, f (x), f (x)). II, Ark
(2001)
Ponsiglione : Dielectric breakdown : optimal bounds
T. Champion, L. Pascale (2007)
Principles of comparison with distance functions for absolute minimizersJournal of Convex Analysis, 14
BY McSHANE, E. McShane (1934)
Extension of range of functionsBulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 40
F. Prinari (2006)
Relaxation and gramma-convergence of supremal functionalsBollettino Della Unione Matematica Italiana, 9
Gunnar, Aronsson (1966)
Minimization problems for the functional supxF(x, f(x), f'(x)). (II)Arkiv för Matematik, 6
E. Barron, R. Jensen, Changyou Wang (2001)
Lower semicontinuity of L∞ functionalsAnnales De L Institut Henri Poincare-analyse Non Lineaire, 18
(2004)
Prinari : Semicontinuity and absolute minimizers for supremal functionals
We study the weak* lower semicontinuity properties of functionals of the form $$F(u)=\mathop{\mathrm{ess\,sup}}_{x\in\Omega}f(x,Du(x))$$ where Ω is a bounded open set of R N and u ∈ W 1,∞ (Ω). Without a continuity assumption on f (⋅, ξ ) we show that the supremal functional F is weakly * lower semicontinuous if and only if it is a level convex functional (i.e. it has convex sub-levels). In particular if F is weakly * lower semicontinuous, then it can be represented through a level convex function. Finally a counterexample shows that in general it is not possible to represent F through the level convex envelope of f .
Applied Mathematics and Optimization – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.