Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Durante (2007)
Ontological Commitment
(1952)
Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen
K. Fintel (2001)
Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions)
Charles Caton (1959)
STRAWSON ON REFERRINGMind
Pavel Tichý (1980)
THE SEMANTICS OF EPISODIC VERBS, 7
M. Reimer, A. Bezuidenhout (2004)
Descriptions and Beyond
P. Strawson (1954)
Introduction To Logical Theory
V. Sloan (1966)
What do we talk about?The Journal of the American Dental Hygienists' Association, 40 3
B. Fraassen (1968)
Presupposition, Implication, and Self-ReferenceThe Journal of Philosophy, 65
P. Tichý (1975)
What Do We Talk About?Philosophy of Science, 42
Pavel Tichý (1978)
De Dicto and de RePhilosophia, 8
M. Duží, Bjørn Jespersen, P. Materna (2010)
Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic - Foundations and Applications of Transparent Intensional Logic, 17
Pavel Tichý (1988)
The Foundations of Frege's Logic
(1975)
What Do We Talk About? Philosophy of Science 42(1), 80–93.13 13Tichý’s published papers are reprinted in Tichý
Pavel Tichý (1986)
Indiscernibility of identicalsStudia Logica, 45
Chu R, Xiao N, Humphrey M, Wasson G, J. K., Wang, Shen R, Zhu H (1950)
On referring
J. Raclavský (2009)
Names and Descriptions: Logico-Semantical Investigations
(2009)
Names and Descriptions: Logico-Semantical Investigations (in Czech). Olomouc, Nakladatelstv́ı Olomouc
(2010)
Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic
B. Russell (1957)
MR. STRAWSON ON REFERRINGMind
(2009)
Names and Descriptions : LogicoSemantical Investigations ( in Czech )
P. Strawson (1950)
III.—ON REFERRINGMind
V. Svoboda (2004)
Pavel Tichý's collected papers in logic and philosophy
W. Quine (1943)
Notes on Existence and NecessityThe Journal of Philosophy, 40
Strawson’s work seems to contain both pragmatic and semantic concepts of presupposition. The former concept has largely been studied by many philosophers and linguists, while the latter has not been properly investigated (van Fraassen being an exception). The present author explicates the semantic concept of existential presupposition in relation to deriving existential statements and distinguishing their de dicto/de re variants (in the rather generalized sense following Tichý).
Human Affairs – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 22, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.