Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Liu Hongtao, C. Feng, Pan Xia, Y. Kai, L. Shuqin (2011)
Method of oxygen-enriched two-stage underground coal gasificationMining Science and Technology (china), 21
A. González, N. Moreno, R. Navia, X. Querol (2010)
Study of a Chilean petroleum coke fluidized bed combustion fly ash and its potential application in copper, lead and hexavalent chromium removalFuel, 89
Z. Bian, H. Inyang, J. Daniels, F. Otto, Sue Struthers (2010)
Environmental issues from coal mining and their solutionsMining Science and Technology (china), 20
K. Stańczyk, K. Kapusta, M. Wiatowski, J. Swiadrowski, A. Smoliński, J. Rogut, A. Kotyrba (2012)
Experimental simulation of hard coal underground gasification for hydrogen productionFuel, 91
Shuqin Liu, Yongtao Wang, Li Yu, J. Oakey (2006)
Volatilization of mercury, arsenic and selenium during underground coal gasificationFuel, 85
Shuqin Liu, Jinggang Li, M. Mei, Donglin Dong (2007)
Groundwater Pollution from Underground Coal GasificationJournal of China University of Mining and Technology, 17
F. Laquer, S. Manahan (1987)
Solution factors affecting the adsorption of phenol onto a siltstoneChemosphere, 16
J. Kačur, M. Durdán, M. Laciak, P. Flegner (2014)
Impact analysis of the oxidant in the process of underground coal gasificationMeasurement, 51
Shuqin Liu, Jun-hua Liu, Li Yu (2002)
Environmental benefits of underground coal gasification.Journal of environmental sciences, 14 2
Sung Lee, Y. Seo, Ha-Na Jang, Kyu-Shik Park, J. Baek, Hi-Soo An, Kwang-Chul Song (2006)
Speciation and mass distribution of mercury in a bituminous coal-fired power plantAtmospheric Environment, 40
Lanhe Yang, Jie Liang, Li Yu (2003)
Clean coal technology—Study on the pilot project experiment of underground coal gasificationEnergy, 28
E. Lorenc-Grabowska, G. Gryglewicz, M. Diez (2013)
Kinetics and equilibrium study of phenol adsorption on nitrogen-enriched activated carbonsFuel, 114
R. Meij, H. Winkel (2007)
The emissions of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants from modern coal-fired power stationsAtmospheric Environment, 41
Kun Tong, Yihe Zhang, Dan Fu, X. Meng, Qi An, P. Chu (2014)
Removal of organic pollutants from super heavy oil wastewater by lignite activated cokeColloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 447
Zhenqi Hu, Minglang Zhang, Shenghua Chen, Bao-guo Ma, Yanling Zhao, Jing Li (2009)
Pollution generation, migration and in situ control measures on coal refusesProcedia Earth and Planetary Science, 1
M. Wiatowski, K. Stańczyk, J. Swiadrowski, K. Kapusta, K. Cybulski, E. Krause, J. Grabowski, J. Rogut, N. Howaniec, A. Smoliński (2012)
SEMI TECHNICAL UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION (UCG) USING THE SHAFT METHOD IN EXPERIMENTAL MINE BARBARAFuel, 99
Lanhe Yang, Xing Zhang, Shuqin Liu, Li Yu, Weilian Zhang (2008)
Field test of large-scale hydrogen manufacturing from underground coal gasification (UCG)International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33
K. Kapusta, K. Stańczyk, M. Wiatowski, J. Chećko (2013)
Environmental aspects of a field-scale underground coal gasification trial in a shallow coal seam at the Experimental Mine Barbara in PolandFuel, 113
A. Bhutto, Aqeel Bazmi, G. Zahedi (2013)
Underground coal gasification: From fundamentals to applicationsProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 39
A. Smoliński, K. Stańczyk, K. Kapusta, N. Howaniec (2012)
Chemometric Study of the Ex Situ Underground Coal Gasification Wastewater Experimental DataWater, Air, and Soil Pollution, 223
Huang Nian-dong (2000)
Studies on the adsorption of toxic phenol with fine coke slag in coke plantJournal of Xiangtan Mining Institute
M. Humenick (1984)
Water pollution control for underground coal gasificationJournal of Energy Engineering-asce, 110
M. Alhamed, S. Wohnlich (2014)
Environmental impact of the abandoned coal mines on the surface water and the groundwater quality in the south of Bochum, GermanyEnvironmental Earth Sciences, 72
E. Shafirovich, A. Varma (2009)
Underground Coal Gasification: A Brief Review of Current StatusIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48
V. Fierro, V. Torné-Fernández, D. Montané, A. Celzard (2008)
Adsorption of phenol onto activated carbons having different textural and surface propertiesMicroporous and Mesoporous Materials, 111
G. Kisku, Sandeep Yadav, Rajnish Sharma, M. Negi (2012)
Potential environmental pollution hazards by coal based power plant at Jhansi (UP) IndiaEnvironmental Earth Sciences, 67
K. Kapusta, K. Stańczyk (2011)
Pollution of water during underground coal gasification of hard coal and ligniteFuel, 90
M. Humenick, C. Mattox (1978)
Groundwater pollutants from underground coal gasificationWater Research, 12
Warren Zubot, M. MacKinnon, P. Chelme‐Ayala, Daniel Smith, M. El-Din (2012)
Petroleum coke adsorption as a water management option for oil sands process-affected water.The Science of the total environment, 427-428
S. Guttikunda, P. Jawahar (2014)
Atmospheric emissions and pollution from the coal-fired thermal power plants in IndiaAtmospheric Environment, 92
Sateesh Daggupati, R. Mandapati, S. Mahajani, A. Ganesh, D. Mathur, Rakesh Sharma, P. Aghalayam (2010)
Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasificationEnergy, 35
Underground coal gasification (UCG) is an attractive clean coal technology by converting coal into combustible gases in situ, but it also poses a potential environmental risk to groundwater pollution. In this paper, the Hebi pyrolysis/gasification semi-cokes were prepared by applying tubular resistance furnace, model test of UCG were also carried out. The porous characteristics of obtained semi-cokes were characterized by measuring the amount of N2 adsorbed at 77 K, the removal of hexavalent chromium in simulated wastewater and hazardous trace elements in condensate water produced from UCG model test by pyrolysis semi-cokes were further investigated. The results indicate that the porous structure of semi-coke is closely related with applied preparation temperature and atmosphere (nitrogen, water vapor or CO2). The specific surface area (S BET) of semi-coke gasified by CO2 at 900°C reaches the largest, semi-coke pyrolyzed at 900°C (YM-900) then follows; Compared with CO2 gasification semi-coke, a lower S BET and total pore volume (V t) and a larger pore with average pore width of 4.9 nm than 3.06 nm are observed in the water vapor gasification semi-coke; An increased S BET and V t of pyrolysis semi-cokes are initially observed as the temperature increases, the largest can be obtained at 900°C and then decrease at higher temperatures. The removal results show that the highest removal rate of Cr+6 in simulated wastewater can be obtained by using YM-900, subsequently by CO2 gasification semi-coke; It is also found that hazardous trace elements in gas condensate water can be removed to certain extents by different pyrolysis semi-cokes, wherein the removal rates of Cd, Pb, Gr, Ni and Co can exceed 60%. However, parts of trace elements can be leached into groundwater from semi-coke samples, which should be paid more attention to.
Coke and Chemistry – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 11, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.