Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Dawkins, J. Krebs (1978)
Animal signals: information or manipulation?
O. Hasson (1990)
Amplifiers and their role in the evolution of male displayEvol. Ecol., 4
R. Lande (1975)
The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci.Genetical research, 26 3
Prof. Curio (1976)
The Ethology of Predation
R. Dawkins, J.R. Krebs (1978)
Behavioural Ecology
M. Enquist (1985)
Communication during aggressive interactions with particular reference to variation in choice of behaviourAnimal Behaviour, 33
A. Zahavi (1977)
The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle).Journal of theoretical biology, 67 3
M. Andersson (1982)
Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisementBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 17
Oren Hasson (1991)
Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator.Trends in ecology & evolution, 6 10
O. Hasson, R. Hibbard, G. Ceballos (1989)
The pursuit deterrent function of tail-wagging in the zebra-tailed lizard (Callisaurus draconoides)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67
A. Pomiankowski (1987)
Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work – sometimesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 231
M. Andersson (1986)
EVOLUTION OF CONDITION‐DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCESEvolution, 40
O. Hasson (1989)
Amplifiers and the handicap principle in sexual selection: a different emphasisProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 235
R. Michod, O. Hasson (1990)
On the Evolution of Reliable Indicators of FitnessThe American Naturalist, 135
O. Hasson (1991)
Sexual displays as amplifiers: practical examples with an emphasis on feather decorationsBehavioral Ecology, 2
In many coevolutionary systems members of one party select members of a second party based on quality differences existing among members of the latter (e.g., predators and prey, pollinators and flowers, etc.). We examined the fate of characters that increase (amplifiers) or decrease (attenuators) the perceived amplitude of differences in the quality upon which choice of the selecting party is based. We found that the evolution of such characters depends on (i) the relationship between the cost of the character and the relative benefit it gives to the high quality individuals (if an amplifier) or low quality individuals (if an attenuator), and (ii) the frequency, among members of the selected party, of the quality sought by the selecting party.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: May 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.