Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Norton, Samuel Sommers, J. Vandello, J. Darley (2006)
MIXED MOTIVES AND RACIAL BIAS The Impact of Legitimate and Illegitimate Criteria on Decision MakingPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 12
Gordon Hodson, J. Dovidio, S. Gaertner (2002)
Processes in Racial Discrimination: Differential Weighting of Conflicting InformationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28
M. B. Kovera, J. J. Dickinson, B. L. Cutler (2002)
Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 11: Forensic Psychology
S. Gaertner, J. Dovidio (1986)
The aversive form of racism.
M. Rose (1999)
The Peremptory Challenge Accused of Race or Gender Discrimination? Some Data from One CountyLaw and Human Behavior, 23
Colorblindness and interracial interaction: Playing the " political correctness game
Kenneth Melilli (1996)
Batson in Practice: What We Have Learned About Batson and Peremptory ChallengesNotre Dame Law Review, 71
P. Davies, P. McAllister (1995)
Striking differences.Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 9 37
S. R. Sommers (2006)
On racial diversity and group decision-making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberationsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90
Samuel Sommers, P. Ellsworth (2003)
How Much Do We Really Know about Race and Juries? A Review of Social Science Theory and ResearchChicago-Kent} Law Review, 78
R. E. Nisbett, T. D. Wilson (1977)
Telling more than we can knowPsychological Review, 84
Samuel Sommers, P. Ellsworth (2001)
White Juror Bias: An Investigation of Prejudice Against Black Defendants in the American CourtroomPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 7
R. MacCoun (1989)
Experimental Research on Jury Decision-MakingScience, 244
J. Dovidio, S. Gaertner (1986)
Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
Samuel Sommers, M. Norton (2006)
Lay Theories About White Racists: What Constitutes Racism (and What Doesn't)Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
T. Mitchell, Ryann Haw, J. Pfeifer, C. Meissner (2005)
Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant TreatmentLaw and Human Behavior, 29
(2003)
SJC urges limits on juror rejections
R. Nisbett, T. Wilson (1977)
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84
S. Diamond, H. Zeisel (1974)
A Courtroom Experiment on Juror Selection and Decision-MakingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1
E. Plant, P. Devine (1998)
Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudiceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75
C. Crandall, A. Eshleman, Laurie O’Brien (2002)
Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization.Journal of personality and social psychology, 82 3
L. Sweeney, C. Haney (1992)
The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies.Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 10
M. Raphael, E. Ungvarsky (1993)
Excuses, Excuses: Neutral Explanations Under Batson v. KentuckyUniversity of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 27
(1992)
Why the peremptory challenge should be abolished
M. Kovera, Jason Dickinson, B. Cutler (2003)
Voir Dire and Jury Selection
Samuel Sommers, P. Ellsworth (2000)
Race in the Courtroom: Perceptions of Guilt and Dispositional AttributionsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26
P. Olczak, M. Kaplan, Steven Penrod (1991)
Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
C. Hendrick (1987)
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
(1992)
Reaching the final chapter in the story of peremptory challenges
B. Bornstein (1999)
The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out?Law and Human Behavior, 23
B. Turner, Rick Lovell, John Young, W. Denny (1986)
Race and peremptory challenges during voir dire: Do prosecution and defense agree?Journal of Criminal Justice, 14
De Vera, M. Jose (1976)
U. S. News and World Report シ ニ ミラレル ニホン ノ イメージ
A. Page (2005)
Batson''s blind-spot: Unconscious stereotyping and the peremptory challenge
W. Bowers, Benjamin Steiner, M. Sandys (2001)
Death Sentencing in Black and White: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Jurors' Race and Jury Racial CompositionUniversity of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 3
P. Devine (1989)
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56
E. Shafir, I. Simonson, A. Tversky (1993)
Reason-based choiceCognition, 49
Samuel Sommers (2006)
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making : Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations
E. Shafir, Itamar Simonson, A. Tversky (2006)
The Construction of Preference: Reason-Based Choice
Luther Swygert (1983)
Chicago-Kent Law Review
D. Baldus, G. Woodworth, David Zuckerman, N. Weiner (2001)
The Use of Peremptory Challenges in Capital Murder Trials: A Legal and Empirical AnalysisUniversity of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 3
M. Norton, J. Vandello, J. Darley (2004)
Casuistry and social category bias.Journal of personality and social psychology, 87 6
S. Diamond, L. Ellis, Elisabeth Schmidt (1997)
Realistic Responses to the Limitations of Batson v. KentuckyCornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7
Practically speaking, the peremptory challenge remained an inviolate jury selection tool in the United States until the Supreme Court's decision in Batson v. Kentucky. 476 U.S. 79 (1986). Batson‘s prohibition against race-based peremptories was based on two assumptions: (1) a prospective juror's race can bias jury selection judgments; (2) requiring attorneys to justify suspicious peremptories enables judges to determine whether a challenge is, indeed, race-neutral. The present investigation examines these assumptions through an experimental design using three participant populations: college students, advanced law students, and practicing attorneys. Results demonstrate that race does influence peremptory use, but these judgments are typically justified in race-neutral terms that effectively mask the biasing effects of race. The psychological processes underlying these tendencies are discussed, as are practical implications for the legal system.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 23, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.