Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1969)
Parties rationnells du group libre
M. Harrison-Trainor, M. Ho (2017)
On optimal Scott sentences of finitely generated algebraic structures, 146
D. Scott (2014)
LOGIC WITH DENUMERABLY LONG FORMULAS AND FINITE STRINGS OF QUANTIFIERS
W. Calvert (2004)
The isomorphism problem for computable Abelian p-groups of bounded lengthJournal of Symbolic Logic, 70
R. Shore, Walker White (2000)
Characterizations for computable structures
W. Calvert, V. Harizanov, J. Knight, S. Miller (2006)
Index sets of computable structuresAlgebra and Logic, 45
Ilya Kapovich, P. Schupp (2002)
Genericity, the Arzhantseva-Ol’shanskii method and the isomorphism problem for one-relator groupsMathematische Annalen, 331
J. Knight, Charles McCoy (2014)
Index sets and Scott sentencesArchive for Mathematical Logic, 53
M Ho (2017)
Describing groupsProc. Am. Math. Soc, 145
H. Keisler (1971)
Model theory for infinitary logic
Walker White (2003)
On the complexity of categoricity in computable structuresMathematical Logic Quarterly, 49
E. Gurari (1989)
Introduction to the theory of computation
S. Goncharov, V. Harizanov, J. Knight, R. Shore (2004)
1 1 relations and paths through OJournal of Symbolic Logic
Series of six papers appearing
C. Ash, J. Knight (2000)
Computable structures and the hyperarithmetical hierarchy
(2016)
Computability Theory and Applications: The Art of Classical Computability
C McCoy, J Wallbaum (2012)
Describing free groups, Part II: $$\varPi ^0_4$$ Π 4 0 hardness and no $$\varSigma ^0_2$$ Σ 2 0 basisTrans. of the Amer. Math. Soc., 364
J. Knight (2012)
Describing free groupsTransactions of the American Mathematical Society, 364
Wanda Szmielew (1955)
Elementary properties of Abelian groupsFundamenta Mathematicae, 41
S. Lempp, T. Slaman (2006)
THE COMPLEXITY OF THE INDEX SETS OF א 0-CATEGORICAL THEORIES AND OF EHRENFEUCHT THEORIES
Barbara Csima, A. Montalbán, R. Shore (2006)
Boolean Algebras, Tarski Invariants, and Index SetsNotre Dame J. Formal Log., 47
M. Rabin (1960)
Computable algebra, general theory and theory of computable fields.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 95
R. Beaumont, H. Zuckerman (1951)
A characterization of the subgroups of the additive rationals.Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 1
SS Goncharov, JF Knight, V Harizanov, RA Shore (2004)
$$\varPi ^1_1$$ Π 1 1 relations and paths through $$\cal{O}$$ OJ. Symb. Log., 69
W. Calvert, D. Cummins, J. Knight, S. Miller (2004)
Comparing Classes of Finite StructuresAlgebra and Logic, 43
S Lempp, TA Slaman (2007)
The complexity of the index sets of the $$\aleph _0$$ ℵ 0 -categorical theories and of Ehrenfeucht theoriesAdv. Log. Contemp. Math., 425
O. Kharlampovich, A. Myasnikov (2006)
Elementary theory of free non-abelian groupsJournal of Algebra, 302
W. Calvert (2002)
The isomorphism problem for classes of computable fieldsArchive for Mathematical Logic, 43
S. Goncharov, J. Knight (2002)
Computable Structure and Non-Structure TheoremsAlgebra and Logic, 41
D Scott (1965)
The Theory of Models
V. Dobritsa (1983)
Complexity of the index set of a constructive modelAlgebra and Logic, 22
A. Nies (2007)
Describing GroupsBulletin of Symbolic Logic, 13
A. Raz (2014)
Index Sets of some Computable Groups
Charles Miller (2002)
Combinatorial Group Theory
We give Scott sentences for certain computable groups, and we use index set calculations as a way of checking that our Scott sentences are as simple as possible. We consider finitely generated groups and torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank. For both kinds of groups, the computable ones all have computable $$\varSigma _3$$ Σ 3 Scott sentences. Sometimes we can do better. In fact, the computable finitely generated groups that we have studied all have Scott sentences that are “computable d- $$\varSigma _2$$ Σ 2 ” (the conjunction of a computable $$\varSigma _2$$ Σ 2 sentence and a computable $$\varPi _2$$ Π 2 sentence). In [9], this was shown for the finitely generated free groups. Here we show it for all finitely generated abelian groups, and for the infinite dihedral group. Among the computable torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank, we focus on those of rank 1. These are exactly the additive subgroups of $$\mathbb {Q}$$ Q . We show that for some of these groups, the computable $$\varSigma _3$$ Σ 3 Scott sentence is best possible, while for others, there is a computable d- $$\varSigma _2$$ Σ 2 Scott sentence.
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 19, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.