Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A.Y.u. Shevyakov (2011)
Economic inequality as an obstacle for demographic growthZh. Nov. Ekon. Assots., 9
Ingvild Almås (2007)
International Income Inequality: Measuring PPP Bias by Estimating Engel Curves for Food
C.h. Lessmann (2014)
Spatial inequality and development—Is there an inverted-U relationshipJ. Dev. Econ., 106
T. Remington (2015)
Why is interregional inequality in Russia and China not fallingCommunist and Post-communist Studies, 48
T. Piketty (2014)
Cambridge
Angus Deaton (2010)
Price Indexes, Inequality, and the Measurement of World PovertyThe American Economic Review, 100
J. Williamson (1965)
Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the PatternsEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 13
M. Bleaney, Akira Nishiyama (2002)
Economic growth and income inequality
(2002)
Izmerenie ekonomicheskogo neravenstva (Measuring of Economic Inequality)
A.Y.u. Shevyakov, A.Y.a. Kiruta (2009)
Neravenstvo, ekonomicheskii rost i demografiya: neissledovanye vzaimosvyazi
R. Yemtsov (2005)
Spatial Inequality and Development
Ruslan Yemtsov (2003)
Quo Vadis? Inequality and Poverty Dynamics across Russian Regions
A. Erosa, Tatyana Koreshkova, Diego Restuccia (2010)
How important is human capital? A quantitative theory assessment of world income inequalityThe Review of Economic Studies, 77
(2014)
Study of the relationship between the development level and degree of income inequality in the Russia’s
(2011)
Income inequality as a factor of economic and demographic growth
(2014)
Dynamics and factors of intra- and interregional population income differentiation in the Russian Federation
M. Sanderson (2013)
Does immigration have a Matthew Effect? A cross-national analysis of international migration and international income inequality, 1960-2005.Social science research, 42 3
S. Barrios, E. Strobl (2009)
The dynamics of regional inequalitiesRegional Science and Urban Economics, 39
Orley Amos (1988)
Unbalanced regional growth and regional income inequality in the latter stages of developmentRegional Science and Urban Economics, 18
Branko Milanovic (2012)
Global inequality recalculated and updated: the effect of new PPP estimates on global inequality and 2005 estimatesThe Journal of Economic Inequality, 10
T. Piketty (2013)
Capital in the twenty-first century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes.The British journal of sociology, 65 4
Christian Lessmann (2011)
Spatial Inequality and Development - is There an Inverted-U Relationship?Development Economics eJournal
(2006)
Regional disparities and national development revisited: the case of Western Europe, Eur
Dao‐Zhi Zeng (2016)
Capital mobility and spatial inequalities in income and industrial locationThe Journal of Economic Inequality, 14
The paper uses A.Yu. Shevyakov’s approach to the decomposition of the Gini coefficient into normal and excessive inequalities, the full deflation method for determining real income and real labor productivity, correlation and regression analysis, and the construction of Cobb–Douglas production functions. Three differentiation levels of normal and excessive inequalities (poverty line, social minimum line, and social well-being line) are proposed. For Russian regions in 2013, the study has found an inverse relationship between real per capita income and the Gini coefficient of excessive inequality, as well as a direct relationship between real per capita income and the Gini coefficient of normal inequality, except for the three most affluent regions, which show a reverse trend of decline in normal inequality. Correlations of normal and excessive inequalities with general development indicators, composition and dynamics of the population, the structure of income and gross regional product, sectoral structure of the economy, and the population’s wealth are revealed. A positive correlation for normal inequality and a negative correlation for excessive inequality with real output in Russian regions are confirmed based on the inclusion of Gini coefficients in the five-factor interregional Cobb–Douglas production function. It is concluded that excessive inequality, on the one hand, is a consequence of the low development level and, on the other hand, suppresses production possibilities and incentives. Normal inequality promotes economic development, which is first accompanied by a growth in normal inequality, followed by a decline.
Regional Research of Russia – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 24, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.