Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Ariff, O. Donchin, T. Nanayakkara, R. Shadmehr (2002)
A Real-Time State Predictor in Motor Control: Study of Saccadic Eye Movements during Unseen Reaching MovementsThe Journal of Neuroscience, 22
D. Wolpert, Zoubin Ghahramani, Michael Jordan (1995)
An internal model for sensorimotor integration.Science, 269 5232
Francesco Lacquaniti, J. Soechting, S. Terzuolo (1986)
Path constraints on point-to-point arm movements in three-dimensional spaceNeuroscience, 17
(2004)
He is currently working towards his Ph.D. under the supervision of Professor Billard at Learning Algorithms and Systems Laboratory (LASA) at EPFL, within the EU Robot
G. Lintern (1997)
Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behaviorComplex., 2
M. Desmurget, D. Pélisson, Y. Rossetti, C. Prablanc (1998)
From Eye to Hand: Planning Goal-directed MovementsNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 22
S. Giszter, F. Mussa-lvaldi, E. Bizzi, Margo Cantor, Sylvester Sczepankowsi, Patricia Harlan, David Smith, Emilio B&i (1993)
Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord, 13
C. Atkeson, J. Hollerbach (1985)
Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements, 5
E. Todorov, Michael Jordan (2002)
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordinationNature Neuroscience, 5
A. Liégeois (1977)
Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multi-body mechanisms, 7
M. Desmurget, H. Gréa, C. Prablanc (1998)
Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movementsExperimental Brain Research, 119
J. Burdick (1989)
On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion manifoldsProceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation
A. Ijspeert, J. Nakanishi, S. Schaal (2002)
Movement imitation with nonlinear dynamical systems in humanoid robotsProceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292), 2
J. Baillieul (1985)
Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulatorsProceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2
T. Flash, N. Hogan (1985)
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model, 5
O. Khatib (1985)
Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile RobotsThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 5
D. Whitney (1969)
Resolved Motion Rate Control of Manipulators and Human ProsthesesIEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems, 10
E. Bizzi, N. Accornero, W. Chapple, N. Hogan (1984)
Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement, 4
A. Feldman, M. Levin (1995)
The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor controlBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 18
R. Shadmehr, S. P. Wise (2005)
The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing
I. Iossifidis, G. Schöner (2004)
Autonomous reaching and obstacle avoidance with the anthropomorphic arm of a robotic assistant using the attractor dynamics approachIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004, 5
C. Wampler (1986)
Manipulator Inverse Kinematic Solutions Based on Vector Formulations and Damped Least-Squares MethodsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 16
S. Chiaverini, B. Siciliano, O. Egeland (1994)
Review of the damped least-squares inverse kinematics with experiments on an industrial robot manipulatorIEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol., 2
A. Billard, S. Calinon, F. Guenter (2006)
Discriminative and adaptive imitation in uni-manual and bi-manual tasksRobotics Auton. Syst., 54
G. Schöner, M. Dose, C. Engels (1995)
Dynamics of behavior: Theory and applications for autonomous robot architecturesRobotics Auton. Syst., 16
J. Soechting, C. Buneo, Uta Herrmann, M. Flanders (1995)
Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?, 15
P. Morasso (2004)
Spatial control of arm movementsExperimental Brain Research, 42
Tan Chan, R. Dubey (1993)
A weighted least-norm solution based scheme for avoiding joint limits for redundant joint manipulatorsIEEE Trans. Robotics Autom., 11
W. Abend, E. Bizzi, P. Morasso (1982)
Human arm trajectory formation.Brain : a journal of neurology, 105 Pt 2
F. Chaumette, É. Marchand (2001)
A redundancy-based iterative approach for avoiding joint limits: application to visual servoingIEEE Trans. Robotics Autom., 17
M. Carrozzo, F. Lacquaniti (1994)
A hybrid frame of reference for visuo-manual coordination.Neuroreport, 5 4
G. Ermentrout (1997)
Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behaviorBulletin of Mathematical Biology
M. Desmurget, M. Desmurget, Michael Jordan, C. Prablanc, Marc Jeannerod (1997)
Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies.Journal of neurophysiology, 77 3
H. Cruse, M. Brüwer (2004)
The human arm as a redundant manipulator: The control of path and joint anglesBiological Cybernetics, 57
J. Paillard (1991)
Brain and space
Y. Nakamura, H. Hanafusa (1986)
Inverse kinematics solutions with singularity robustness for robot manipulator controlASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 108
D. Bullock, S. Grossberg (1988)
Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation.Psychological review, 95 1
L. Righetti, A. Ijspeert (2006)
Programmable central pattern generators: an application to biped locomotion controlProceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.
Yoshihiko Nakamura, H. Hanafusa (1986)
Inverse kinematic solutions with singularity robustness for robot manipulator controlJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of The Asme, 108
We study a reaching movement controller for a redundant serial arm manipulator, based on two principles believed to be central to biological motion control: multi-referential control and dynamical system control. The resulting controller is based on two concurrent dynamical systems acting on different, yet redundant variables. The first dynamical system acts on the end-effector location variables and the second one acts on the joint angle variables. Coherence constraints are enforced between those two redundant representations of the movement and can be used to modulate the relative influence of each dynamical system. We illustrate the advantages of such a redundant representation of the movement regarding singularities and joint angle avoidance.
Autonomous Robots – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 12, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.