Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reliability of Sexually Violent Predator Civil Commitment Criteria in Florida

Reliability of Sexually Violent Predator Civil Commitment Criteria in Florida The present study investigated the reliability of Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) civil commitment criteria under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act. The purpose of the study was to determine if, independently, 2 evaluators would reach the same conclusions about the same client (n = 295). According to civil commitment criteria outlined by the United States Supreme Court (Kansas v. Hendricks, 1997), SVPs must display a mental abnormality predisposing them to sexual violence and a likelihood of future sexual violence. The interrater reliability of 8 DSM-IV diagnoses applied by evaluators to determine whether a client has a “mental abnormality that predisposes him to sexual violence” was found to be poor to fair (kappa = .23 to .70). The interrater reliability of risk assessment instruments used to determine “likelihood of reoffense” was good (ICC = .77 to .85). The recommendations made by evaluators regarding whether or not to refer a client for civil commitment demonstrated poor reliability (kappa = .54). Implications for practice and policy are explored. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior Springer Journals

Reliability of Sexually Violent Predator Civil Commitment Criteria in Florida

Law and Human Behavior , Volume 28 (4) – Oct 8, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/reliability-of-sexually-violent-predator-civil-commitment-criteria-in-PNR8fQxoEW

References (31)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychology Association
Subject
Psychology; Law and Psychology; Criminology and Criminal Justice, general; Personality and Social Psychology; Community and Environmental Psychology
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039330.22347.ad
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The present study investigated the reliability of Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) civil commitment criteria under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act. The purpose of the study was to determine if, independently, 2 evaluators would reach the same conclusions about the same client (n = 295). According to civil commitment criteria outlined by the United States Supreme Court (Kansas v. Hendricks, 1997), SVPs must display a mental abnormality predisposing them to sexual violence and a likelihood of future sexual violence. The interrater reliability of 8 DSM-IV diagnoses applied by evaluators to determine whether a client has a “mental abnormality that predisposes him to sexual violence” was found to be poor to fair (kappa = .23 to .70). The interrater reliability of risk assessment instruments used to determine “likelihood of reoffense” was good (ICC = .77 to .85). The recommendations made by evaluators regarding whether or not to refer a client for civil commitment demonstrated poor reliability (kappa = .54). Implications for practice and policy are explored.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 8, 2004

There are no references for this article.