Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Susan Zonia, M. Stommel (2000)
Interns' Self‐evaluations Compared with Their Faculty's EvaluationsAcademic Medicine, 75
M. Gordon (1991)
A review of the validity and accuracy of self‐assessments in health professions trainingAcademic Medicine, 66
K. Biernat, M. Masluk (1999)
Getting to Carnegie Hall: using standardized patients in palliative care education.Journal of palliative medicine, 2 2
J. Bransford (2000)
How people learn
F. Alnasir, N. Grant (1999)
Student self-assessment in a community-based clinical clerkship in family medicine: a preliminary reportEduc for Health, 12
A. Steinecke, A. Ciok (1997)
Aging research and education centers in the United States: a compendium.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 72 10
H. Barrows (1993)
An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMCAcademic Medicine, 68
M.A. Gordon (1997)
Cutting the Gordian Knot: a two-part approach to the evaluation and professional development of residentsAcad Med, 72
The ability to accurately self-assess is a critical component of professionalism and is included in the newly required Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies. To assess residents' ability to accurately self-assess their competencies related to a commonly presenting problem in geriatrics, a Standardized Patient, portraying an individual with early signs of dementia, was inserted into family medicine residents' clinic schedules. Immediately post the encounter, each resident self-assessed his/her performance using a four category (Communication, History of Present Illness, Social History, Functional Assessment), 17-item behavioral checklist. The items in each category highlighted items specific to a dementia-screening interview (e.g., HPI: Used a standardized exam which includes orientation, memory, recall and registration). Resident ratings were compared to ratings from two faculty assessors who independently viewed the videotape of each resident's SP interview. While statistically significant differences between the self-assessment and expert assessors appeared in only one of the four major check list categories (functional assessment), item specific analysis revealed significant differences on discrete items within the dementia screening interview. Implications for teaching and assessment consistent with the ACGME required competency assessment category of professionalism are discussed.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 6, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.