Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Kobak (1999)
The emotional dynamics of disruptions in attachment relationships: Implications for theory, research, and clinical intervention.
B. Feeney (2007)
The dependency paradox in close relationships: accepting dependence promotes independence.Journal of personality and social psychology, 92 2
M. Ainsworth, S. Wall (1978)
Origins of the Sense of Security. (Book Reviews: Patterns of Attachment. A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation)Science
D Schnarch (2011)
Praise of Differentiation
Nehami Baum (2006)
A KLEINIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE DIVORCE PROCESS: FROM THE PARANOID-SCHIZOID TO THE DEPRESSIVE POSITIONClinical Social Work Journal, 34
MDS Ainsworth, MC Blehar, E Waters, S Wall (1978)
Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation
J Bowlby (1973)
Attachment and loss: Volume II: Separation and anger
J. Bowlby (1979)
The making & breaking of affectional bonds
(2000)
The consequence of divorce for adults and children
(1999)
The divorce cycle : A major variation in the American family life cycle
J. Wallerstein, Julia Lewis (2004)
The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: Report of a 25-Year Study.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21
P. Amato (2000)
The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and ChildrenJournal of Marriage and Family, 62
E. Hesse (1999)
The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives.
J. Bowlby (1980)
Loss--Sadness and Depression
B. Feeney, J. Monin (2008)
An attachment-theoretical perspective on divorce.
J. Cassidy, P. Shaver (1999)
Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications
E. Shapiro (1996)
Grief in Freud's life: reconceptualizing bereavement in psychoanalytic theory.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 13
J. Bowlby (2008)
A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development
Kelly Brennan, P. Shaver (1995)
Dimensions of Adult Attachment, Affect Regulation, and Romantic Relationship FunctioningPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21
Judith Feeney (1999)
Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships
Daniel Hawkins, A. Booth (2005)
Unhappily Ever After: Effects of Long-Term, Low-Quality Marriages on Well-BeingSocial Forces, 84
B Carter, M McGoldrick (1999)
The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives
Susan Johnson, V. Whiffen (2003)
Attachment processes in couple and family therapy
The dependency paradox (Feeney) states that independence actually can result from being in a nurturing relationship. Those who divorce often have the opposite notion that independence will occur without a relationship. The movies Eat, Pray, Love, An Unmarried Woman, and Kramer vs. Kramer examine divorce from different angles. The protagonists in all three movies grow through the process of divorce, each achieving a level of autonomy that seemed unattainable within their marriage. This paper aims to explore the concept of divorce in light of the dependency paradox by examining the self-differentiation achieved and the consequences of such independence for both the individual and, in Kramer vs. Kramer, for the child involved.
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 15, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.