Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Ballotta, Giuseppe Gau, C. Baracchini, R. Manara (2002)
Carotid Eversion Endarterectomy: Perioperative Outcome and Restenosis IncidenceAnnals of Vascular Surgery, 16
J. Avramovic, J. Fletcher (1992)
The incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy and its relationship to neurological events.The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, 33 1
A. Buchan (1991)
*North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis.The New England Journal of Medicine
Roddy (2002)
Choice of material for internal carotid artery bypass grafting: vein or prosthetic? Analysis of 44 proceduresJ Cardiovasc Surg, 10
Lazar Davidovic, I. Tomic, D. Marković, Siniša Pavlovic, M. Dragaš, I. Banzić (2015)
Carotid Endarterectomy : Eversion Technique
Stoney Rj, S. St (1976)
Recurrent carotid stenosis.Surgery, 80
J. Ricotta, M. O'Brien‐Irr (1997)
Conservative management of residual and recurrent lesions after carotid endarterectomy: long-term results.Journal of vascular surgery, 26 6
C. Irvine, R. Baird, P. Lamont, A. Davies (1995)
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosisBMJ, 311
T. O'Donnell, Agustin Rodriguez, John Fortunato, Harold Welch, W. Mackey (1996)
Management of recurrent carotid stenosis: should asymptomatic lesions be treated surgically?Journal of vascular surgery, 24 2
D Healy, R. Zierler, S. Nicholls, A Clowes, J. Primozich, R. Bergelin, D. Strandness (1989)
Long-term follow-up and clinical outcome of carotid restenosis.Journal of vascular surgery, 10 6
S. Roddy, R. Darling, K. Ozsvath, M. Mehta, B. Chang, P. Paty, P. Kreienberg, D. Shah (2002)
Choice of Material for Internal Carotid Artery Bypass Grafting: Vein or Prosthetic? Analysis of 44 ProceduresVascular, 10
P. Gagne, T. Riles, G. Jacobowitz, P. Lamparello, G. Giangola, M. Adelman, A. Imparato, R. Mintzer (1993)
Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease.Journal of vascular surgery, 18 6
W. Washburn, W. Mackey, M. Belkin, T. O'Donnell (1992)
Late stroke after carotid endarterectomy: the role of recurrent stenosis.Journal of vascular surgery, 15 6
A. Callow (1982)
Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy.Archives of surgery, 117 8
M. Mattos, K. Hodgson, G. Londrey, L. Barkmeier, D. Ramsey, M. Garfield, D. Sumner (1992)
Carotid endarterectomy: operative risks, recurrent stenosis, and long-term stroke rates in a modern series.The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, 33 4
E. Diethrich, M. N'diaye, D. Reid (1996)
Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients.Journal of Endovascular Surgery, 3
C. Rockman, T. Riles, R. Landis, P. Lamparello, G. Giangola, M. Adelman, G. Jacobowitz (1999)
Redo carotid surgery: An analysis of materials and configurations used in carotid reoperations and their influence on perioperative stroke and subsequent recurrent stenosis.Journal of vascular surgery, 29 1
Barnett Hjm., D. Taylor, R. Haynes, D. Sackett, S. Peerless, G. Ferguson, A. Fox, R. Rankin, V. Hachinski, Wiebers Do, M. Eliasziw (1991)
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.The New England journal of medicine, 325 7
Mohan Das, N. Hertzer, N. Ratliff (1985)
Recurrent Carotid Stenosis: A Five‐year Series of 65 ReoperationsAnnals of Surgery, 202
M. Wholey, M. Wholey, Patrice Bergeron, E. Diethrich, M. Henry, J. Laborde, K. Mathias, S. Myla, Roubin Gs, F. Shawl, J. Théron, Jay Yadav, G. Dorros, Juan Guimaraens, R. Higashida, Vijay Kumar, M. Leon, Michael Lim, H. Londero, J. Mesa, S. Ramee, Adolfo Rodriguez, K. Rosenfield, G. Teitelbaum, C. Vozzi (1998)
Current global status of carotid artery stent placement.Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis, 44 1
E. Oddone, K. Waters (1995)
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.JAMA, 274 19
Andre Leger, Michael Neale, John Harris (2001)
Poor durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting for treatment of recurrent artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy: an institutional experience.Journal of vascular surgery, 33 5
A. AbuRahma, M. Bates, P. Stone, J. Wulu (2001)
Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease.Journal of vascular surgery, 34 5
G. Treiman, J. Jenkins, W. Edwards, W. Barlow, W. Edwards, R. Martin, J. Mulherin (1992)
The evolving surgical management of recurrent carotid stenosis.Journal of vascular surgery, 16 3
