Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
GE Keles, KR Lamborn, MS Berger (2003)
Coregistration accuracy and detection of brain shift using intraoperative sononavigation during resection of hemispheric tumorsNeurosurgery, 53
J. Nitsch, J. Klein, P. Dammann, K. Wrede, O. Gembruch, J. Moltz, H. Meine, U. Sure, R. Kikinis, D. Miller (2019)
Automatic and efficient MRI-US segmentations for improving intraoperative image fusion in image-guided neurosurgeryNeuroImage : Clinical, 22
IJ Gerard, M Kersten-Oertel, S Drouin, JA Hall, K Petrecca, D De Nigris (2018)
Combining intraoperative ultrasound brain shift correction and augmented reality visualizations: a pilot study of eight casesJ Med Imag., 5
T. Selbekk, A. Jakola, O. Solheim, T. Johansen, F. Lindseth, I. Reinertsen, G. Unsgård (2013)
Ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery: approaches to minimize surgically induced image artefacts for improved resection controlActa Neurochirurgica, 155
H. Rivaz, D. Collins (2015)
Near real-time robust non-rigid registration of volumetric ultrasound images for neurosurgery.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 41 2
H. Chel, P. Bora, K. Ramchiary (2020)
A fast technique for hyper-echoic region separation from brain ultrasound images using patch based thresholding and cubic B-spline based contour smoothing.Ultrasonics, 111
H. Rivaz, D. Collins (2015)
Deformable registration of preoperative MR, pre-resection ultrasound, and post-resection ultrasound images of neurosurgeryInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10
M. Pino, A. Imperato, Irene Musca, R. Maugeri, G. Giammalva, Gabriele Costantino, F. Graziano, F. Meli, N. Francaviglia, D. Iacopino, A. Villa (2018)
New Hope in Brain Glioma Surgery: The Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound. A ReviewBrain Sciences, 8
U. Ijaz, R. Prager, A. Gee, Graham Treece (2010)
Optimization strategies for ultrasound volume registrationMeasurement Science and Technology, 21
Laurence Mercier, David Araujo, C. Haegelen, R. Maestro, K. Petrecca, D. Collins (2013)
Registering pre- and postresection 3-dimensional ultrasound for improved visualization of residual brain tumor.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 39 1
R. González, R. Woods, B. Masters (2009)
Digital Image Processing, Third EditionJournal of Biomedical Optics, 14
E. Campana, G. Fasano, Antonio Pinto (2010)
Dynamic analysis for the selection of parameters and initial population, in particle swarm optimizationJournal of Global Optimization, 48
JA Noble (2010)
Ultrasound image segmentation and tissue characterizationProc Inst Mech Eng [H], 224
W. Chandler, J. Knake, J. Mcgillicuddy, K. Lillehei, T. Silver (1982)
Intraoperative use of real-time ultrasonography in neurosurgery.Journal of neurosurgery, 57 2
Inês Machado, M. Toews, Jie Luo, Prashin Unadkat, W. Essayed, E. George, P. Teodoro, Herculano Carvalho, J. Martins, P. Golland, S. Pieper, Sarah Frisken, A. Golby, W. Wells (2018)
Non-rigid registration of 3D ultrasound for neurosurgery using automatic feature detection and matchingInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 13
A Nabavi, P McL Black, DT Gering, CF Westin, V Mehta, RS Pergolizzi (2001)
Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shiftNeurosurgery, 48
M. Schwier, T. Chitiboi, T. Hülnhagen, H. Hahn (2013)
Automated spine and vertebrae detection in CT images using object‐based image analysisInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 29
Chang-Yan Xiao, Su Zhang, Yazhu Chen (2004)
A diffusion stick method for speckle suppression in ultrasonic imagesPattern Recognit. Lett., 25
P. Vianna, R. Farias, W. Pereira (2021)
U-Net and SegNet performances on lesion segmentation of breast ultrasonography imagesResearch on Biomedical Engineering, 37
G. Unsgaard, S. Ommedal, Tomm Muller, A. Gronningsaeter, T. Hernes (2002)
Neuronavigation by Intraoperative Three-dimensional Ultrasound: Initial Experience during Brain Tumor ResectionNeurosurgery, 50
J. Trobaugh, W. Richard, Kurt Smith, R. Bucholz (1994)
Frameless stereotactic ultrasonography: method and applications.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 18 4
Laurence Mercier, R. Maestro, K. Petrecca, David Araujo, C. Haegelen, D. Collins (2012)
Online database of clinical MR and ultrasound images of brain tumors.Medical physics, 39 6
GJ Dohrmann, JM Rubin (2001)
