Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Remittances and labor supply in post-conflict Tajikistan

Remittances and labor supply in post-conflict Tajikistan We analyze the impact of remittances on the labor supply of men and women in post-conflict Tajikistan. Individuals from remittance-receiving households are less likely to participate in the labor market and supply fewer hours when they do. The results are robust to different measures of remittances and migration. When we differentiate between regions by their exposure to the 1992-1998 armed conflict, we observe that the negative effect of remittances on the labor supply of women is primarily driven by women from the regions more exposed to fighting and destruction during the war. Remittances have a similar negative effect on the supply of labor hours worked across all regions, both for men and women. Further, in the households that do not have migrants, remittances have no effect on the labor supply by males, suggesting that migration and not remittances is the primary factor explaining male labor force participation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png IZA Journal of Labor & Development Springer Journals

Remittances and labor supply in post-conflict Tajikistan

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/remittances-and-labor-supply-in-post-conflict-tajikistan-ux4wemQIIr

References (52)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Justino and Shemyakina; licensee Springer.
Subject
Economics / Management Science; Labor Economics; Population Economics
eISSN
2193-9020
DOI
10.1186/2193-9020-1-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We analyze the impact of remittances on the labor supply of men and women in post-conflict Tajikistan. Individuals from remittance-receiving households are less likely to participate in the labor market and supply fewer hours when they do. The results are robust to different measures of remittances and migration. When we differentiate between regions by their exposure to the 1992-1998 armed conflict, we observe that the negative effect of remittances on the labor supply of women is primarily driven by women from the regions more exposed to fighting and destruction during the war. Remittances have a similar negative effect on the supply of labor hours worked across all regions, both for men and women. Further, in the households that do not have migrants, remittances have no effect on the labor supply by males, suggesting that migration and not remittances is the primary factor explaining male labor force participation.

Journal

IZA Journal of Labor & DevelopmentSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 31, 2012

There are no references for this article.