R. Degroote, Thomas Lynch, Zafar Jamil, Robert Hobson (1987)
Carotid restenosis: long-term noninvasive follow-up after carotid endarterectomy.Stroke, 18 6
B. Hill, Cornelius Olcott, Ronald Dalman, E. Harris, Christopher Zarins (1999)
Reoperation for carotid stenosis is as safe as primary carotid endarterectomy.Journal of vascular surgery, 30 1
R. Darling, P. Paty, D. Shah, B. Chang, R. Leather (1996)
Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery: technique and results in 449 procedures.Surgery, 120 4
P. Cao, G. Giordano, P. Rango, S. Zannetti, R. Chiesa, G. Coppi, D. Palombo, F. Peinetti, C. Spartera, V. Stancanelli, E. Vecchiati (2000)
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial.Journal of vascular surgery, 31 1 Pt 1
J. Yadav, M. Wholey, R. Kuntz, P. Fayad, B. Katzen, G. Mishkel, T. Bajwa, P. Whitlow, N. Strickman, M. Jaff, J. Popma, David Snead, D. Cutlip, B. Firth, K. Ouriel (2004)
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.The New England journal of medicine, 351 15
D. Fischman, M. Leon, D. Baim, R. Schatz, M. Savage, I. Penn, K. Detre, L. Veltri, D. Ricci, M. Nobuyoshi (1994)
A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators.The New England journal of medicine, 331 8
Fischeman (1994)
A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery diseaseN Engl J Med, 331
E. Chakhtoura, R. Hobson, J. Goldstein, G. Simonian, B. Lal, P. Haser, Michael Silva, F. Padberg, P. Pappas, Z. Jamil (2001)
In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty-stenting: incidence and management.Journal of vascular surgery, 33 2
Dhiraj Shah, R. Darling, B. Chang, P. Paty, P. Kreienberg, W. Lloyd, R. Leather (1998)
Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability.Annals of surgery, 228 4
Current options for treating recurrent carotid stenosis (RCS) include standard longitudinal arteriotomy and patch angioplasty with or without carotid endarterectomy (s-PCEA), carotid-carotid bypass, or carotid angioplasty and stent (CAS). Eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) is an effective procedure for treating primary carotid stenosis, yet it has not been reported for treating RCS. We evaluated the feasibility and outcome of e-CEA for treating of RCS in comparison to s-PCEA. The records of all patients undergoing elective CEA for symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade RCS from January 1981 to July 2002 were reviewed. Although during the earlier period s-PCEA was performed preferentially, this paradigm changed to e-CEA being the preferred technique for treatment of RCS. During the course of postoperative follow-up when duplex sonography suggested high-grade RCS, the diagnosis was confirmed via arteriography. Data on cranial nerve injury, recurrent stenosis, stroke, and death were prospectively collected into a vascular registry database and analyzed retrospectively, Students’ t-test and chi-square analysis were used to compare the group’s baseline characteristics and outcomes. Over a 21-year period, 7001 patients underwent primary CEA for symptomatic (n = 2405, 34%) or asymptomatic (n = 4596, 66%) high-grade stenosis via standard (n = 1501, 21%) or eversion (n = 5500, 79%) techniques. Fifteen (25%) patients had 70 to 80% stenosis, 30 (51%) had 81 to 90% stenosis, and 14 (24%) had 91 to 99% stenosis. During this time period, 59 patients presented with symptomatic (n = 18, 31%) or asymptomatic (n = 41, 69%) high-grade RCS and underwent operative repair via s-PCEA (n = 22, 37%) or eversion (n = 37, 63%) techniques. The mean time interval for repeat carotid surgery for RCS was 49 months in the s-PCEA group and 48 months in the e-CEA group. Permanent cranial nerve injuries, stroke, and recurrent restenosis occurred in one (4.5%), one (4.5%), and one (4.5%) of the patients undergoing s-PCEA, respectively. In the e-CEA group, these events occurred in one (27%), none (0%), and one (2.7%) patients, respectively, There were no deaths during the 30-day postoperative period. Eversion CEA is a feasible option for the treatment of many RCSs and can be performed safely with a low rate of cranial nerve injury, recurrent stenosis, stroke, and death.
Annals of Vascular Surgery – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 27, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.