Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Wenyi Wang, F. Galati, Dyana Szibbo (2020)
LSTM Residual Signal for Gear Tooth Crack Diagnosis
G. Garcia, Gabriel Michau, Mélanie Ducoffe, J. Gupta, Olga Fink (2020)
Temporal signals to images: Monitoring the condition of industrial assets with deep learning image processing algorithmsProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 236
(2007)
Diagnostics Prognostics and fault simulation for rolling element bearings
(2000)
Linear prediction and gear fault diagnosis
Wenyi Wang, Kristina Johnson, Tony Galati (2020)
Vibration analysis of planet gear bore-rim failure using enhanced planet time synchronous averagingEngineering Failure Analysis, 117
I. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, Yoshua Bengio (2021)
Generative adversarial networks, 12158
W. Smith, R. Randall (2015)
Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark studyMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 64
With the huge success of applying deep learning (DL) methodologies to image recognition and natural language processing in recent years, researchers are now keen to use them in the machine condition monitoring (MCM) context. There are numerous papers in applying various DL techniques, such as auto-encoder, restricted Boltzmann machine, convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network, to MCM problems ranging from component level condition monitoring (machine tool wear prediction, bearing fault diagnosis and classification and hydraulic pump fault diagnosis) to system level health management (aircraft and spacecraft diagnosis). In this paper, we give a brief overview in the area of DL for MCM with a focus on reviewing the most recent papers published since 2019. In Part 1, we present some critical views regarding whether any breakthrough has been achieved from an MCM domain expert perspective, with the main conclusion that DL has great potential for MCM applications and a major breakthrough could come soon since the shortfalls lie more in data than in the DL methodologies. Our overall impression is that (a) DL models are not really showing their great potentials with only a small training data; (b) faulty-condition data is hard to come by for training DL, but normal condition data is abundant, so anomaly detection makes more sense; (c) applying DL only to the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing fault dataset is not sufficient for real-world industrial applications as it was from a very simple test rig, and applying DL to data from complex systems like helicopter gearbox data may deliver much more convincing results. In Part 2, we enhance the main conclusion of the critical review with supplement views and a case study on analyzing Bell-206B helicopter main gearbox planet bearing failure data using some traditional MCM techniques in contrast to applying the long short-term memory (LSTM) DL method. We can conclude from the case study that the DL-based methods are not necessarily always superior to the traditional MCM techniques for dataset from moderately complex machinery.
Acoustics Australia – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 21, 2021
Keywords: Deep learning; LSTM; Machine condition monitoring; Bearing fault diagnosis; Helicopter planet bearing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.