Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H Prakken (2001)
Modelling defeasibility in law: logic or procedure?Fundam Inform, 48
R Loui, J Norman (1995)
Rationales and argument movesArtif Intell Law, 3
J Pollock (1994)
Justification and defeatArtif Intell, 67
T Bench-Capon, H Prakken (2006)
Computational models of argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2006
F Bex, H Prakken, C Reed, D Walton (2003)
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisationsArtif Intell Law, 12
H Prakken (2002)
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoningArtif Intell Law, 10
T Bench-Capon, H Prakken (2010)
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in lawArtif Intell Law, 18
G Vreeswijk (1997)
Abstract argumentation systemsArtif Intell, 90
T Bench-Capon, H Prakken (2006)
Information technology and lawyers: advanced technology in the legal domain, from challenges to daily routine
T Gordon (1994)
The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialecticsArtif Intell Law, 2
H Prakken, G Sartor (2009)
Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic
P Dung (1995)
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n—person gamesArtif Intell, 77
K Atkinson, T Bench-Capon (2007)
Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systemsArtif Intell, 171
H Prakken (2005)
AI and law, logic and argument schemesArgumentation, 19
C Reed, G Rowe (2004)
Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representationInt J AI Tools, 13
H Prakken (2008)
Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case studyArtif Intell Law, 16
H Prakken (2005)
Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentationJ Log Comput, 15
T Bench-Capon (2003)
Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworksJ Logic Comput, 13
T Gordon, H Prakken, D Walton (2007)
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proofArtif Intell, 171
H Prakken, G Sartor (1997)
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible prioritiesJ Appl Non-Class Log, 7
B Verheij (2008)
Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2008: the twentyfirst annual conference
H Prakken (2010)
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured argumentsArgument Comput, 1
D Walton, C Reed, F Macagno (2008)
Argumentation schemes
B Verheij (2003)
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logicArtif Intell Law, 11
J Hage (1996)
A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to matchArtif Intell Law, 4
In this article the argumentation structure of the court’s decision in the Popov v. Hayashi case is formalised in Prakken’s (Argument Comput 1:93–124; 2010) abstract framework for argument-based inference with structured arguments. In this framework, arguments are inference trees formed by applying two kinds of inference rules, strict and defeasible rules. Arguments can be attacked in three ways: attacking a premise, attacking a conclusion and attacking an inference. To resolve such conflicts, preferences may be used, which leads to three corresponding kinds of defeat, after which Dung’s (Artif Intell 77:321–357; 1995) abstract acceptability semantics can be used to evaluate the arguments. In the present paper the abstract framework is instantiated with strict inference rules corresponding to first-order logic and with defeasible inference rules for defeasible modus ponens and various argument schemes. The main techniques used in the formal reconstruction of the case are rule-exception structures and arguments about rule validity. Arguments about socio-legal values and the use of precedent cases are reduced to arguments about rule validity. The tree structure of arguments, with explicit subargument relations between arguments, is used to capture the dependency relations between the elements of the court’s decision.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 11, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.