Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Davies (1987)
Reduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: Effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight-retrieval strategies.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40
M. J. Pitera-Stallard (1996)
When jurors use the past to decide the future: A study to reduce hindsight bias in the courtroom
Jacob Cohen (1992)
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer
H. Arkes (1991)
Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing.Psychological Bulletin, 110
Scott Hawkins, R. Hastie (1990)
Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.Psychological Bulletin, 107
G. Wood (1978)
The knew-it-all-along effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4
Jonathan Casper, Kennette Benedict, Joseph Perry (1989)
Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight biasLaw and Human Behavior, 13
R. Caplan, K. Posner, F. Cheney (1991)
Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care.JAMA, 265 15
J. Cohen (1992)
A power primerPsychological Bulletin, 112
D. Wasserman, Richard Lempert, R. Hastie (1991)
Hindsight and CausalityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17
S. S. Weir, P. Curtis, R. A. McNutt (1990)
Expert testimony based on decision analysis: A malpractice case reportJournal of General Internal Medicine, 5
D. Lowe (1992)
An empirical examination of the hindsight bias phenomenon in evaluation of auditor decisions
J. Cohen (1977)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
K. A. Kamin, J. J. Rachlinski (1995)
Ex post ≠ ex ante: Determining liability in hindsightLaw and Human Behavior, 19
Jonathan Casper, Kennette Benedict, J. Kelly (1988)
Cognitions, Attitudes and Decision‐Making in Search and Seizure Cases 1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18
E. J. Devitt, C. B. Blackmar, M. A. Wolff (1987)
Federal jury practice and instructions: Civil
Barbara Wexler, J. Schopp (1989)
How and when to correct for juror hindsight bias in mental health malpractice litigation: Some preliminary observationsBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 7
H. Arkes, D. Faust, T. Guilmette, K. Hart (1988)
Eliminating the hindsight bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
H. Arkes (1989)
Principles in judgment/decision making research pertinent to legal proceedingsBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 7
Kim Kamin, Jeffrey Rachlinski (1995)
Ex post ≠ ex anteLaw and Human Behavior, 19
Baruch Fischhoff (1977)
Perceived Informativeness of Facts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3
B. Fischhoff (1975)
Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertaintyJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1
L. B. Sand, J. S. Siffert, W. P. Loughlin, S. A. Reiss, N. Batterman (1997)
Modern federal jury instructions
M. Rosenberg, W. Mathes, E. Devitt (1965)
Federal Jury Practice and InstructionsHarvard Law Review, 79
D. Schkade, L. Kilbourne (1991)
Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight biasOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49
C. Lord, M. Lepper, Elizabeth Preston (1984)
Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 47 6
L. Wrightsman (1987)
Psychology and the legal system
R. Agans, L. Shaffer (1994)
The Hindsight Bias: The Role of the Availability Heuristic and Perceived RiskBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 15
Baruch Fischhoff (1975)
Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1982)
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
In the legal system, jurors are asked to render a decision after the event in question has already occurred and the final outcome, typically negative, is known. This “after-the-fact” structure of the legal system makes jurors susceptible to a human judgment phenomenon known as hindsight bias. This study focused on reducing hindsight bias in a courtroom context by incorporating a debiasing strategy within the defense's closing argument. Subjects viewed one of three videotaped versions of plaintiff and defense closing arguments in a commercial litigation case (i.e., foresight condition, hindsight condition, and hindsight debiasing condition). Results indicate that the hindsight debiasing strategy was effective in reducing subject-juror hindsight bias.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 2, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.