Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Abolghasem Saneinejad, B. Hobbs (1995)
Inelastic Design of Infilled FramesJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 121
D. Soni, B. Mistry (2006)
Qualitative review of seismic response of vertically irregular building frames, 43
J. Humar, E. Wright (1977)
Earthquake response of steel‐framed multistorey buildings with set‐backsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 5
(2006)
Evaluation of Strengthening Options for Masonry Infilled RC Frames with Open First Storey
(2010)
A note on preliminary estimate of member dimensions of a short multi-storey building based on serviceability criterion
(1994)
Seismic resistance of infilled frames, in Proceedings Suppl (IV), Paper 7360S
(2009)
Earthquake resistant design of open ground storey RC framed buildings
(2002)
Part 1) Criteria for earthquake resistant design for structure
A. Madan, A. Reinhorn, J. Mander, R. Valles (1995)
Modeling of Masonry Infill Panels for Structural AnalysisJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 123
(1934)
Distribution of wind loads to the bents of a building
R. Kanitkar, V. Kanitkar (2004)
Seismic performance of conventional multi-storey buildings with open ground floors for vehicular parkingThe Indian Concrete Journal, 78
(1996)
IDARC Version 4.0—A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Buildings
J. Decker (2016)
Design Of Concrete Structures
A. Hashmi, M. Alok (2008)
DAMAGE FORECAST FOR MASONRY INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO EARTHQUAKES IN INDIACurrent Science, 94
V. Bertero, S. Brokken (1983)
Infills in Seismic Resistant BuildingJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 109
(1996)
Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of concrete buildings
NSPECTRA 3.0: Nonlinear Analysis Program for Elastic and Inelastic Spectra with degradation and Deterioration of Structural System
Y. Park, A. Reinhorn, S. Kunnath (1987)
IDARC: Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame - Shear-Wall Structures
Current seismic code presents certain stringent factors for defining frame as regular and irregular. Thereby these stringent factors only decide the type of analysis (i.e. equivalent static analysis or dynamic analysis) to be done. On the contrary, development of new simplified methods such as pushover analysis can give lateral load capacity of any structure (e.g. regular or irregular frame etc.) easily. Design by iterative procedure with the help of pushover analysis for serviceability requirement (i.e. inter storey drift limitation) provided by present seismic code, can provide an alternative to present practicing procedure. Present paper deals with regular setback frame in combination with vulnerable layout of masonry infill walls over the frame elevation (i.e. probable case of “Vertical Stiffness Irregularities”). Nonlinear time history analysis and Capacity Spectrum Method have been implemented to investigate the seismic performance of these frames. Finally, recently developed preliminary design procedure satisfying the serviceability criterion of inter storey drift limitation has been employed for the preliminary design of these frames.
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 26, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.