Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Q. Deng, Peizhen Zhang, Y. Ran, Xiaoping Yang, W. Min, Q. Chu (2003)
Basic characteristics of active tectonics of ChinaScience in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 46
G. Muñoz, O. Ritter (2013)
Pseudo‐remote reference processing of magnetotelluric data: a fast and efficient data acquisition scheme for local arraysGeophysical Prospecting, 61
X. Garcia, Alan Jones (2008)
Robust processing of magnetotelluric data in the AMT dead band using the continuous wavelet transformGeophysics, 73
M. Smirnov (2003)
Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown pointGeophysical Journal International, 152
Jianhua Cai (2013)
Magnetotelluric Response Function Estimation Based on Hilbert–Huang TransformPure and Applied Geophysics, 170
G. Oettinger, V. Haak, J. Larsen (2001)
Noise reduction in magnetotelluric time-series with a new signal–noise separation method and its application to a field experiment in the Saxonian Granulite MassifGeophysical Journal International, 146
Shalivahan, B. Bhattacharya (2002)
How remote can the far remote reference site for magnetotelluric measurements beJournal of Geophysical Research, 107
D. Sutarno, K. Vozoff (1991)
Phase-smoothed robust M-estimation of magnetotelluric impedance functionsGeophysics, 56
A. Chave, D. Thomson, M. Ander (1987)
On the robust estimation of power spectra, coherences, and transfer functionsJournal of Geophysical Research, 92
J. Larsen (1989)
Transfer functions: smooth robust estimates by least-squares and remote reference methodsGeophysical Journal International, 99
Shalivahan, R. Sinharay, B. Bhattacharya (2006)
Remote reference magnetotelluric impedance estimation of wideband data using hybrid algorithm: HYBRID ROBUST ESTIMATION OF MT IMPEDANCEJournal of Geophysical Research, 111
J. Meywerk, Ramanathan (2002)
インド洋実験(INDOEX)時の,海面における全・分光輝度に及ぼす人工エーロゾル粒子の影響Journal of Geophysical Research, 107
G. Egbert (1997)
Robust multiple‐station magnetotelluric data processingGeophysical Journal International, 130
T. Gamble, W. Goubau, J. Clarke (1979)
Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic referenceGeophysics, 44
Maik Neukirch, Xavier García (2014)
Nonstationary magnetotelluric data processing with instantaneous parameterJournal of Geophysical Research, 119
D. Trad, J. Travassos (2000)
Wavelet filtering of magnetotelluric dataGeophysics, 65
U. Weckmann, A. Magunia, O. Ritter (2005)
Effective noise separation for magnetotelluric single site data processing using a frequency domain selection schemeGeophysical Journal International, 161
A. Chave, D. Thomson (1989)
Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimationJournal of Geophysical Research, 94
G. Egbert, J. Booker (1986)
Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functionsGeophysical Journal International, 87
T. Gamble (1979)
magnetotellurics with a remote referenceGeophysics, 81
O. Ritter, A. Junge, G. Dawes (1998)
New equipment and processing for magnetotelluric remote reference observationsGeophysical Journal International, 132
K. Kappler (2011)
A data variance technique for automated despiking of magnetotelluric data with a remote referenceGeophysical Prospecting, 60
J. Clarke, T. Gamble, W. Goubau, R. Koch, R. Miracky (1983)
REMOTE-REFERENCE MAGNETOTELLURICS: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES*Geophysical Prospecting, 31
Abstract Valid interpretations require precise and accurate determination of magnetotelluric impedance. Although remote reference magnetotellurics has been extensively investigated, majority of these studies have focused on the non-correlation between noise and signal or between the noise in the base station and that in the reference station. Few works have explored the correlation between magnetic signals in the base station and in the reference station. This study analyzes the effects of remote reference magnetotellurics on the sounding curve under different noise intensities in the base station. Results showed that regular remote reference magnetotellurics induce a limited quality-improving effect on the sounding curve and fail to satisfy the further data processing requirements at a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), suggesting that regular remote reference magnetotelluric methods cannot obtain an accurate transfer function under a low SNR for a time series. Comparison of various magnetic field data revealed that a strong correlation exists among magnetic signals 60 km apart at the Longmenshan area. Thus, the remote reference magnetotelluric method based on the magnetic field correlation between the base and reference stations is proposed to screen the power spectrum and undo the noise. The effectiveness and correctness of the proposed method are validated by the results of the theoretical and field data processing and of the intermediate data analysis, further proving that the remote reference magnetotelluric method based on magnetic field correlation is superior to the regular remote reference magnetotelluric method.
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 2018
Keywords: geophysics/geodesy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.