History of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgeryNeurosurg Clin N Am, 12
J. Nelder, R. Mead (1965)
A Simplex Method for Function MinimizationComput. J., 7
Luca Canalini, J. Klein, Dorothea Miller, R. Kikinis (2019)
Segmentation-based registration of ultrasound volumes for glioma resection in image-guided neurosurgeryInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 14
Yiming Xiao, M. Fortin, G. Unsgård, H. Rivaz, I. Reinertsen (2017)
REtroSpective Evaluation of Cerebral Tumors (RESECT): A clinical database of pre-operative MRI and intra-operative ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgeries.Medical physics, 44 7
Laurence Mercier, R. Maestro, K. Petrecca, Anna Kochanowska, Simon Drouin, Charles Yan, A. Janke, S. Chen, D. Collins (2011)
New prototype neuronavigation system based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative freehand ultrasound: system description and validationInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 6
R. Sivanandan, J. Jayakumari (2021)
Ultrasound liver tumour active contour segmentation with initialization using adaptive Otsu based thresholdingResearch on Biomedical Engineering, 37
PurposeBrain ultrasound (BUS) is a plausible solution for both pre-operative and intra-operative brain imaging during neurosurgery. The registration between pre-operative and intra-operative images resolves the adverse effect of the brain shift. But this registration is challenging due to various artefacts present in the intra-operative BUS images. This paper presents a segmentation-based approach for the registration of pre- and intra-operative brain ultrasound images that reduces the effect of artefacts present in both the images.MethodsThe similarity between pre-operative brain ultrasound image (pBUS) and intra-operative brain ultrasound(iBUS) images is poor because of the speckle and present artefacts. It makes registration challenging. It was observed that the hyper-echoic (HE) regions in pBUS and iBUS images get less affected by the artefacts, and these regions have considerable similarity. We apply a patch-based segmentation approach to both the pBUS and the iBUS images to separate those HE regions. Rigid registration is performed between the segmented HE regions. The logarithm of the mean squared error(MSE) captures the similarity between registering image pairs. Different heuristic optimization algorithms such as biogeography-based algorithm (BBO), simulated annealing (SA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) were applied to minimize the logarithm of MSE. Comparing the results, we found that PSO outperforms all other algorithms in order to find the registration parameters.ResultsExperiments were conducted on the images from the BITE and the RESECT datasets. Results of the proposed method were compared with two other existing methods. Common tag-points were marked with the help of an expert radiologist for evaluation of the performance of the registration. The mean target registration error (mTRE) and structural similarity index (SSIM) were measured before and after the registration for the comparable methods. The average mTRE was computed on 43 pairs of images. The mTRE before registration was 5.87 mm that reduced to 4.8 mm by the method of Chel and Bora (2017), whereas the proposed method reduced it to 2.91 mm. The feature-based method (Machado et al. 2018) failed because of improper feature matching between the registering image pairs.ConclusionUnlike other methods, the proposed method considers the effects of artefacts present in the registering pBUS and iBUS image pairs. The proposed method adopts a patch-based segmentation approach which is robust to noise and extracts similar HE regions from the registering image pairs. Registration is performed between the segmented HE regions from the pBUS and iBUS images. Performance of the proposed method was compared with another PSO-based method (Chel and Bora 2017) and a feature-based method (Machado et al. 2018). The proposed method outperformed the other two methods in reducing the mTRE and SSIM between the registering images.
Research on Biomedical Engineering – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 19, 2023
Keywords: Medical image registration; Brain ultrasound image registration; Segmentation-based image registration; Image-guided brain-surgery; Particle swarm optimization
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.